Role of observational studies in supporting extrapolation of efficacy data from adults to children with epilepsy - A systematic review of the literature using lacosamide as an example.

Extrapolation of efficacy data from adults to children is accepted for focal epilepsy - the antiepileptic drug, lacosamide, has been approved for the treatment of children ≥4 years of age on this basis. Since many small-scale, open-label studies are reported in the literature before approval, a systematic review was conducted to ascertain whether results of these could be used to support extrapolation in epilepsy in the future. In the absence of randomised trials, a second analysis was conducted for reports on lacosamide use in adults with generalized epilepsies. Twenty-seven articles were included in the paediatric qualitative synthesis, and 14 in the adult. Paediatric studies were analysed separately based on seizure type: focal, generalised and mixed. In focal epilepsy, safety and seizure-related findings mirrored those observed in the adult Phase II/III trials, supporting the feasibility of data extrapolation. Few studies reported outcomes in children with epilepsies associated with generalised seizures, and those that included children with different seizure types, mostly did not provide results separately. Lacosamide treatment appeared beneficial for children and adults experiencing tonic-clonic and myoclonic seizures. Reports of seizure aggravation were inconsistent and, in many cases, could not be clearly attributed to lacosamide. Given the absence of sufficient data, evidence for the feasibility of extrapolation was not as clear-cut as it was in focal epilepsy. These results highlight the complexities of conducting trials in the generalised epilepsy setting, and the importance of studies in the real-life setting and of analysing efficacy data per generalized seizure type and syndrome.

Excitation by dopamine of rat subthalamic nucleus neurones in vitro-a direct action with unconventional pharmacology.

Recent anatomical and physiological studies have pointed to a functional innervation of the subthalamic nucleus by dopamine. This nucleus has a pivotal role in basal ganglia function and voluntary movement control and the possibility that dopamine, and dopaminergic medication used in Parkinson's disease, might directly influence its activity is of considerable interest. We have evaluated electrophysiologically the action and pharmacology of dopamine on single subthalamic neurones in rat brain slices. Dopamine increased firing rate to up to a mean of 60% in 98% of the 261 neurones tested when examined using extracellular single-unit recording. This excitation was unaffected by the GABA antagonist picrotoxin, and the glutamate receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, and persisted in a low Ca(2+)/raised Mg(2+) solution, indicative of a direct action, independent of synaptic transmission. Of the 33 cells examined using whole patch-clamp recording, only 13 showed measurable increases in firing rate and/or depolarisations in response to dopamine. Dopamine-responsive cells displayed significantly greater access resistance, suggesting that an unidentified cytoplamic constituent, removed by whole-cell dialysis, was required for the response. Using extracellular recording, the D2-like dopamine receptor agonists quinpirole and bromocryptine, but not the D1-like receptor agonist 1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol, also consistently caused an excitation. This was mimicked by the catecholamine releaser amphetamine in 60% of cells tested. However, the dopamine excitation was not significantly reduced either by the D1-like receptor antagonist 7-chloro8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine or the D2-like receptor antagonists (-)-sulpiride, eticlopride and (+)-butaclamol, and the quinpirole excitation was also unaffected by (-)-sulpiride. In contrast, (-)-sulpiride, eticlopride and (+)-butaclamol all abolished the D2-like receptor-mediated inhibition by dopamine of substantia nigra pars compacta neurones. The alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist phentolamine was a weak antagonist of dopamine excitations, but not of those caused by quinpirole. Dopamine excitations also showed weak sensitivity to the 5-HT(2) antagonist ritanserin, but were unaffected by the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazocin and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol. The pharmacology of this dopamine excitation is inconsistent with an action on any known catecholamine receptor. However, the effect of amphetamine indicates that an unidentified monamine--possibly dopamine--can be released within the subthalamic nucleus to cause an excitation. The anomalies of its pharmacological characterisation do not strongly support a physiologically relevant direct action of dopamine in the rat subthalamic nucleus.