RESUMO
Objective: The present review was conducted to test whether the addition of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) within orthodontic bracket adhesives would alter their properties and assess their antimicrobial activity against cariogenic microorganisms in addition to noteworthy mechanical properties. Materials and methods: Using predetermined inclusion criteria, an electronic search was conducted using Dissertations and Thesis Global, the Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and Medline/PubMed. Specific terms were utilized while searching the database. Results: Only seven of the 10 included studies assessed shear bond strength (SBS). The mean SBS among the control group varied from 9.43 ± 3.03 MPa to 34.4 ± 6.7 MPa in the included studies, while in the experimental group, it varied from 6.33 ± 1.51 MPa to 25.05 ± 0.5 MPa. Antibacterial activity was assessed in five of the 10 included studies using TiO2 NPs, which could easily diffuse through bacterial media to form the growth inhibition zone. Conclusion: Antibacterial NPs added to orthodontic adhesives at a concentration of 1-5 wt% inhibit bacterial growth and have no effect on bond strength. How to cite this article: D Tivanani MVD, Mulakala V, Keerthi VS. Antibacterial Properties and Shear Bond Strength of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Incorporated into an Orthodontic Adhesive: A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(1):102-108.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the antibacterial activity and debonding force of retainers bonded with conventional and nanoparticle (TiO2) containing composite. METHODOLOGY: Antibacterial activity was tested against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus using disk agar diffusion, biofilm inhibition, and eluted components tests. For the eluted components test, colony counts of bacteria were tested on 0, 3, and 30 days. Three different retainers were bonded to the lingual surface of extracted lower incisors using conventional and 1% TiO2 composite. Samples were divided as follows: Group 1: 1a, stainless steel retainer (Bond-a-Braid) with conventional composite, and 1b, stainless steel retainer with nanoparticle composite; Group 2: 2a, titanium retainer with conventional composite, and 2b, titanium retainer with nanoparticle composite; Group 3: 3a, fiber-reinforced retainer (Interlig) with conventional composite, and 3b, fiber-reinforced retainer with nanoparticle composite. The Instron stereomicroscope was used to test debonding force and failure sites respectively. RESULTS: In the disk agar diffusion test, TiO2 composite has shown more inhibition zones. Biofilm inhibition test showed a significant decrease in colony counts of both organisms in the TiO2 group. The eluted component test showed a significant decrease in colony counts from day 0 to day 30 in the TiO2 group compared with the control group. The highest debonding force was observed in stainless steel retainers with conventional composite, and lowest in fiber-reinforced composite retainers with TiO2 composite, with no significant difference in Adhesive Remnant Index scores. CONCLUSION: The TiO2 composite group showed greater antibacterial activity without compromising the bond strength, which was statistically significant. Compared with other groups, stainless steel wires bonded with conventional composite showed the highest debonding force.
