First-Principles-Based Insight into Electrochemical Reactivity in a Cobalt-Carbonate-Hydroxide Pseudocapacitor.

Cobalt carbonate hydroxide (CCH) is a pseudocapacitive material with remarkably high capacitance and cycle stability. Previously, it was reported that CCH pseudocapacitive materials are orthorhombic in nature. Recent structural characterization has revealed that they are hexagonal in nature; however, their H positions still remain unclear. In this work, we carried out first-principles simulations to identify the H positions. We then considered various fundamental deprotonation reactions inside the crystal and computationally evaluated the electromotive forces (EMF) of deprotonation (V dp). Compared with the experimental potential window of the reaction (<0.6 V (vs saturated calomel electrode (SCE)), the computed V dp (vs SCE) value (3.05 V) was beyond the potential window, indicating that deprotonation never occurred inside the crystal. This may be attributed to the strong hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) that formed in the crystal, leading to structural stabilization. We further investigated the crystal anisotropy in an actual capacitive material by considering the growth mechanism of the CCH crystal. By associating our X-ray diffraction (XRD) peak simulations with experimental structural analysis, we found that the H-bonds formed between CCH planes (approximately parallel to the ab-plane) can result in 1-D growth (stacked along the c-axis). This anisotropic growth controls the balance between the total "non-reactive" CCH phases (inside the material) and the "reactive" hydroxide (Co(OH)2) phases (surface layers); the former stabilizes the structure, whereas the latter contributes to the electrochemical reaction. The balanced phases in the actual material can realize high capacity and cycle stability. The results obtained highlight the possibility of regulating the ratio of the CCH phase versus the Co(OH)2 phase by controlling the reaction surface area.

Computational Design to Suppress Thermal Runaway of Li-Ion Batteries via Atomic Substitutions to Cathode Materials.

The cathode material of a lithium-ion battery is a key component that affects durability, capacity, and safety. Compared to the LiCoO2 cathode material (the reference standard for these properties), LiNiO2 can extract more Li at the same voltage and has therefore attracted considerable attention as a material that can be used to obtain higher capacity. As a trade-off, it undergoes pyrolysis relatively easily, leading to ignition and explosion hazards, which is a challenge associated with the application of this compound. Pyrolysis has been identified as a structural phase transformation of the layered rocksalt structure → spinel → cubic rocksalt. Partial substitution of Ni with various elements can reportedly suppress the transformation and, hence, the pyrolysis. It remains unclear which elemental substitutions inhibit pyrolysis and by what mechanism, leading to costly material development that relies on empirical trial and error. In this study, we developed several possible reaction models based on existing reports, estimated the enthalpy change associated with the reaction by ab initio calculations, and identified promising elemental substitutions. The possible models were narrowed down by analyzing the correlations of the predicted dependence of the reaction enthalpies on elemental substitutions, compared between different reaction models. According to this model, substitution by P and Ta affords the highest enthalpy barrier between the initial (layered rocksalt) and the final (cubic rocksalt) structures but promotes the initial transformation to spinel as a degradation. Substitution by W instead generates the barrier to the final (preventing dangerous incidents) process, as well as for the initial degradation to spinel; therefore, it is a promising strategy to suppress the predicted pyrolysis.