Transient bacteremia following the removal of four different types of rapid palatal expanders.

PURPOSE: General health related recommendations for prophylactic measures in connection with orthodontic treatments are limited due to the lack of evidence-based data. This study aimed to investigate the development of transient bacteremia following the removal of four types of rapid palatal expanders (RPE). METHODS: Seventy-five individuals aged 10-18 years undergoing rapid palatal expansion with four types of RPE were categorized according to the type of RPE used in their treatment: banded tooth-borne (group A (1), n = 17), banded tooth- and tissue-borne (group A (2), n = 17), bonded tooth-borne (group B (1), n = 18), and bonded tooth- and tissue-borne (group B (2), n = 23). Gingival inflammation was assessed using the gingival index one day before RPE removal. Furthermore, samples of blood (5 ml each) were collected before and 3 min after RPE removal. The groups were statistically evaluated for comparability with respect to sex, age, or wear time of the RPE and to the gingival index. In addition, the prevalence of bacteremia in the different groups was evaluated and statistically compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was found among the groups (p > 0.05) for sex, age, and RPE wear time. Mean gingival index was higher in group B (2) than in group A (1) (p < 0.05). The prevalence of bacteremia did not differ significantly between groups. Streptococcus species were identified in all bacteremia cases. The bacteremia prevalence of the groups was as follows: group A (1), 11.8%; group A (2), 23.5%; group B (1), 16.7%; and group B (2), 30.4%. CONCLUSION: This investigation demonstrated that removal of a RPE could cause bacteremia, but the RPE design did not affect the prevalence of bacteremia. The results of this study support the necessity of prophylaxis measures before RPE removal in indicated patients.

Outcomes of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding using Modified Nostril Retainers in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate at an Average Follow-up of 2 Years.

Objective: Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) using a modified nostril retainer is a new treatment approach. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of early nasal molding using this approach with an average follow-up of 2 years in patients with severe unilateral cleft lip and palate. Methods: This retrospective study included 18 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate without genetic syndromes who underwent PNAM with modified nostril retainers. The Grayson technique was employed with an intraoral plate to approximate cleft segments. Nasal molding was initiated before reducing the cleft width to 5 mm. Measurements, including alar base height ratio (ABHR), nasal floor width ratio (NFWR), columellar length ratio (CLR), columellar angle (CA), and nostril axis inclination on the cleft and non-cleft sides (NAI-C and NAI-NC, respectively), were calculated from standard photographs taken before PNAM (T1), after PNAM (T2), after an average of 1.81 months post-surgery (T3), and after an average of 2.2 years after T3 (T4). Pairwise comparisons of values at the four time points were conducted. Results: NFWR, CLR, CA, NAI-C and NAI-NC significantly increased after PNAM (p<0.05). However, no significant change was observed in ABHR (p>0.05) from T1 to T2. These outcomes were maintained at T4, and no patient developed a mega nostril. Conclusion: The use of a modified nostril retainer for nasal molding appears to provide stability during the high probability of relapse reported in the literature.