Differential Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical Activity Involvements and Exercise Habits in People With and Without Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize evidence regarding differential changes in physical activity (PA) involvements and exercise habits in people with and without chronic diseases during the COVID-19 outbreak. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched from November 2019 to May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that investigated changes in PA-related outcomes in people with and without chronic diseases during the pandemic. DATA EXTRACTION: PA-related outcomes and sedentary time were extracted from the included studies. Relevant risk of bias were assessed. Meta-analyses were conducted for each PA-related outcome, if applicable. Quality of evidence of each PA-related outcome was evaluated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 1226 identified citations, 36 articles (28 with and 8 without chronic diseases) with 800,256 participants were included. Moderate evidence from wearable sensors supported a significant reduction in pooled estimates of step count (standardized mean differences [SMD]=-2.79, P<.01). Very limited to limited evidence substantiated significant decreases in self-reported PA-related outcomes and significant increases in sedentary behaviors among people with and without chronic diseases. Specifically, pooled estimates of metabolic equivalent-minute per week (SMD=-0.16, P=.02) and PA duration (SMD=-0.07, P<.01) were significantly decreased, while sedentary time (SMD=0.09, P=.04) showed significant increases in the general population (small to large effects). Very limited evidence suggested no significant PA changes among people in a country without lockdown. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, objective and self-reported assessments showed significant reductions in PA in people with and without chronic diseases globally. This mainly occurred in countries with lockdowns. Although many countries have adopted the "live with the coronavirus" policy, authorities should implement population-based strategies to revert the potential lockdown-related long-term deleterious effects on people's health.

Measurement properties of walking outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Selecting a walking outcome measure for neurogenic claudication requires knowledge of its measurement properties. PURPOSE: To systematically review and appraise the literature on the measurement properties of walking outcome measures for patients with neurogenic claudication. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on the following seven databases: PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Clinical studies that assessed a measurement property of a walking outcome measure for patients with neurogenic claudication were selected. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Measurement property results were assessed using the adapted criteria from Terwee et al. (2007). RESULTS: Twelve studies that evaluated 15 separate walking outcome measures were included. Out of the 12 studies included, half had poor methodological quality. Four measures had acceptable test-retest reliability: the self-paced walking test (intraclass correlation coefficient, or ICC was 0.98, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99), Physical Function Scale (PFS) (pooled analysis ICC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89), PFS walk item (ICC = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.89), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) walk item (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). Responsiveness was assessed on five walking outcome measures, and three had adequate responsiveness: the ODI walk item (Area under the Curve, or AUC, was 0.76, SD 0.15), Treadmill test (AUC = 0.70), and PFS (AUC = 0.77, SD 0.14). A meta-analysis demonstrated the PFS had adequate test retest reliability (pooled ICC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89) and internal consistency (pooled Cronbach's αlpha (α) = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.81-0.86), but not criterion validity (pooled correlation coefficient = -0.59, 95% CI: -0.71, -0.45). Measures that recorded adequate criterion validity were the ODI walk item (pooled correlation coefficient = -0.71, 95% CI: -0.80, -0.58), Treadmill test (pooled correlation coefficient = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.91), and self predicted walking item (pooled correlation coefficient = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our systematic review demonstrated that high-quality studies that asses the measurement properties of walking outcome measures for patients with neurogenic claudication are lacking. There was only limited evidence available for each walking measure, which prevented any single outcome from being confirmed as the gold standard measure of neurogenic claudication. Clinicians and researchers are recommended to use the self-paced walking test and ODI walk item until further evidence is available. Future research should focus on producing high-quality studies with excellent methodology and larger sample sizes.

The spinal stenosis pedometer and nutrition lifestyle intervention (SSPANLI): development and pilot.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Owing to mobility limitations, people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are at risk for diseases of inactivity, including obesity. Therefore, weight management in LSS is critical. Body mass index is the strongest predictor of function in LSS, suggesting that weight loss may promote physical activity and provide a unique treatment option. We propose a lifestyle modification approach of physical activity and nutrition education, delivered through an e-health platform. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot an e-health intervention aimed at increasing physical activity and decreasing fat mass in people with LSS. STUDY DESIGN: The study design was based on intervention development and pilot. PATIENT SAMPLE: Ten overweight or obese individuals with LSS were confirmed clinically and on imaging. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported measures were food record, Short-Form 36 (SF-36), pain scales, Swiss Spinal Stenosis Symptom and Physical Function Scales, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Center for Epidemiologic Studies(Depression) Scale, Behavioral Regular in Exercise Questionnaire, and Regulation for Eating Behavior Scale and physiologic measures were dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), blood draw, 7-day accelerometry, self-paced walking test, and balance test. METHODS: The e-health platform was developed. INTERVENTION: during Week 1, participants received a pedometer and a personalized consultation with a dietitian and an exercise physiologist. For 12 weeks, participants logged on to the e-health Web site to access personal step goals, nutrition education videos, and a discussion board. Follow-up occurred at Week 13. RESULTS: Nine participants had a mean age of 67.5±6.7 years (60% women). Significant improvements were observed for fat mass (DXA), trunk fat mass, symptom severity (Swiss Symptom Scale), energy intake, maximum continuous activity (accelerometry), and mental health (SF-36) (p<.05). Nonsignificant improvements were observed for waist circumference, pain, ODI, and obesity biomarkers. Seventy percent lost weight, 50% increased walking capacity, and 60% increased quality of life. The mean increase in steps was 15%. CONCLUSIONS: The spinal stenosis pedometer and nutrition lifestyle intervention was shown to be feasible, attractive to participants, and effective in this small sample. This intervention provides people with LSS the opportunity to participate in their own health management, potentially improving access to care. Efficacy is currently being assessed in a randomized trial.

Survey of Canadian human anatomy courses in Kinesiology and Physical Education

Human anatomy is a requirement for program accreditation from the Canadian Council of Physical Education and Kinesiology Administrators (CCUPEKA). Fifteen out of nineteen CCUPEKA accredited programs participated in a pan-Canadian environmental scan to determine if their human anatomy course would be classified as either regional, systemic or some combination of these two methods. Two additional raters from another university and with university anatomy teaching experience blindly rated each CCUPEKA accredited anatomy course based on a course syllabus. An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated using the three raters to determine the reliability of such a classification system. Eight of fifteen professors classified their own course as a combination of regional and systemic anatomy. Three professors classified their course as regional and four classified their course as systemic. The reliability coefficient (ICC 2,k) was 0.48. Weak reliability is indicative of poor agreement on how each of the classification systems is defined. Future research should focus on agreement of a unified and accepted definition of these classifications. Then, more research can pursue the question of the best method to deliver this very important content to physical education and kinesiology undergraduate students

No disponible

Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Walking capacity is a primary outcome indicator for individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Therefore, there is a demand for psychometrically sound measures of walking that are responsive to change. PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to examine longitudinal construct validity of the Physical Function Scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (PF Scale), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the walking capacity items from these scales specifically for the assessment of walking capacity in LSS using the objective Self-Paced Walking Test (SPWT) as the external standard. A secondary objective was to examine responsiveness of measures of walking using a self-reported walking capacity change scale as the external criterion standard. STUDY DESIGN: Patients were prospectively enrolled. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twenty-six patients were included in this study (17 women and 9 men), with an average age of 68.5 years (SD, 9.2). All participants had LSS diagnosed by a spine specialist surgeon based on both clinical examination and imaging, as well as self-reported walking limitations (neurogenic claudication). OUTCOME MEASURES: The self-reported outcome measures included in this study were PF Scale, ODI, and self-reported walking capacity change score. FUNCTIONAL MEASURES: The functional measure used in the study was SPWT. METHODS: Longitudinal construct validity was assessed using the correlational method. Internal responsiveness was examined using Guyatt responsiveness index and external responsiveness using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Change in the SPWT and the self-reported walking capacity change score were used as external criteria for the analysis. RESULTS: The highest correlations with change in the SPWT were 0.78 for the ODI walking item and 0.78 for the walking capacity change score. Changes in the PF Scale and ODI score were correlated with change in the criterion SPWT at r=0.56 and r=0.70, respectively. There were no differences observed between the PF Scale and ODI for any of the responsiveness indices. CONCLUSIONS: The PF Scale, ODI, and walking capacity change score are able to detect changes in walking capacity in people with LSS. The individual walking capacity item from the ODI appears to be the most valid and responsive to changes in measured walking and may be a reasonable alternative for measuring walking when an objective test such as the SPWT is not feasible.

Pathoanatomical characteristics of clinical lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear picture of pathoanatomy in clinically diagnosed LSS. Findings in the literature regarding imaging in LSS are heterogeneous. OBJECTIVE: Characterize the pathoanatomy of LSS, as reported in the radiology reports, for a large community-based sample of patients with the clinical diagnosis of LSS. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical radiology reports. The sample comprised patients 40 years of age or older, with clinically diagnosed LSS. Radiology reports for lumbar MRI were obtained and data were extracted pertaining to the type and location of LSS. RESULTS: 173 subjects with a mean age of 66.2 ± 11.7 years were included (61% women). 68.2% had mixed stenosis, 19.1% had central stenosis only, and 12.7% had lateral stenosis only. By level, the most prevalent findings were at L4/5 (93%), L3/4 (66%) and L5/S1 (49%). This pattern was different in those with lateral stenosis only, where the proportion of findings at L5/S1 was higher than at L3/4. 156 subjects (90.2%) had findings of at least moderate severity. Considering moderate-severe findings only, 31% had mixed stenosis and 40.0% had multi-level findings (90.5% at adjacent segments). When mild findings were included for subjects with at least one moderate-severe finding the rate of mixed stenosis increased to 59%, and multi-level stenosis to 68.6%. The most common multi-level combinations were L3/4 and L4/5 for two-level stenosis and L2/3 through L4/5 for three-level. CONCLUSION: Results of this study confirm a number of pathoanatomical patterns in people diagnosed with LSS, including a high proportion of stenosis at L4/5, followed by L3/4 and L5/S1. Results also suggest a high prevalence of multi-level stenosis at adjacent segments. The prevalence of mixed stenosis varied from 31% to 68.2%; inclusion of mild findings resulted in a higher rate of both mixed and multi-level stenosis, compared to analysis of moderate-severe findings only. These results may guide future studies on LSS pathophysiology, by focusing attention toward the most prevalent radiological findings.

Does physical activity influence the relationship between low back pain and obesity?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Evidence supporting an association between obesity and low back pain (LBP) continues to grow; yet little is known about the cause and effect of this relationship. Even less is known about the mechanisms linking the two. Physical activity is a logical suspect, but no study has demonstrated its role. PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the interrelationship between physical activity, obesity, and LBP. The specific aims were to determine if obesity is a risk factor for LBP in the U.S. population, measure the strength of any observed association, and evaluate the role of physical activity in modulating this association. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A cross-sectional U.S. population-based study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A cohort of 6,796 adults from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic information, an in-depth health questionnaire, physical examination details, and 7-day free-living physical activity monitoring using accelerometry (ActiGraph AM-7164; ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA). METHODS: LBP status was determined by questionnaire response. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated during physical examination and divided here into four groups (normal weight <25, overweight 25-30, obese 31-35, and ultraobese 36+). Summary measures of physical activity were computed based on intensity cutoffs, percentile intensities, and bout. Demographics, social history, and comorbid health conditions were used to build adjusted weighted logistic regression models constructed using Akaike Information Criterion. All displayed estimates are significant at level <.05. No external funding was received to support this study. None of the authors report conflicts of interest directly related to the specific subject matter of this manuscript. RESULTS: In the U.S. population, the risk of low LBP increases in step with BMI from 2.9% for normal BMI (20-25) to 5.2% for overweight (26-30), 7.7% for obese (31-35), and 11.6% for ultraobese (36+). Smoking is consistently the strongest predictor of LBP across the BMI spectrum (odds ratio 1.6-2.9). Physical activity also modulates these risks. In the overall model, the best physical activity predictors of LBP are in the moderate and high intensity ranges with small effects (odds ratio 0.98 and 0.996 per standard deviation increase, respectively). When broken down by BMI, time spent in sedentary and moderate activity ranges demonstrate more robust influences on LBP status in the overweight, obese, and ultraobese groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increased BMI is a risk factor for back pain in Americans. More important, the role of physical activity in mitigating back pain risk is shown to be of greater consequence in the overweight and obese populations.

The spinal stenosis pedometer and nutrition lifestyle intervention (SSPANLI) randomized controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Because of symptoms, people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are often inactive, and this sedentary behaviour implies risk for diseases including obesity. Research has identified body mass index as the most powerful predictor of function in LSS. This suggests that function may be improved by targeting weight as a modifiable factor. An e-health lifestyle intervention was developed aimed at reducing fat mass and increasing physical activity in people with LSS. The main components of this intervention include pedometer-based physical activity promotion and nutrition education. METHODS/DESIGN: The Spinal Stenosis Pedometer and Nutrition Lifestyle INTERVENTION (SSPANLI) was developed and piloted with 10 individuals. The protocol for a randomized controlled trail comparing the SSPANLI intervention to usual non-surgical care follows. One hundred six (106) overweight or obese individuals with LSS will be recruited. Baseline and follow-up testing includes dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, blood draw, 3-day food record, 7-day accelerometry, questionnaire, maximal oxygen consumption, neurological exam, balance testing and a Self-Paced Walking Test. INTERVENTION: During Week 1, the intervention group will receive a pedometer, and a personalized consultation with both a Dietitian and an exercise specialist. For 12 weeks participants will log on to the e-health website to access personal step goals, walking maps, nutrition videos, and motivational quotes. Participants will also have access to in-person Coffee Talk meetings every 3 weeks, and meet with the Dietitian and exercise specialist at week 6. The control group will proceed with usual care for the 12-week period. Follow-up testing will occur at Weeks 13 and 24. DISCUSSION: This lifestyle intervention has the potential to provide a unique, non-surgical management option for people with LSS. Through decreased fat mass and increased function, we may reduce risk for obesity, chronic diseases of inactivity, and pain. The use of e-health interventions provides an opportunity for patients to become more involved in managing their own health. Behaviour changes including increased physical activity, and improved dietary habits promote overall health and quality of life, and may decrease future health care needs in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01902979.

Predictors of objectively measured walking capacity in people with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Identifying factors associated with walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) may provide a better understanding of neurogenic claudication and inform future rehabilitation research. OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with objectively measured walking capacity in a sample of people with LSS and self-reported walking limitations. METHODS: Participants included 49 individuals (65.8 years ± 10) who were at least 45 years of age with clinically diagnosed lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) confirmed on MRI or CT imaging. All participants completed a Self-Paced Walking Test with visual analog pain scales and body diagrams before and immediately after walking. Questionnaires included the Physical Function and Symptom Severity Scales of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Health Utilities Index. Univariate linear relationships were examined, followed by development of a multivariate linear regression model with walking distance (m) as the dependent variable. A post-hoc analysis was also conducted including post-test symptom variables. RESULTS: Variables retained from univariate analyses included years of leg pain, pre-test leg pain severity, the ODI, balance problems, and quality of life. When these variables were considered for a final model, only the ODI and balance problems were retained (R2=0.33). Other than balance, none of the pre-test symptom variables entered into the final model. Post-hoc analysis including post-test symptom variables found the presence and severity of post-test leg pain to be most highly associated with walking distance. In an explanatory model considering the ODI, balance and these two post-walking factors, only presence of post-test leg pain added to the model (R2=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Factors found to be most highly associated with walking capacity in LSS were self-reported, pain-related function (ODI), balance problems, and presence of leg pain immediately following walking.

Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of magnetic resonance images. OBJECTIVE: Examine the diagnostic accuracy, discriminative ability, and reliability of the sedimentation sign in a sample of patients with clinically diagnosed lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), low back pain (LBP), and vascular claudication, and in asymptomatic controls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) was recently described as a new diagnostic test for LSS; however, the degree to which this sign is sensitive and specific in diagnosis of LSS is unknown. METHODS: All LSS images were obtained from subjects who had clinically diagnosed LSS confirmed on imaging by a spine specialist. The other images were obtained from people with LBP but no LSS, people with severe vascular claudication, and asymptomatic participants. Three blinded raters independently assessed the images. A positive sign was defined as the absence of nerve root sedimentation at the level above or below the level of maximum stenosis. RESULTS: Images from 148 subjects were reviewed (67 LSS, 31 LBP, 4 vascular, and 46 asymptomatic). Intrarater reliability for the sign ranged from κ= 0.87 to 0.97 and inter-rater reliability from 0.62 to 0.69. Sensitivity ranged from 42% to 66%, and specificity ranged from 49% to 78%. Sensitivity improved to a range of 60% to 96% when images with only a smallest cross-sectional area of the dural sac less than 80 mm were included. The sign was able to differentiate (P = 0.004) between LSS and asymptomatic controls but not between LSS and LBP or between LSS and vascular claudication. CONCLUSION: The SedSign was shown to have high intrarater reliability and acceptable inter-rater reliability. The Sign appears most sensitive in defining severe LSS cases, yet may not aid in the differential diagnosis of LSS from LBP or vascular claudication, or add any specific diagnostic information beyond the traditional history, physical examination, and imaging studies that are standard in LSS diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

A review of activity monitors as a new technology for objectifying function in lumbar spinal stenosis.

The purpose of this review article is to introduce the concept of activity monitoring, and to discuss the application of accelerometry in rehabilitation research and clinical practice using lumbar spinal stenosis as a model. Function is a complex concept, and changes in function have historically been challenging to measure. The International Classification of Functioning (ICF) defines two distinct components of function: capacity and performance. Capacity, the ability to perform a given task in a controlled environment can be measured through any number of existing functional measures. Performance, defined as activities performed on a day to day basis in the context of real life is challenging to measure, yet important in identifying the impact of pathology on real life. Recent advances in technology have allowed us to begin to measure performance, using activity monitors (accelerometers). Activity monitoring has the potential to change our concepts of outcomes, and as a result, expand our ideas about appropriateness of interventions in rehabilitation. Researchers and clinicians might benefit from using the new technology of activity monitors to measure the impact of intervention and to assess function. Therefore, this review will discuss the concept of activity monitoring and highlight potential uses for activity monitors in spine research and clinical care.

Changes in objectively measured physical activity (performance) after epidural steroid injection for lumbar spinal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in objectively measured physical activity (performance) at 1 week following epidural steroid injection for lumbar spinal stenosis. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: University spine program. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=17) who were undergoing fluoroscopically guided epidural steroid injection for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (mean age ± SD, 70.1±6.7; 47% women). INTERVENTION: Fluoroscopically guided epidural injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The 2 primary outcomes, measured with accelerometers, were total activity (performance) measured over 7 days and maximum continuous activity (capacity). Walking capacity was also assessed with the Self-Paced Walking Test, and subjects completed the Oswestry Disability Index, Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, visual analog pain scales, and body diagrams. RESULTS: At 1 week postinjection, 58.8% of the subjects demonstrated increased total activity and 53% had increased maximum continuous activity, although neither change was statistically significant. Significant improvements were observed in a number of the self-report instruments, including the Physical Function Scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, general health (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey), role-limitation emotional (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey), leg pain intensity (visual analog pain scales), and presence of leg weakness. CONCLUSIONS: While patients perceived improvements in pain and function following injection, these improvements were not reflected in significant changes in performance or capacity. Future studies will continue to find value in subjective measures of pain and quality of life. However, with modern technology, performance is no longer a subjective variable. Use of activity monitors to objectively measure performance can result in more rigorous validation of treatment effects, while simultaneously highlighting the potential need for additional postinjection rehabilitation aimed at improving performance.

Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls.

OBJECTIVE: To examine predictors of community walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), compared with people with low back pain and asymptomatic control subjects. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University spine program. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=126; 50 LSS, 44 low back pain, 32 asymptomatic control subjects) aged 55 to 80 years were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Seven-day community walking distance measured by pedometer (walking performance) and a 15-minute walking test (walking capacity). All participants had lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging, electrodiagnostic testing, and a history and physical examination, including a history of pain and neurologic symptoms, a straight leg raise test, and tests for directional symptoms, reflexes, strength, and nerve tension signs. The study questionnaire included demographic information, a history of back/leg pain, and questions about walking, exercise frequency, and pain level, as well as the standardized Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. RESULTS: Body mass index (BMI), pain, age, and female sex predicted walking performance (r(2)=.41) and walking capacity (r(2)=.41). The diagnosis of LSS itself had no clear relationship with either walking variable. Compared with the asymptomatic group, LSS participants had significantly lower values for all walking parameters, with the exception of stride length, while there was no significant difference between the LSS and low back pain groups. CONCLUSIONS: BMI, pain, female sex, and age predict walking performance and capacity in people with LSS, those with low back pain, and asymptomatic control subjects. While pain was the strongest predictor of walking capacity, BMI was the strongest predictor of walking performance. Average pain, rather than leg pain, was predictive of walking performance and capacity. Obesity and pain are modifiable predictors of walking deficits that could be targets for future intervention studies aimed at increasing walking performance and capacity in both the low back pain and LSS populations.

Validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Measurement (validity) study. OBJECTIVE: Examine validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity for use in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment outcomes in patients with LSS are often determined using data from self-report questionnaires. Despite some validity evidence available to support the use of self-report instruments in the evaluation of walking capacity in LSS, it is not certain that the construct being tapped using any of the self-report measures is, in fact, walking capacity. METHODS: Validity of the Physical Function Scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), self-predicted walking capacity (distance in meters) and a number of single item walking capacity questions was evaluated through comparison with a criterion measure of walking capacity, the Self-Paced Walking Test, in patients with LSS. Test-retest reproducibility was also examined for each of the self-report measures. RESULTS: Subjects included 49 patients (65.8 ± 10.0 years of age) with LSS confirmed on imaging and by a spine specialist surgeon. The measures found to be most highly associated with the criterion Self-Paced Walking Test were the walking distance item from the ODI (r = 0.83) and self-reported walking capacity in meters (with the aid of a distance reference) (r = 0.80). Reported walking capacity in meters had the lowest test-retest reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.65) of the measures studied. CONCLUSION: This study provides new information to help guide health professionals and researchers in the selection of appropriate outcome tools when examining walking in an LSS population. Study results support the use of the Physical Function Scale, self-reported walking distance, and the walking specific items from the ODI and the Physical Function Scale.