Short- and Long-term Outcomes After Colonic Stent Insertion as a Bridge to Surgery in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Colonic stents have been inserted as a bridge to surgery in patients with resectable colorectal cancer, allowing bowel decompression for systemic assessment and better preparation to avoid stoma construction. However, reports of short- and long-term prognoses for elderly patients remain limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 175 consecutive patients who underwent colonic stent insertion for bowel obstruction followed by curative colectomy. Patients were divided into those >80 years old (Old, n=49) and those <80 years old (Young, n=126). After propensity score matching, 41 patients in each group matched. RESULTS: Before matching, performance status was poorer (p<0.001), postoperative complication rate was higher (p=0.009), adjuvant chemotherapy rate was lower (p<0.001), and hospital stay was longer (p<0.001) in the Old group. After matching, adjuvant chemotherapy rate was lower (9.8% vs. 39.0%; p=0.003) and hospital stay was longer (14 vs. 12 days; p=0.029) in the Old group. Five-year relapse-free survival (42.9% vs. 68.8%; p=0.200), overall survival (66.3% vs. 87.7%; p=0.081), and cancer-specific survival (68.2% vs. 87.7%; p=0.129) rates were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Colorectal resection after colonic stent insertion is useful for elderly patients, with potential to reduce postoperative complication rates and achieve good long-term results with appropriate case selection.

Impact of institutional volume on short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of institutional volume on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy is still being debated. This study aimed to investigate whether differences in postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colon resection exist between high- and low-volume centers. METHODS: Data were reviewed for 1360 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided according to whether they were treated at a high-volume center (≥100 colorectal surgeries annually; n = 947) or a low-volume center (<100 colorectal surgeries annually; n = 413). Propensity score matching was applied to balance covariates and minimize selection biases that could affect outcomes. Finally, 406 patients from each group were matched. RESULTS: After matching, patients from high-volume centers showed a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (19 vs. 17, p < .001) and more frequent involvement of expert surgeons (98.3% vs. 88.4%, p < .001). Postoperative complication rates were similar between groups (p = .488). No significant differences between high- and low-volume centers were seen in relapse-free survival (88.8% each, p = .716) or overall survival (85.7% vs. 82.8%, p = .480). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that in appropriately educated organizations, relatively safe procedures and good prognosis may be obtained for laparoscopic colectomy cases, regardless of institutional volume.

Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in patients over 90 years old: a Japanese multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of laparoscopic surgery on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer patients over 90 years old has remained unclear. METHODS: We reviewed 87 colorectal cancer patients aged over 90 years who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into an open surgery group (n = 22) and a laparoscopic surgery group (n = 65). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of laparoscopic surgery on postoperative outcome in elderly colorectal cancer patients, as compared to open surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (89.7%) had comorbidities. Frequency of advanced T stage was lower with laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.021). Operation time was longer (open surgery 146 min vs. laparoscopic surgery 203 min; p = 0.002) and blood loss was less (105 mL vs. 20 mL, respectively; p < 0.001) with laparoscopic surgery. Length of hospitalization was longer with open surgery (22 days vs. 18 days, respectively; p = 0.007). Frequency of infectious complications was lower with laparoscopic surgery (18.5%) than with open surgery (45.5%; p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed open surgery (p = 0.026; odds ratio, 3.535; 95% confidence interval, 1.159-10.781) as an independent predictor of postoperative infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal resection for patients over 90 years old is a useful procedure that reduces postoperative infectious complications.

Risk factors for reoperation within 30 days in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: A Japanese multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Thirty-day reoperation rate reflects short-term surgical outcomes following surgery. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer reportedly has positive effects on postoperative complications. This retrospective study investigated risk factors for 30-day reoperation rate among patients after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery using a multicenter database. METHODS: Participants comprised 3037 patients who had undergone laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer between April 2016 and December 2022 at the Nagasaki University and six affiliated centers, classified into those who had undergone reoperation within 30 days after surgery (RO group; n = 88) and those who had not (NRO group; n = 2949). Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between groups. RESULTS: In the RO group, anastomotic leakage occurred in 57 patients (64.8%), intestinal obstruction in 12 (13.6%), and intraabdominal abscess in 5 (5.7%). Female patients were more frequent, preoperative treatment less frequent, body mass index (BMI) lower, operation time longer, blood loss greater, and hospital stay longer in the RO group (p < .05 each). Multivariate analysis revealed BMI (odds ratio, 0.415; 95% confidence interval, 0.218-0.787; p = .021) and poor performance status (odds ratio, 1.966; 95% confidence interval, 1.106-3.492; p = .021) as independent predictors of reoperation. CONCLUSION: Perioperative measures are warranted for patients with low BMI and poor performance status undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Incidence of and risk factors for postoperative ileus between right and left laparoscopic colectomy using propensity-score-matched analysis: A retrospective multicenter study.

INSTRUCTION: In colon cancer, the incidence of postoperative ileus is reportedly higher for the right-side than for the left-side colon, but those studies included small numbers of subjects and contained several biases. Furthermore, risk factors for postoperative ileus remain unclear. METHODS: This multicenter study reviewed 1986 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy between 2016 and 2021 for right-side (n = 907) and left-side (n = 1079) colon cancer. After propensity score matching, 803 patients in each group were matched. RESULTS: Postoperative ileus occurred in 97 patients. Before matching, the proportion of female patients and median age were higher and frequency of preoperative stent insertion was lower with right colectomy (P < .001 each). After matching, the number of retrieved lymph nodes (17 vs 15, P < .001) and greater rates of undifferentiated adenocarcinoma (10.6% vs 5.1%, P < .001) and postoperative ileus (6.4% vs 3.2%, P = .004) were higher in right colectomy. Multivariate analysis revealed male gender (hazard ratio, 1.798; 95% confidence interval, 1.049-3.082; P = .32) and history of abdominal surgery (hazard ratio, 1.909; 95% confidence interval, 1.073-3.395; P = .027) as independent predictors of postoperative ileus in right-side colon cancer. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a higher risk of postoperative ileus after right colectomy with laparoscopic surgery. Male gender and history of abdominal surgery were risk factors for postoperative ileus after right colectomy.

Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a Japanese multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer (TCC) can be technically demanding due to the anatomical complexity of the region. In Japan, the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was established to improve the skill of laparoscopic surgeons and further develop surgical teams. We examined the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy for TCC and evaluated the effects of the Japanese ESSQS in facilitating this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for TCC between April 2016 and December 2021. Patients were divided into an ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (surgery performed by an ESSQS-qualified surgeon, n = 52) and a non ESSQS-qualified surgeon (surgery performed by a non ESSQS-unqualified surgeon, n = 84). Clinicopathological and surgical features were compared between groups. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 37 patients (27.2%). The proportion of patients who developed postoperative complications was lower in the ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (8.0%) than that in the non ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (34.5%; p < 0.017). Multivariate analysis revealed "Operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeon surgeon" (odds ratio (OR) 0.360, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.140-0.924; p = 0.033), blood loss (OR 4.146, 95% CI 1.688-10.184; p = 0.002), and clinical N status (OR 4.563, 95% CI 1.814-11.474; p = 0.001) as factors independently associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The present multicenter study confirmed the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colectomy for TCC and revealed that ESSQS-qualified surgeon achieved better surgical outcomes.

Efficacy of left colic artery preservation with D3 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic surgery for advanced sigmoid and rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: For advanced left colon cancer, lymph node dissection at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery is recommended. Whether the left colic artery (LCA) should be preserved or resected remains contentious. METHODS: The 367 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy or anterior resection and who were pathologically node-positive were reviewed. Patients were divided into LCA-preserving group (LCA-P, n = 60) and LCA-non-preserving group (LCA-NP, n = 307). Propensity score matching was applied to minimize selection bias and 59 patients were matched. RESULTS: Before matching, the rates of poor performance status and cardiovascular disease were higher in the LCA-P group (p < 0.001). After matching, operation time was longer (276 vs. 240 min, p = 0.001), the frequency of splenic flexure mobilization (62.7% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.003) and lymphovascular invasion (84.7% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.001) was higher in the LCA-P group. Severe postoperative complications (CD ≥ 3) occurred only in the LCA-NP group (0% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.028). The median follow-up period was 38.5 months (range 2.0-70.0 months). The 5-year RFS rates (67.8% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.871) and OS rates (80.4% vs. 74.9%, p = 0.308) were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic LCA-sparing surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer reduces the risk of severe complications and offers a favorable long-term prognosis.

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis.

PURPOSE: Several guidelines have recommended surgical resection for localized peritoneal metastases, but the prognosis remains poor. In addition, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection is under debate. The present study compared long-term outcomes between curative and non-curative resection and evaluated the effects of AC after curative resection. METHODS: Using a multicenter database, we retrospectively reviewed 123 colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases between April 2016 and December 2021. Of these patients, 49 underwent curative resection, and 74 underwent non-curative resection. RESULTS: The frequency of broad metastases was lower in the curative resection group (8.2%) than in the non-curative resection group (43.2%, p < 0.001). Among all patients, 5-year overall survival rate was higher in the curative resection group (43.0%) than in the non-curative resection group (7.3%, p = 0.004). Among patients who underwent curative resection, 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the AC group (48.2%) than in the non-AC group (38.1%, p = 0.037). Multivariate analysis of all patients revealed pathological N status and non-curative resection as independent predictors of overall survival. In patients who underwent curative resection, advanced age was an independent predictor of relapse-free survival, and AC was an independent predictor of overall survival. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study of colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases revealed that prognosis was more favorable for curable cases than for non-curable cases. Prognosis was more favorable in the AC group than in the non-AC group after curative resection.

Mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open colectomy for pathological T4 and/or N2 colon cancer patients: Multicenter study using propensity score matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess mid-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery (LAP) vs open surgery (OP) for pathological T4 (pT4) and/or N2 (pN2) colon cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 255 primary tumor resections for pT4 and/or pN2 colon cancer performed from 2015 to 2020 at six hospitals, divided into LAP (n = 204) and OP groups (n = 51). After propensity score matching to minimize selection bias, 47 matched patients per group were assessed. RESULTS: Before matching, the rate of males (53.9% vs. 37.3%, P = .042), left sided colon cancer (53.9% vs 37.3%, P = .042), D3 lymph node dissection (90.7% vs 68.6%, P < .001) and body mass index (kg/m2 ) (22.3 vs 21.8, P = .039) were significantly greater in the LAP group. The rate of pT4b (7.8% vs 40.4%, P < .001) was lower and pN2 was higher (57.4% vs 37.3%, P = .012) in the LAP group. After matching, preoperative characteristics and pathologic status were equivalent between the groups. The LAP and OP groups showed comparable overall survival (OS) (2-year OS, 84.5% vs 76.8%, P = .055) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (2-year RFS, 73.9% vs 52.8%, P = .359). In the patients with pT4, OS (2-year OS, 79.4% vs 75.7%, P = .359) and RFS (2-year RFS, 71.3% vs 58.7%) were comparable. In the patients with pN2, OS (2-year OS, 83.4% vs 76.3%) and RFS (2-year RFS, 69.6% vs 36.2%) were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: LAP for pT4 and/or pN2 colon cancer showed comparable mid-term outcomes compared with OP. LAP was an acceptable surgical approach in this cohort.

Total Risk Points Predict Short- and Long-term Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Resection in Older Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Estimation of physiological ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) is reported to be useful as a predictor of postoperative complications and poor long-term survival after colorectal cancer. The total risk points (TRP) system is a simplified scoring system of E-PASS, and this study evaluated the utility of TRP in colorectal cancer resection in older patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 237 patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The data were compared between a high TRP group (≥1,000, n=38) and a low TRP group (<1,000, n=199). We also conducted an analysis to determine risk factors of postoperative complications and poor long-term survival. RESULTS: TRP showed statistically significant correlations with the comprehensive risk score (CRS) of E-PASS (R=0.999, p<0.001). The high TRP group experienced postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2) more frequently (42.1% vs. 11.1%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that high TRP [odds ratio (OR)=5.214; 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=2.338-11.629; p<0.001] and age ≥80 (OR=2.760; 95%CI=1.308-5.826; p=0.008) were independent predictors of postoperative complications. Overall survival (OS) was poor in the high TRP group (5-year OS, 61.2% vs. 82.6%, p<0.001) compared with the low TRP group, and in the low prognostic nutritional index (<45) group (5-year OS, 70.9% vs. 86.3%, p=0.013) compared with the high prognostic nutritional index (≥45) group. Multivariate analysis showed that high TRP [hazard ratio (HR)=3.202; 95%CI=1.324-7,745; p=0.010] was an independent prognostic factor for poor OS. CONCLUSION: Patients aged ≥80 years should be closely monitored regarding postoperative complications. Reducing TRP to less than 1,000 is important to reduce postoperative complications and improve OS.

Effect of oxaliplatin in elderly colon cancer patients with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using fluoro-pyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FU + oxaliplatin) is recommended after curative resection for locally advanced colon cancer patients, several randomized controlled trials have shown no additional effect of oxaliplatin in patients aged ≥ 70 years. Here, we examined the effectiveness of FU + oxaliplatin on the long-term outcome of old patients with a high risk of recurrence. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included 346 colon cancer patients diagnosed with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease from 2016 to 2020. They were divided into an old group (≥ 70 years, n = 197) and a young group (< 70 years, n = 167). Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias, and 126 patients per group were matched. RESULTS: Before matching, the rates of poor performance status (p < 0.001) and the presence of comorbidities (76.1% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001) were higher in the old group. Although all baseline factors were similar between groups, after matching, the AC rate was lower in the old group (45.2% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.002). In the old group, relapse-free (82.2% vs. 55.6% and 69.6%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (83.1% vs. 80.0% and 44.4%, p < 0.05) rates were significantly higher in the AC patients with FU + oxaliplatin than in the AC patients with only FU and the non-AC patients. CONCLUSION: The selected old colon cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence gained an additional benefit with respect to prognosis from FU + oxaliplatin as AC.

Short- and long-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: A multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colon cancer is a recent innovation in minimally invasive surgery that can improve short-term outcome. However, several biases exist in current favorable comparisons of SILS with conventional laparoscopic (CL) surgery. Moreover, the oncological outcomes in SILS remain unclear. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes following SILS and CL for right colectomy using a propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: A total of 553 patients underwent curative resection for right colon cancer (58 SILS and 495 CL). After propensity score matching, 58 patients in each group were matched. RESULTS: Before matching, median age was younger (p = 0.037) and clinical stage was lower (p < 0.001) in the SILS group. After matching, operation time was shorter (172 versus 193 min, p = 0.007) and blood loss was less (12 versus 20 mL, p = 0.037) in the SILS group. Most of the SILS cases were performed (43.1%) or supervised (51.7%) by an expert surgeon. Median follow-up duration was 30 and 37 mo in the SILS and CL groups, respectively. Three-year relapse-free survival was 92.5% and 92.4% (p = 0.781); and overall survival was 100% versus 98.1% (p = 0.177). CONCLUSIONS: Under the control of expert surgeons, SILS appeared to be a safe and feasible approach and had similar oncological outcomes compared with CL in a propensity score-matched cohort of patients with right-sided colon cancer.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is not fully understood. This study aimed to identify outcomes following NAC plus AC for LARC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 252 patients who underwent curative resection for LARC. Propensity score matching matched 51 patients in NAC and non-NAC groups. RESULTS: Operative time (443 min vs. 286 min, p<0.001), blood loss (279 ml vs. 124 ml p<0.001), and number of patients who received AC were higher in the NAC group (74.5% vs. 33.3%, p<0.001). The Disease control rate of NAC group was 98.1%. The NAC group showed better 3-year RFS (86.5% vs. 62.1%, p=0.021). Patients who received both NAC and AC displayed better 3-year RFS (90.2%) compared to the non-NAC group both with (63.8%) and without (60.4%) AC (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: NAC and AC for LARC have the potential to improve oncological outcomes.

Charlson comorbidity index predicts anastomotic leakage in patients with resected right-sided colon cancer.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage after right-sided colon cancer surgery is a serious complication that affects postoperative mortality. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) has been reported to be a useful predictor of postoperative complications. METHODS: A total of 593 cases of right-sided colon cancer resections performed from 2016 to 2020 were examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of anastomotic leakage (AL, n = 28; no-AL, n = 565); clinicopathological and surgical characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The AL group patients had a higher comorbidity rate (96.4% vs. 66.9%, p < 0.001), higher CCI score (p < 0.001), higher blood loss (42 mL vs. 23 mL, p = 0.046), and longer hospital stay (30 days vs. 12 days, p < 0.001) than the no-AL group patients. The percentages of chronic pulmonary disease (14.3% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.029), cerebrovascular disease (14.3% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.022), connective tissue disease (39.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), leukemia (3.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.042), and moderate to severe liver disease (7.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the AL group. In the multivariate analysis, CCI ≥ 2 was identified as an independent predictor of postoperative anastomotic leakage (hazard ratio 4.91, 95% confidence interval 2.23-10.85, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CCI could predict anastomotic leakage after right-sided colon cancer surgery.

Short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients ≥ 85 years old: a multicenter study using a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: The number of laparoscopic surgeries for colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients has been increasing. We examined the short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for CRC in oldest-old patients (≥ 85 years old) compared with the outcomes in younger patients (< 85 years old). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed primary tumor resection for CRC from April 2015 to December 2020 at six hospitals. Short- and mid-term outcomes were compared after propensity score matching. RESULTS: From the 1374 patients, 126 matched pairs were selected. In the matched cohort, the duration of postoperative hospital stay was longer in the oldest-old patients than in the younger patients (15 days vs. 12 days, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in the rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications (21.4% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.254). The oldest-old patients showed a poorer overall survival (OS) than the younger patients (3-year OS, 79.9% vs. 93.5%, p = 0.005) but comparable recurrence-free survival (RFS) (3-year RFS, 72.2% vs. 81.6%, p = 0.530) and cancer-specific survival rates (CSS) (3-year CSS, 90.1% vs. 99.0%, p = 0.124). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for CRC in oldest-old patients was performed safely with comparable short-term outcomes to those in younger patients. Although the OS was poorer in the oldest-old patients than in the younger patients, the oncological mid-term outcomes were comparable. Laparoscopic surgery for CRC can be considered acceptable as a treatment in oldest-old patients.

Effect of hemodialysis on short-term outcomes after colon cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients who undergo surgery have a high risk of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to determine whether colon cancer surgery can be safely performed in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 1372 patients who underwent elective curative resection surgery for colon cancer between April 2016 and March 2020. RESULTS: Of the total patients, 19 (1.4%) underwent hemodialysis, of whom 19 (100%) had poor performance status and 18 had comorbidities (94.7%). Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 78.9% of hemodialysis patients. The postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in hemodialysis than non-hemodialysis patients (36.8% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.009). All postoperative complications in the hemodialysis patients were infectious type. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association of hemodialysis with complications (odds ratio, 2.9362; 95%CI, 1.1384-7.5730; p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Despite recent advances in perioperative management and minimally invasive surgery, it is necessary to be aware that short-term complications can still occur, especially infectious complications in hemodialysis patients.

Effect of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic multivisceral resection: Japanese multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of laparoscopic multivisceral resection (Lap-MVR) has been reported by several experienced high-volume centers. The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was established in Japan to improve the skill of laparoscopic surgeons and further develop surgical teams. We examined the safety and feasibility of Lap-MVR in general hospitals, and evaluated the effects of the Japanese ESSQS for this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 131 patients who underwent MVR between April 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into the laparoscopic surgery group (LAC group, n = 98) and the open surgery group (OPEN group, n = 33). The clinicopathological and surgical features were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Compared with the OPEN group, BMI was significantly higher (21.9 vs 19.3 kg/m2, p = 0.012) and blood loss was lower (55 vs 380 ml, p < 0.001) in the LAC group. Operation time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay were similar between the groups. ESSQS-qualified surgeons tended to select the laparoscopic approach for MVR (p < 0.001). In the LAC group, ESSQS-qualified surgeons had superior results to those without ESSQS qualifications in terms of blood loss (63 vs 137 ml, p = 0.042) and higher R0 resection rate (0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.040), despite having more cases of locally advanced tumor. In addition, there were no conversions to open surgery among ESSQS-qualified surgeons, and three conversions among surgeons without ESSQS qualifications (0% vs 15.0%, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed blood loss (odds ratio 1.821; 95% CI 1.324-7.654; p = 0.010) as an independent predictor of postoperative complications. Laparoscopic approach was not a predictive factor. CONCLUSIONS: The present multicenter study confirmed the feasibility and safety of Lap-MVR even in general hospitals, and revealed superior results for ESSQS-qualified surgeons.

A case of two traumatic penetrations of a duodenal diverticulum caused by a kick to the upper abdomen.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: A duodenal diverticulum is a pseudodiverticulum that lacks a proper muscular layer. Cases of traumatic penetration or perforation of a duodenal diverticulum are relatively rare. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old woman was injured when her roommate kicked her in the upper abdomen, and was transferred to our hospital 6 h after the injury with upper abdominal pain and lethargy. Computed tomography revealed a duodenal diverticulum and retroperitoneal emphysematous changes and exudates. Peritonitis due to duodenal penetration was suspected and emergency laparotomy was performed. Intraoperative findings revealed two traumatic penetrations of the duodenal diverticulum. We resected the diverticulum with an automatic suture device and covered the resection site with omentum. Twenty-one days postoperatively, she was transferred to her original hospital with no complications following an uneventful postoperative course. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Most causes of penetration or perforation of the duodenal diverticulum are diverticulitis, and few reports have described penetration or perforation of duodenal diverticulum due to trauma. Our case was extremely rare that caused by a kick to the upper abdomen and resulted in two penetrations of a duodenal diverticulum although factors contributing to the multiple penetrations were considered. CONCLUSION: Penetration or perforation of a duodenal diverticulum occasionally results in a rapid deterioration to a severe state. Comprehensive judgement of the general condition and laboratory findings and selection of an appropriate treatment policy is important.

A learning curve in using organ retractor for single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047-6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.

[Clinical Investigation of Surgical Cases for Pulmonary Aspergillosis].

INTRODUCTIONS: The number of cases requiring surgical resection for pulmonary aspergillosis has increased in recent years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2008 to March 2019, 10 patients underwent pulmonary resection for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis(CPA) in our hospital. RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with simple pulmonary aspergilloma (SPA) and 5 were diagnosed with chronic progressive pulmonary aspergillosis( CPPA). The median age was 73 years, and 8 patients were men. A history of tuberculosis was present in 2 cases, diabetes was present in 3 cases, and prednisolone( PSL) administration was performed in 3 cases. The operative procedures included 1 pneumonectomy, 4 lobectomies, 1 segmentectomy, and 4 wedge resections. The median surgery time was 220.5 minutes, and the median blood loss was 301 ml, requiring perioperative transfusion in 2 cases. Postoperative pneumonia was observed in 2 cases. The median postoperative observation period was 11.5 months, and 6 out of 8 patients did not show postoperative recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with pulmonary aspergillosis have a high rate of underlying disease and it is necessary to pay attention to postoperative complications, it has been shown that surgery can be performed safely on these patients by selecting appropriate cases and surgical procedures.