Development of beat-by-beat blood pressure monitoring device and nocturnal sec-surge detection algorithm.

The nocturnal blood pressure (BP) surge in seconds (sec-surge) is defined as a brief, acute transient BP elevation over several tens of seconds, triggered by obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sympathetic hyperactivity. Sec-surge imposes a significant strain on the cardiovascular system, potentially triggering cardiovascular events. Quantitative evaluation of sec-surge level could be valuable in assessing cardiovascular risks. To accurately measure the detailed sec-surge, including its shape as BP rises and falls, we developed a beat-by-beat (BbB) BP monitoring device using tonometry. In addition, we developed an automatic sec-surge detection algorithm to help identify sec-surge cases in the overnight BbB BP data. The device and algorithm successfully detected sec-surges in patients with OSA. Our results demonstrated that sec-surge was associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and arterial stiffness independently of nocturnal BP level or variability. Sec-surge would be worth monitoring for assessing cardiovascular risks, in addition to nocturnal BP level. Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) surge in seconds (sec-surge) places heavy load on the cardiovascular system and can trigger cardiovascular events. To identify sec-surges, we developed a beat-by-beat BP monitoring device and a sec-surge detection algorithm. Furthermore, sec-surge was more related to cardiovascular risks than conventional nocturnal BP parameters.

Home systolic blood pressure time in therapeutic range and cardiovascular risk: the practitioner-based nationwide J-HOP study extended.

Time in therapeutic range (TTR) for office systolic blood pressure (SBP) is an independent predictor of major cardiovascular events. However, the clinical implications of TTR for home SBP have not yet been investigated. This study determined the association between TTR of home SBP and cardiovascular events in individuals with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor who were enrolled in The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study. The therapeutic range for home SBP was defined as home SBP of 100-135 mmHg during the 13-day baseline period of the J-HOP study. Participants were divided into subgroups based on quartiles of TTR for home SBP, and the risk of cardiovascular events was determined in each quartile. During a mean 6.3 years of follow-up in 4070 participants (mean age 65 years), cardiovascular events included stroke in 92, coronary artery disease in 119, heart failure in 41 and aortic dissection in 8. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for the risk of total cardiovascular events in participants with home SBP TTR in the lowest (100%) versus highest quartile (<15.3%) was 1.74 (1.16-2.61); the corresponding hazard ratio for stroke events was 2.11 (1.06-4.21). A 10% decrease in home SBP TTR was associated with a 4% increase in the risk of total cardiovascular events (p = 0.033) and a 9% increase in the risk of stroke (p = 0.004). The significant association seen between home SBP TTR and the occurrence of cardio- and cerebrovascular events highlights the importance of achieving stable reductions in home SBP and minimizing day-by-day home BP variability.Clinical Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000000894 (J-HOP study).

Daily self-reported behavioural efficacy records on hypertension digital therapeutics as digital metrics associated with the reduction in morning home blood pressure: post-hoc analysis of HERB-DH1 trial.

Digital therapeutics for hypertension, proven effective in the HERB-DH1 trial, enable patients to record and track their daily actions and achievements to improve their lifestyles using an app. However, the association between recording daily behaviours and blood pressure (BP) reduction has not yet been investigated. We conducted a post-hoc analysis to investigate the relationship between them in the HERB-DH1 trial. We defined the counts of daily records of antihypertensive behaviour taken by the patient into the app as daily self-reported behavioural efficacy records (SER). SER was categorised into quartiles, and the trend of changes from baseline to week 12 in morning home systolic blood pressure (SBP), salt intake checklist score, and body weight was assessed. A total of 156 patients with hypertension were included in the analysis. A higher total count of SER was associated with greater SBP reduction (P for trend: 0.049). Patients with a higher SER for salt intake and weight reduction showed reductions in SBP (P for trend: 0.034 and 0.027, respectively). Furthermore, patients with higher salt intake SER exhibited a decrease in the salt intake checklist scores, and patients with greater weight reduction SER experienced a reduction in body weight (P for trend: 0.001 and 0.007, respectively). SER during digital therapeutics is associated with a reduction in morning home SBP in patients with hypertension. Enhancing patients' intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy, as evaluated by the SER, can play an important role in reducing BP by promoting lifestyle improvement. Daily self-reported behavioural efficacy records (SER) defined as the number of patient's app inputs of recall of day-by-day activity of behaviours at the end of the day, is partially affected by self-efficacy and affinity of app, resulting in the effectiveness of digital therapeutics.

2023 update and perspectives.

Total 276 manuscripts were published in Hypertension Research in 2022. Here our editorial members picked up the excellent papers, summarized the current topics from the published papers and discussed future perspectives in the sixteen fields. We hope you enjoy our special feature, 2023 update and perspectives in Hypertension Research.

Agreement Between Guideline Thresholds Using an "All-in-One" Device to Measure Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressures.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) thresholds for diagnosing and managing hypertension vary for office, home, and ambulatory readings, and between guideline documents. This analysis determined corresponding office, home, and ambulatory BP thresholds using baseline data from the HI-JAMP (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) study, which used a validated "all-in-one" BP monitoring device. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 2322 treated patients with hypertension who underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days were analyzed. Corresponding BP thresholds for office, home, and ambulatory measurements were determined using Deming regression. Values equivalent to office systolic BP (SBP) of 120 and 140 mm Hg were as follows: 115.9 and 127.7 mm Hg for 24-hour ambulatory SBP; 120.8 and 134.0 mm Hg for daytime ambulatory SBP; 104.9 and 117.9 mm Hg for nighttime ambulatory SBP; and 122.0 and 134.2 mm Hg for morning-evening average home SBP. Deming regression showed that morning-evening average home SBP and daytime ambulatory SBP were almost the same (home SBP=0.99×daytime ambulatory SBP+0.27 mm Hg; r=0.627). Morning-evening average home SBP values of 120 and 135 mm Hg were equivalent to daytime ambulatory SBP values of 119.1 and 133.9 mm Hg, respectively. A home SBP threshold of 130 mm Hg corresponded to 24-hour and nighttime ambulatory SBP values of 123.5 and 113.6 mm Hg, whereas a home SBP threshold of 135 mm Hg corresponded to 24-hour and nighttime ambulatory SBP values of 128.0 and 119.2 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory and home BP thresholds in this analysis were similar to those proposed by existing guidelines. The similarity between the home BP and daytime ambulatory BP thresholds was a clinically relevant finding.

The HOPE Asia Network consensus on blood pressure measurements corresponding to office measurements: Automated office, home, and ambulatory blood pressures.

For adopting recently introduced hypertension phenotypes categorized using office and out of office blood pressure (BP) for the diagnosis of hypertension and antihypertension drug therapy, it is mandatory to define the corresponding out of office BP with the specific target BP recommended by the major guidelines. Such conditions include white-coat hypertension (WCH), masked hypertension (MH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), and masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH). Here, the authors review the relevant literature and discuss the related issue to facilitate the use of corresponding BPs for proper diagnosis of WCH, MH, WUCH, and MUCH in the setting of standard target BP as well as intensive target BP. The methodology of deriving the corresponding BP has evolved from statistical methods such as standard deviation, percentile value, and regression to an outcome-based approach using pooled international cohort study data and comparative analysis in randomized clinical trials for target BPs such as the SPRINT and STEP studies. Corresponding BPs to 140/90 and 130/80 mm Hg in office BP is important for safe and strict achievement of intensive BP targets. The corresponding home, daytime, and 24-h BPs to 130/80 mm Hg in office BP are 130/80, 130/80, and 125/75 mm Hg, respectively. However, researchers have found some discrepancies among the home corresponding BPs. As tentative criterion for de-escalation of antihypertensive therapy as shown in European guidelines was 120 mm Hg in office BP, corresponding home, daytime, and 24-h systolic BPs to 120 mm Hg in office systolic BP are 120, 120, and 115 mm Hg, respectively.

Different Home Blood Pressure Thresholds to Predict Perfect 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control in Treated Hypertension Based on an "All-in-One" Device.

BACKGROUND: Home blood pressure (BP) is an important component of digital strategies for hypertension management. However, no studies have used the same device to investigate 24-hour BP control status in relation to different home BP control thresholds. METHODS: Participants in the general practitioner-based, multicenter HI-JAMP study (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days. A validated all-in-one BP monitoring device was used to measure office, home, and ambulatory BP. Baseline data were used to investigate ambulatory BP control status in individuals with well-controlled home BP based on the different guideline thresholds (125/75 mm Hg, 130/80 mm Hg, and 135/85 mm Hg). RESULTS: Data from 2269 patients were analyzed. For individuals with well-controlled home BP <135/85 mm Hg (59.5% of the total population), the prevalence of uncontrolled 24-hour (≥130/80 mm Hg), daytime (≥135/85 mm Hg), and nighttime ambulatory BP (≥120/70 mm Hg) was 19.9%, 18.5%, and 33.6%, respectively. Corresponding prevalence rates in the 42.7% of participants with well-controlled home BP <130/80 mm Hg were 13.4%, 12.9%, and 26.0%, and when well-controlled home BP was strictly defined as <125/75 mm Hg (23.9% of the population), prevalence of rates of uncontrolled 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP were 7.0%, 9.0%, and 15.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Home BP control status defined using different thresholds could predict 24-hour ambulatory BP control status in treated hypertension. One-third of individuals still had uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension when home BP was controlled to <135/85 mm Hg, but ambulatory BP was quite well controlled when home BP was <125/75 mm Hg.

Home blood pressure-centered approach - from digital health to medical practice: HOPE Asia Network consensus statement 2023.

Recent innovations in digital technology have enabled the simultaneous accumulation, and the linking and analysis of time-series big data relating to several factors that influence blood pressure (BP), including biological indicators, physical activity, and environmental information. Various approaches can be used to monitor BP: in the office/clinic; at home; 24-h ambulatory recording; or with wearable and cuffless devices. Of these, home BP monitoring is a reliable and convenient method, and is recommended for hypertension management by current national and international guidelines. This recommendation is based on evidence showing that home BP is an important predictor of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and kidney disease in patients with hypertension. In addition, lifetime personalized health record (PHR)-based home BP with telemonitoring combined with co-interventions has been shown to lower BP more effectively than the traditional approach based on office BP. Thus, home BP represents a key metric for personalized anticipation medicine, from digital healthcare to digital medicine. This paper summarizes the latest evidence on home BP monitoring and proposes a Hypertension Cardiovascular Outcome Prevention and Evidence in Asia (HOPE Asia) Network consensus on a home BP-centered approach to the management of hypertension.

Peak home blood pressure as an earlier and strong novel risk factor for stroke: the practitioner-based nationwide J-HOP study extended.

While home blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended for hypertension management, the clinical implications of peak home BP values have not been well studied. This study investigated the association between pathological threshold or frequency of peak home BP and cardiovascular events in patients with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor. The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study enrolled participants from 2005-2012 with extended follow-up from December 2017 to May 2018, which generated the dataset for this analysis. Average peak home systolic BP (SBP) was defined as average of the highest three BP values on 14-day measurement period. Patients were divided into quintiles of peak home BP, and the risk of stroke, coronary artery disease (CAD) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD; stroke+CAD) was determined. In 4231 patients (mean 65 years) followed for 6.2 years there were 94 strokes and 124 CAD events. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for the risk of stroke and ASCVD in patients with average peak home SBP in the highest versus lowest quintile was 4.39 (1.85-10.43) and 2.04 (1.24-3.36), respectively. Risk was greatest for stroke in the first 5 years: HR 22.66 (2.98-172.1). The pathological threshold of average peak home SBP for 5-year stroke risk was 176 mmHg. There was a linear association between the number of times peak home SBP > 175 mmHg and stroke risk. Peak home BP was a strong risk factor for stroke, especially within the first 5 years. We propose exaggerated peak home SBP > 175 mmHg as an early and strong novel risk factor for stroke.

Nocturnal blood pressure surge in seconds is associated with arterial stiffness independently of conventional nocturnal blood pressure variability in suspected obstructive sleep apnea patients.

Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) surge in seconds (sec-surge), which is characterized as acute transient BP elevation over several tens of seconds is induced by obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and OSA-related sympathetic hyperactivity. The authors assessed the relationship between sec-surge and arterial stiffness in 34 nocturnal hypertensive patients with suspected OSA (mean age 63.9 ± 12.6 years, 32.4% female). During the night, they had beat-by-beat (BbB) BP and cuff-oscillometric BP measurements, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) was assessed as an arterial stiffness index. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the upward duration (UD) of sec-surge was significantly associated with baPWV independently of nocturnal oscillometric systolic BP variability (ß = .365, p = .046). This study suggests that the UD of sec-surge, which can only be measured using a BbB BP monitoring device, may be worth monitoring in addition to nocturnal BP level.

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of digital therapeutics in hypertension: impact of body weight and salt intake.

Lifestyle modifications, including body weight reduction and salt restriction, help reduce blood pressure (BP). This study investigated the effects of body mass index (BMI) and salt intake on home BP reductions in unmedicated patients with hypertension receiving guideline-based lifestyle modification from doctors (control group) or with the addition of a digital therapeutics intervention. Data from the HERB Digital Hypertension 1 (HERB-DH1) pivotal trial were analyzed. Home BP was measured for 7 days before each study visit (baseline, and 4/8/12 weeks). Body weight was measured at each visit and salt intake questionnaire was answered at baseline and 12 weeks. This analysis included 302 patients with sufficient home BP monitoring data (digital therapeutics: 156; control group: 146). The reduction in morning home SBP from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater in the digital therapeutics vs. control group for patients with baseline BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and higher salt intake group (self-reported salt intake score ≥ 14) (-5.1 mmHg, p < 0.01). Patients in the digital therapeutics group who experienced a reduction in BMI and an improvement in salt intake score during the 12-week study also had a significantly greater reduction in morning home SBP compared with patients in the control group (-7.2 mmHg, p < 0.01). The digital therapeutic intervention reduced home BP the most in unmedicated patients with hypertension with high baseline BMI and salt intake score. Those with improvements in both BMI and salt intake during the digital therapeutics intervention achieved the greatest reduction in home BP vs. control.Clinical trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2032190148).

The effect of psychological stress and physical activity on ambulatory blood pressure variability detected by a multisensor ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device.

Psychological stress and physical activity contribute to blood pressure (BP) variability, which is a significant and independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. We examined the effects of physical activity level in the 5 min before each BP measurement and psychological stress on ambulatory BP and pulse rate variability in daily life. During a 24 h monitoring period, BP and pulse rate were measured by a multisensor ABPM device (TM-2441; A&D Co.) at 30 min intervals, and physical activity was continuously recorded by an actigraph built into the ABPM device. Psychological stress was assessed from negative emotions or worksite location in the participants' situational information at each BP measurement, which was self-reported on a paper pad immediately (or as soon as possible) after the measurement. A total of 642 ABPM readings with corresponding situational information were obtained from 50 high-risk patients and showed that BP and pulse rate were significantly associated with actigraph-recorded physical activity (increase against the physical-activity-above-walking level: 4.2 ± 2.0 mmHg, p = 0.036 for SBP; 5.4 ± 1.1 bpm, p < 0.001 for pulse rate). When self-reported situational factors were additionally included in the analysis model as variables, negative emotions (7.4 ± 2.5 mmHg, p = 0.003 for SBP) and worksite location (5.8 ± 2.1 mmHg, p = 0.005 for SBP) were significantly associated with BP increase, while the association between BP and physical activity was weakened (p > 0.05). The pulse rate increased against the physical-activity-above-walking level but did not change for negative emotions. In conclusion, the effect of negative emotions on BP was greater than that of physical activity, whereas no similar effect on pulse rate was found. Simultaneous monitoring of BP, pulse rate, and actigraph-recorded physical activity could detect psychological stress-induced BP elevation.

Concept, study design, and baseline blood pressure control status of the nationwide prospective HI-JAMP study using multisensor ABPM.

The Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology (ICT)-based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective (HI-JAMP) study is a nationwide general practitioner-based cohort of medicated hypertensive patients that began in 2017. The primary objective of this study is to clarify which blood pressure (BP) measure is the best predictor of cardiovascular disease: office, home, or ambulatory BP. To this end, we used a newly developed ICT-based multisensor ambulatory BP monitoring (IMS-ABPM) device (TM-2441; A&D Company), which can also be used for home BP monitoring and is equipped with a high-sensitivity actigraph, a thermometer, and a barometer. This is the first study to evaluate three hemodynamic properties under resting home and active ambulatory conditions using the same device: (1) BP variability; (2) trigger-specific BP sensitivity to physical activity, temperature, and atmospheric pressure; and (3) central hemodynamics. A total of 2754 patients were enrolled, and 2731 patients with the required number of ambulatory BP readings (at least 6 daytime and 3 nighttime readings) were included in the final analysis. The overall patient group showed worse control of morning and nighttime BPs compared to office and daytime BPs, and the control rate was also poor among patients with a higher number of antihypertensive drugs. In conclusion, the baseline data of the HI-JAMP study demonstrated that morning home and nighttime BP remain difficult to control even among patients taking two or more hypertensive agents. By simultaneously considering office, home, and ambulatory BPs, the HI-JAMP study will contribute to the development of hypertension management strategies and new BP indices.

Maximum ambulatory daytime blood pressure and risk of stroke in individuals with higher ambulatory arterial stiffness index: the JAMP study.

The aim of this study was to determine whether a high daytime maximum blood pressure (BP) assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) constitutes a risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events, especially in those with increased arterial stiffness, because BP variability is linked to arterial stiffness. A total of 6294 participants (mean age, 68.6 ± 11.7 years; 78% treated hypertensive patients), who had at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor, were followed for 4.5 years. Daytime maximum BP was calculated as the highest 1-hour moving average of 2 consecutive systolic BP (SBP) readings during the daytime. The ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) was calculated as 1 minus the slope of the linear regression line between SBP and diastolic BP during 24-hour BP. During the follow-up, there were 217 ASCVD events (119 stroke and 98 coronary artery disease [CAD]). In the higher-AASI group (≥0.5783), subjects in the top quartile of daytime maximum SBP (≥179.4 mmHg) had a greater risk of stroke events compared to those in other quartiles (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-3.15). In the higher-AASI group, participants with 24-hour SBP of 130 mmHg or more and in the top quartile of daytime maximum SBP had an adjusted HR (95%CI) of 2.55 (1.32-4.95) compared to those without. The analysis did not suggest that daytime maximum SBP posed a risk for CAD events and in the lower-AASI group. Daytime maximum SBP did pose a risk of stroke events, especially for those with higher arterial stiffness represented as AASI.

Diagnostic agreement of masked uncontrolled hypertension detected by ambulatory blood pressure and home blood pressure measured by an all-in-one BP monitoring device: The HI-JAMP study.

Masked hypertension is defined by office blood pressure (BP) in the controlled-BP range while out-of-office BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM) is in the uncontrolled range. However, diagnosis of masked hypertension may differ if assessed by different out-of-office BP indices. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic agreement of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUHT) detected by ABPM indices (ABPM-MUHT) and HBPM indices (HBPM-MUHT) using the same all-in-one device (TM2441; A&D Company). The present study enrolled a total of 2322 treated hypertensive patients (males 53.2%, average age 69.2 ± 11.5 years) from the Home-Activity ICT-based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective (HI-JAMP) Study, who consecutively underwent office BP monitoring, 24-h ABPM (at 30-min intervals), and 5-day HBPM (twice each morning and evening) using the same device. When out-of-office BP control status was assessed only by 24-h average SBP or by the average of morning and evening SBP, the diagnostic agreement of MUHT detected by ABPM and HBPM was 29.7% among the 445 patients with any type of MUHT. When out-of-office BP indices in each time-window were simultaneously assessed, the diagnostic agreement increased to 40-45.7%. Our results indicated the importance of assessing BPs at various times of day, especially morning hours, for perfect hypertension management. Diagnosis of masked hypertension only by an averaged BP index, without considering specific time-windows, might underestimate cardiovascular risk.

Inconsistent Control Status of Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure All Taken Using the Same Device: The HI-JAMP Study Baseline Data.

BACKGROUND: Inconsistencies between the office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) values (described as white-coat hypertension or masked hypertension) may be attributable in part to differences in the BP monitoring devices used. METHODS: We studied consistency in the classification of BP control (well-controlled BP vs. uncontrolled BP) among office, home, and ambulatory BPs by using a validated "all-in-one" BP monitoring device. In the nationwide, general practitioner-based multicenter HI-JAMP study, 2,322 hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive drugs underwent office BP measurements and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), consecutively followed by 5-day home BP monitoring (HBPM), for a total of seven BP measurement days. RESULTS: Using the thresholds of the JSH2019 and ESC2018 guidelines, the patients with consistent classification of well-controlled status in the office (<140 mmHg) and home systolic BP (SBP) (<135 mmHg) (n = 970) also tended to have well-controlled 24-hour SBP (<130 mmHg) (n = 808, 83.3%). The patients with the consistent classification of uncontrolled status in office and home SBP (n = 579) also tended to have uncontrolled 24-hour SBP (n = 444, 80.9%). Among the patients with inconsistent classifications of office and home BP control (n = 803), 46.1% had inconsistent ABPM-vs.-HBPM out-of-office BP control status. When the 2017 ACC/AHA thresholds were applied as an alternative, the results were essentially the same. CONCLUSIONS: The combined assessment of the office and home BP is useful in clinical practice. Especially for patients whose office BP classification and home BP classification conflict, the complementary clinical use of both HBPM and ABPM might be recommended.