RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Satralizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, is approved in Japan for relapse prevention in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and is undergoing post-marketing surveillance (PMS) of clinical use. We aimed to describe the real-world safety and effectiveness of satralizumab in Japanese patients with NMOSD. METHODS: This is an ongoing PMS (planned completion: February 2027). This 6-month interim analysis assessed the safety and effectiveness of satralizumab in Japanese patients with NMOSD using data collected from August 2020 to July 2021. RESULTS: Among 570 patients who participated, 523 (91.75%) were female and the mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 52.4 ± 14.1 years. At baseline, NMOSD expanded disability status scale mean ± SD was 4.19 ± 2.19; 490 (85.96%) patients used glucocorticoids and 277 (48.59%) patients used immunosuppressants concomitantly. Of 570 satralizumab-treated patients, 85 (14.91%) had discontinued satralizumab treatment at 6 months. For the overall adverse drug reactions (ADRs), 76.22 (66.07-87.48) events/100 person-years occurred in 118 (20.70%) patients, and infections occurred in 28 (4.91%) patients. Serious infections occurred in 18 (3.15%) patients, with an event rate of 9.05 (5.80-13.47) events/100 person-years. Of the 24 events of serious infections, respiratory tract infections (29.17%; 7) and urinary tract infections (25.00%; 6) were the most common serious infection events. One fatal ADR (septic shock) suspected to be related to satralizumab was reported. The mean ± SD glucocorticoid dose reduced from 12.28 ± 10.17 mg/day at the index date to 8.11 ± 7.30 mg/day at 6 months. The Kaplan-Meier cumulative relapse-free rate (95% confidence interval) was 94.59% (92.25-96.23) at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In this study, satralizumab was found to be safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients with NMOSD in routine clinical practice. The results are consistent with those of previous clinical trials. The safety and effectiveness of satralizumab in Japanese patients with NMOSD will be analyzed over the 6-year surveillance period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000041047.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Attitudes of healthcare professionals regarding spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Japan are not well known, and Japan's unique system of surveillance, called early post-marketing phase vigilance (EPPV), may affect these reporting attitudes. Our objectives were to describe potential effects of EPPV and to test whether ADR seriousness, prominence, and frequency are related to changes in reporting over time. METHODS: A manufacturer's database of spontaneous ADR reports was used to extract data from individual case safety reports for 5 drugs subject to EPPV. The trend of reporting and the time lag between ADR onset and reporting to the manufacturer were examined. The following indices for ADRs occurring with each drug were calculated and analyzed to assess reporting trends: Serious:Non-serious ratio, High prominence:Low prominence ratio, and High frequency:Low frequency ratio. RESULTS: For all 5 drugs, the time lag between ADR onset and reporting to the manufacturer was shorter in the EPPV period than in the post-EPPV period. All drugs showed higher Serious:Non-serious ratios in the post-EPPV period. No specific patterns were observed for the High prominence:Low prominence ratio. The High frequency:Low frequency ratio for peginterferon alpha-2a and sevelamer hydrochloride decreased steadily throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals may be more likely to report serious ADRs than to report non-serious ADRs, but the effect of event prominence on reporting trends is still unclear. Factors associated with ADR reporting attitude in Japan might be different from those in other countries because of EPPV and the involvement of medical representatives in the spontaneous reporting process. Pharmacovigilance specialists should therefore be cautious when comparing data between different time periods or different countries. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanism of spontaneous ADR reporting in Japan.
