Tumor Budding Assessment in Colorectal Carcinoma: Normalization Revisited.

Tumor budding (TB) is a powerful prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). An internationally standardized method for its assessment (International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference [ITBCC] method) has been adopted by most CRC pathology protocols. This method requires that TB counts are reported by field area (0.785 mm 2 ) rather than objective lens and a normalization factor is applied for this purpose. However, the validity of this approach is yet to be tested. We sought to validate the ITBCC method with a particular emphasis on normalization as a tool for standardization. In a cohort of 365 stage I-III CRC, both normalized and non-normalized TB were significantly associated with disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival ( P <0.0001). Examining both 0.95 and 0.785 mm 2 field areas in a subset of patients (n=200), we found that normalization markedly overcorrects TB counts: Counts obtained in a 0.95 mm 2 hotspot field were reduced by an average of 17.5% following normalization compared with only 3.8% when counts were performed in an actual 0.785 mm 2 field. This resulted in 45 (11.3%) cases being downgraded using ITBCC grading criteria following normalization, compared with only 5 cases (1.3%, P =0.0007) downgraded when a true 0.785 mm 2 field was examined. In summary, the prognostic value of TB was retained regardless of whether TB counts in a 0.95 mm 2 field were normalized. Normalization resulted in overcorrecting TB counts with consequent downgrading of most borderline cases. This has implications for risk stratification and adjuvant treatment decisions, and suggests the need to re-evaluate the role of normalization in TB assessment.

A Novel Combined Tumor Budding-Poorly Differentiated Clusters Grading System Predicts Recurrence and Survival in Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer.

Tumor budding (TB) and poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) are powerful prognostic factors in colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite their morphologic and biological overlap, TB and PDC are assessed separately and are distinguished by an arbitrary cutoff for cell cluster size. This cutoff can be challenging to apply in practice and its biological significance remains unclear. We developed a novel scoring system that incorporates TB and PDC into a single parameter ("Combined Score"; CS), eliminating the need for such cutoffs and allowing the prognostic value of PDC to be captured alongside TB. In a cohort of 481 stage I-III CRC resections, CS was significantly associated with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, T-stage, N-stage, histologic grade, tumor deposits, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion ( P <0.0001). In addition, CS was significantly associated with decreased 5-year recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and disease-specific survival ( P <0.0001). TB and PDC showed similar associations with oncologic outcomes, with hazard ratios consistently lower than for CS. The association between CS and oncologic outcomes remained significant in subgroup analyses stratified by AJCC stage, anatomic location (rectum/colon) and neoadjuvant therapy status. On multivariable analysis, CS retained its significant association with oncologic outcomes ( P =0.0002, 0.005, and 0.009) for recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival, respectively. In conclusion, CS provides powerful risk stratification in CRC which is at least equivalent to that of TB and PDC assessed individually. If validated elsewhere, CS has practical advantages and a biological rationale that may make it an attractive alternative to assessing these features separately.