Dynamic orthognathic surgical procedure (DOSP) in asymmetric maxillomandibular dysmorphism secondary to unilateral micrognathia: Outcomes of 12 consecutive cases.

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following a dynamic orthognathic surgical procedure performed at the end of growth to treat asymmetric maxillomandibular deformities linked to unilateral micrognathia when conventional orthognathic surgery was not feasible. The dynamic orthognathic surgical procedure (DOSP) combined concomitant mandibular distraction osteogenesis with contralateral poorly stabilized sagittal split osteotomy and Le Fort I osteotomy. Cephalometric studies were retrospectively conducted on pre- and postoperative lateral and frontal cephalographs, and maxillomandibular movements were calculated. Outcome scores were computed by both experts and laypersons based on photographic analyses. There was a significant postoperative increase in height of the micrognathic ramus in all patients (n = 12; p = 0.002). The angle between the occlusal cant and horizontal reference plane decreased significantly in all of the patients, as did the angle between the midline sagittal plane and mandibular tilt (p < 0.001). Postoperative outcome scores showed significant improvements in all cases, according to both expert and layperson groups. This procedure allows correction of maxillomandibular asymmetries linked to micrognathia. However, it cannot resolve all the factors participating in facial asymmetry, such as those originating in the oculo-auriculo-ventricular spectrum or complex tumor sequelae, and second-step procedures may be required.

Contribution of a better maxillofacial phenotype in Silver-Russell syndrome to define a better orthodontics and surgical management.

INTRODUCTION: Maxillofacial phenotype for SRS is incompletely described in literature. The aim of this study was to describe a maxillofacial phenotype for SRS, to determine a better treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including 37 patients with SRS. 24-control patients had been included and appareled. The subjective clinical examination included analyzes of SRS defined criteria. Frontal and lateral photographs had been reviewed, according to Farkas analysis; dental photographs had been examined for the deep-bite and the crowding severity. Radiologic cephalometric analysis had been reviewed. RESULTS: Maxillofacial examination showed protruding forehead (55%), anteverted ears (55%) and low-set ears (16%), small triangular face (48%); retrognatia (29%) and micrognathia (13%). SSR patients presented a lower forehead transverse growth, forehead height, and higher sagittal and transverse mandibular growth than control patients. Deep-bite was present in 21 patients of patient, and crowding in 17 patients. Cephalometric analysis showed 18 patients with the skeletal class II. We did not note a correlation between sleep apnea and retrognatia, neither between genetic anomalies and craniofacial phenotype. CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed new SRS characteristics: small forehead, small mandible, skeletal class II and a dental phenotype, leading to a specific maxillofacial and orthopedic management.

[Craniofacial strategy for syndromic craniosynostosis]. / Stratégie craniofaciale pour les faciocraniosténoses.

The complexity of treatment of faciocraniosynostosis justifies the treatment in a reference center for rare diseases. The growth disturbances in the skull and face being variable according to the type of mutation in the FGFr (Crouzon, Pfeiffer, Apert), the strategy is adapted to the phenotype according to the following principles: posterior expansion with or without distraction around 6 months to limit the descent of the cerebellum tonsils and to prevent the turricephalic development; fronto-facial monobloc advancement with internal distraction around the age of 18 months in case of severe exorbitism or breathing impairment. The dissociated strategy (fronto-orbital advancement first, followed by facial osteotomy of Le Fort 3 type). The growing evolution dictates the sequence of subsequent surgeries according to the monitoring of intracranial pressure by fundus examination and of the respiration by polysomnography. Le Fort 3 and transversal maxillary distraction may be repeated if necessary. Orthognathic surgery is almost always compulsory after the age of 14, before the aesthetic refinements which can be undertaken ultimately (rhinoplasty, genioplasty, canthopexies, fat grafting…).

[Functional treatment of children subcondylar fractures: An axiographic assessment]. / Traitement fonctionnel des fractures sous-condyliennes de l'enfant : une évaluation axiographique.

INTRODUCTION: Subcondylar fractures are common in children. Occlusion disorders resulting from these fractures in deciduous or mixed dentition do not have as much impact as in adults due to alveolar adaption possibilities. Functional treatment allows for good functional results, but does not treat the dynamic shortening of the ramus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the axiographic condylar slope changes after subcondylar fracture in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from 2010 to 2015, including all the under-18 patients presenting with a subcondylar fracture. Examination by mean of a Quick Axis axiograph measured the length of propulsion and the condylar inclination on both sides. The main evaluation criterion was the amount of condylar inclination decrease on the fractured side. RESULTS: Twelve patients (mean age: 10.42; 5-16) were included. Eleven children had a loss of condylar inclination on the fractured side without occlusion disorders at 33.2 months on average (3-144 months) after the initial trauma. Only one patient had symmetric axiographies without loss of condylar inclination on the fractured side. DISCUSSION: Dynamic shortening of the ramus on the side of the subcondylar fracture is consistent at short and medium terms in children. Surgical treatment may be the solution for avoiding this dynamic disorder of the mandible and should be evaluated.

Maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis in growing patients: lessons learned after 14 years and update on indications.

In the past decade, distraction osteogenesis (DO) has become increasingly popular and has opened new therapeutic perspectives for the treatment of numerous congenital and acquired craniofacial skeletal anomalies. However, DO mechanisms still remain unclear and different treatment protocols are applied by different groups. Here the authors use their 14 years-clinical experience to evaluate DO parameters such as maxillary and mandibular DO stability over time, especially in growing patients, DO effects on soft tissues and the correlation between the bone gain and lengthening capabilities of the device. Based on these data, clinical indications and treatment protocols for mandibular and maxillary DO are suggested. The application of DO to the membranous bones of the craniofacial skeleton has opened a new chapter in the surgical treatment of several congenital and acquired craniofacial deformities. Based on this experience, the authors recommend DO indications guidelines in selected cases of hemifacial microsomia, maxillary hypoplasia and narrow mandible with anterior dental crowding.

[Maxillary sequels in labial-alveolar-velopalatine clefts. Role of distraction osteogenesis]. / Les séquelles maxillaires dans les fentes labioalvéolopalatovélaires. Place de la distraction ostéogénique.

A high rate of cleft patients present with maxillary hypoplasia. Most of the growth defects concern the anteroposterior axis of the maxilla. Before bone lengthening by distraction osteogenesis, orthognathic surgery was the only alternative treatment for maxillary hypoplasia. Several studies showed the lack of stability after conventional surgery. In this article reviewing the literature concerning all bone lengthening procedures, the authors discuss published data on maxillary distraction osteogenesis by external and internal devices. Indications of distraction in growing children as an interceptive step are discussed.

[Mandibular advancement: osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis? A case report]. / Avancement mandibulaire: ostéotomie ou distraction? A propos d'un cas clinique.

From an experience in osteogenic distraction techniques acquired since 1993 and facing a case of retromandible, the authors have tried to define the criteria leading them to suggest a distraction rather a classical surgical procedure. The selection of the patient is based upon the age, the significance of the advancement, the asymmetry of the advancement and the former existence of a temporomandibular joint degenerative disease. Monitoring the distraction, in particular with per- and post-distraction orthodontics, remains complicated. The overcorrection and the reduction of recurrences after advancement using distraction remain openly discussed.

[Hemifacial microsomia treated with mandibular lengthening using intraoral distractors. On precise indications]. / Microsomies hémifaciales et distraction mandibulaire intra-orale. Vers des indications précises.

Mandibular hypoplasia in the hemifacial microsomia have largely benefited from distraction techniques especially intraoral. In fact, these techniques are possible in the child, replacing him in a better morphological, psychological and functional configuration. They can redynamise growth and, in any case, diminish secondary distant effects. The authors, from precise criteria, propose a surgical classification to facilitate the therapeutic decision. Intraoral and sometimes bidirectional distraction, whose results are equivalent to external distraction, present numerous advantages that, in the majority of cases, make it preferred now to external distraction. Its three-dimensional (3D) effect on bone and soft tissues and the long term follow-up must be evaluated more objectively, as pre and post-distraction stereolithographic or 3D photogrammetric may get. It must be considered in the child as the first step of skeletic surgery preparing to a facilitated second step orthopedic, orthodontic or orthognathic after puberty. In the young adult, it is in competition with conventional surgery but the slow progressive process, kind with the temporo-mandibular joints, allows in mandibular asymmetries an adaptation having avoided the need for controlateral osteotomy or a bone graft.

Intraoral mandibular distraction: indications, technique and long-term results.

This report describes the experience of the Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France, with distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using an intraoral distraction device. From 1993 to 1998, 26 paediatric patients with mandibular hypoplasia underwent distraction of the mandible using the Leibinger Intraoral Distractor. The majority of the patients had hemifacial microsomia. Distraction was performed at a rate of 1 mm a day following complete osteotomy of the mandible. A mean of 15 mm of distraction was obtained. In conjunction with combined orthodontic management, satisfactory morphologic results were achieved in the majority of patients with good facial symmetry, adequate occlusal relationships and balanced maxillary mandibular relationships. Radiographic evaluation revealed that substantial new bone formation and remodelling was induced by the intraoral distraction along the entire hemimandible on the distracted side and that this contributed significantly to the aesthetically pleasing clinical results.