RESUMO
Background During the COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), many patients developed pulmonary barotrauma either self-inflicted or ventilator-induced. In pulmonary barotrauma, air leaks into extra-alveolar tissue resulting in pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, and pneumoperitoneum. Methods After obtaining institutional approval, we retrospectively reviewed data from March 1, 2021, to September 31, 2021. Being a retrospective study, informed consent was not applicable. Patient data were collected from the Al Shifa patient information portal, which is an electronic medical record system available to all hospitals in the Ministry of Health, Oman. After identifying patients with pulmonary barotrauma, the following details were recorded and entered into an Excel sheet (Microsoft Corporation, Albuquerque, New Mexico) and a database was created, which contained the following: age, sex, smoking history, comorbidities, type, location, mode of barotrauma, mode of ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, interventions performed, and overall outcome (survived/deceased). Results A total of 529 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were admitted from March 2021 to September 2021 to the ICU. Twenty-eight patients developed barotrauma of variable severity and required interventions like the placement of intercostal drains. Out of 28, five patients developed spontaneous barotrauma, 14 patients had barotrauma after initiation of non-invasive ventilation, and nine patients had barotrauma as a result of invasive ventilation. The median number of days in the ICU was 19.5 (interquartile range: 12.5-26.5). Of the 28 patients, eight patients survived and were discharged from the hospital. Conclusion In this single-center, retrospective study at a secondary care hospital in Oman, we described our experience with patients who suffered pulmonary barotrauma during their ICU admission. We have also presented the incidence of spontaneous versus ventilator-induced barotrauma, the length of stay of these patients, the outcomes in terms of survival or death, the need for tracheostomy, secondary infections, and interventions performed as indicated.
RESUMO
Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with moderate to severe acute pancreatitis carry significant morbidity and mortality. A few unfortunate patients in whom the initial line of treatment fails to show clinical improvement develop multiorgan dysfunction involving lungs (adult respiratory distress syndrome), renal failure, intra-abdominal infections, sepsis, and septic shock, which ultimately leads to prolonged hospitalization and a substantial cost of treatment. The acute abdominal pain experienced by these patients is excruciating and requires multimodal analgesia. Continuous epidural analgesia has been found to provide good quality, opioid-sparing analgesia in these patients. A few studies have also demonstrated that segmental sympathectomy resulting from epidural blockade could lead to lowering of serum amylase and lipase levels improve paralytic ileus, and thus hastens the process of recovery. The present paper aims to discuss the advantages of continuous epidural analgesia in patients with acute pancreatitis of varying severity and to review the existing literature using specific keywords.
RESUMO
Introduction: Regional anesthesia (RA), i.e., spinal or epidural anesthesia when performed for lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) provides excellent surgical conditions, avoiding manipulation of the maternal airway, maternal satisfaction, and good postoperative analgesia. However, in situations like fetal distress (fetal heart rate abnormalities), obstetric indications (abruption of placenta, antenatal placental bleeding, cord prolapse), maternal refusal for RA, contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (anticoagulation, coagulopathy), and at times failed RA general anesthesia (GA) is administered. Several studies have demonstrated greater mortality and morbidity when LSCS is done under GA when compared to neuraxial block. Methods: After necessary approval, we retrospectively reviewed data over a period of 1 year (January 1, 2020-December 31, 2020) of LSCS under GA versus RA. The aim was to compare immediate postoperative complications, postoperative pulmonary complications up to 4 weeks from the time of elective and emergency LSCS under either RA or GA. Results: Of the 753 patients who underwent LSCS in one calendar year, there were 272 (36.12%) elective and 481 (63.87%) emergency LSCS. The number of elective LSCS under neuraxial block was 219 (29.09%) and under GA were 53 (7.03%). Emergency LSCS done under neuraxial block were 268 (35.59%) and under GA were 213 (28.28%). There were no adverse pulmonary complications at the end of 4 weeks in either group. Conclusion: RA provides maternal satisfaction and excellent perioperative analgesia in LSCS. Safe GA can be achieved with proper airway planning, if case is attended by at least two anesthesiologist with adequate preoperative fasting, and postoperative monitoring.
