Impact of a policy to improve the management of oral medications when patients are fasting before a procedure: an interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Managing medications inappropriately when patients have oral intake restrictions can cause patient harm. This study evaluated the impact of a medication policy separating fasting from nil by mouth with respect to giving oral medications in patients fasting before a diagnostic or interventional procedure. METHODS: The policy stipulated that 'fasting' means oral medications should be given with a sip of water up to 1 hour before a procedure, unless there is a clinical reason to withhold, while 'nil by mouth' means nothing to be given orally, including medications.The policy was implemented in Surgical areas in February 2015 and Medical areas in March 2015 at a tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne, Australia, and included bedside signs, clinical champions and education sessions.The study was conducted in 2020. Admission and medication records were matched for non-elective procedure patients from January 2014 to May 2016. The monthly proportion of doses omitted inappropriately and overall omissions pre/post-policy implementation were compared using segmented regression. RESULTS: Pre-implementation, the proportion of doses withheld inappropriately and total omissions in medical areas were 18.1% and 28.0%, respectively. Post-implementation, an absolute reduction of 13.4% (95% CI 9.0% to 17.7%) and 11.1% (95% CI 2.6% to 19.6%), respectively, was seen. Post-implementation linear trend showed a 0.3% (95% CI 0.0% to 0.6%) increase in inappropriate omissions but not overall omissions.In Surgical areas, pre-implementation proportions for inappropriate and overall omissions were lower than Medical areas'. Post-implementation, there was an absolute decrease in doses withheld inappropriately (8.3%, 95% CI 0.8% to 15.7%, from 11.9% pre-implementation) but not total omissions. CONCLUSIONS: Distinguishing fasting from nil by mouth appeared to provide clarity for some staff: a reduction in inappropriate omissions was seen post-implementation. Although the small increase in post-implementation linear trend for inappropriate omissions in Medical areas suggests sustainability issues, total omissions were sustained. The policy's concepts require verification beyond our institution.

Qualitative exploration of Australian Muslim patients’ perceptions and experiences surrounding medication management during Ramadan.

Objective To explore Australian Muslim patients' perceptions and experiences surrounding medication management practices during Ramadan. Methods This was a qualitative exploration of the views and experiences of Muslim patients who were hospitalised during or shortly prior to Ramadan 2021. Data comprised comments obtained from a cross-sectional telephone or face-to-face questionnaire about medications and Ramadan fasting at a tertiary-referral hospital in Melbourne, Australia. A purposeful criterion sampling approach was employed for participant recruitment. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Data were coded inductively and subthemes and themes were developed via an iterative process. Results Comments were provided by 88 patients born in a wide range of countries and with a variety of medical and surgical co-morbidities. Themes identified included interpretation of Ramadan fasting, altering medications to facilitate fasting, perceptions about healthcare professionals and health knowledge. Many patients altered their medications to facilitate Ramadan fasting and there was considerable variability in interpretation of what breaks the fast. Patients' perceptions and previous experiences with healthcare professionals determined whether they sought advice about managing their medications during Ramadan or dismissed advice and/or self-managed their medications, sometimes inappropriately. Conclusions This exploration of Australian Muslim patients found diverse views and experiences around medication practices during Ramadan - past relationships with healthcare professionals influenced this practice. As there are ramifications for physical, spiritual and family wellbeing, it is imperative that healthcare professionals partner with their Muslim patients to optimise their medication management and health outcomes for Ramadan.

Barriers to managing medications appropriately when patients have restrictions on oral intake.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Investigation of several serious adverse events in our organization highlighted that medications were managed inappropriately when patients have oral intake restrictions. The aim of this work was to identify the barriers to optimal medication management when patients have restrictions on their oral intake. METHOD: Data were feedback and comments obtained between 2011 and 2014 from a hospital-wide quality assurance project. Data had not been purposefully collected and were in response to a general request for feedback regarding managing oral medications when patients have oral intake restrictions. Data came from a range of clinical staff and from various forums associated with the quality assurance project, including 37 presentations, 34 group meetings, and over 50 one-on-one meetings, as well as emails and other sources. Data were analysed using the thematic analysis approach. Data were coded inductively, and the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework were used to categorize the data. Subthemes and themes were then developed. RESULTS: Barriers could be broadly grouped into systems-level issues (organizational guidance and work environment) and the individual person-level issues (staff knowledge and beliefs). These barriers highlight the complexity of the medication management task. The lack of standardized guidance and consistent terminology regarding medication administration when patients have restrictions on oral intake, particularly when fasting or nil by mouth, were important systems factors, as were workflow issues and the "culture" of the environment in which staff practiced. Lack of knowledge about medication administration, social influences, and role interpretation were important individual person factors. CONCLUSION: Systems- and individual person-level issues were significant contributors to inappropriate medication management when patients have oral intake restrictions. Many of the barriers may be addressed with systems approaches such as hospital-wide guidance that simplifies and standardize oral medication administration instructions, particularly regarding fasting and nil by mouth terminology.

Surgical nurses' perceptions and experiences of a medications and oral restrictions policy change: A focus group study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceptions and experiences of surgical nurses before and after introducing the Medications and Oral Restrictions Policy (the Policy). BACKGROUND: The Policy was developed following extensive consultation, and evidence-based strategies were considered for its implementation. However, it is possible uptake did not meet expectations. DESIGN: Focus group interviews. METHODS: Three focus groups were conducted in November 2015 around 'what worked, what didn't and why, before and after hospital-wide implementation of the Policy.' Data were coded and analysed using an inductive-deductive thematic analysis approach. The COREQ checklist guided reporting. RESULTS: The three groups consisted of 16, 14 and six surgical nurses. Before the Policy, there was confusion, lack of clarity and guidance, and lack of experience and confidence in managing medications when patients had oral restrictions. After the Policy rollout, there was a sense of 'knowing what to do' because of improved clarity and decision support; but there were also problems with: not everyone knowing about the policy, particularly due to staff movement and turnover; and, individual interpretation of the policy including use of its signs outside of context, and decision-making processes. CONCLUSION: Exploration of nurses' perceptions of a medication-related policy change found that while the Policy provided clarity and decision support for some, it made little difference for others. Limited reach of the policy was an issue despite an effort to address this at the outset, as well as variations in interpretation of the policy and subsequent decision-making. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: How individuals interpret information and their understanding of the context behind the policy or guideline may affect implementation and should be considered alongside other barriers when implementing medication-related initiatives. Furthermore, implementation strategies that are independent of ongoing resources and/or key champions to sustain should be prioritised for all initiatives.

Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is an integrative framework developed from a synthesis of psychological theories as a vehicle to help apply theoretical approaches to interventions aimed at behavior change. PURPOSE: This study explores experiences of TDF use by professionals from multiple disciplines across diverse clinical settings. METHODS: Mixed methods were used to examine experiences, attitudes, and perspectives of health professionals in using the TDF in health care implementation projects. Individual interviews were conducted with ten health care professionals from six disciplines who used the TDF in implementation projects. Deductive content and thematic analysis were used. RESULTS: Three main themes and associated subthemes were identified including: 1) reasons for use of the TDF (increased confidence, broader perspective, and theoretical underpinnings); 2) challenges using the TDF (time and resources, operationalization of the TDF) and; 3) future use of the TDF. CONCLUSION: The TDF provided a useful, flexible framework for a diverse group of health professionals working across different clinical settings for the assessment of barriers and targeting resources to influence behavior change for implementation projects. The development of practical tools and training or support is likely to aid the utility of TDF.

Weather patients will come?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether weather conditions affect emergency department (ED) attendance and admissions from the ED. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective observational study in a large metropolitan ED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ED attendance (total and via ambulance) and admissions to hospital from ED, as a function of weather variables. RESULTS: On warm, dry, sunny and good weather days there were significantly more ED attendances in total than there were on cool, rainy, dull and bad weather days, respectively (P < or = 0.001). There were significant correlations between ED attendance and temperature (r = 0.36, P < 0.001), rainfall (r = - 0.20, P < 0.001) and hours of sunshine (r = 0.17, P = 0.001). Attendance via ambulance was not affected by weather variables. Admissions from the ED were positively correlated with temperature (r = 0.15, P < 0.01) and negatively correlated with rainfall (r = - 0.12, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As there is a clear relationship between weather conditions and ED attendance, incorporating meteorological forecasting into emergency medicine training may improve ED scheduling. To improve the morale of ED staff coping with an onslaught of patients on good weather days, the ED environment should simulate sunny weather, with swimming pools, sun lamps, palm trees and Beach Boys music.