The visual field in toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis.

AIMS: To document loss of central field in patients with scars from toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis close to the disc after resolution of disease. METHODS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis were enrolled from four centres. Automated central visual field testing was performed when their disease had settled and retinal photographs of the lesions were taken. The type of central field defect (whether absolute or relative) and whether it broke out to the periphery were correlated with the size of the retinochoroidal scar and its proximity to the optic nerve head. RESULTS: 69 eyes were enrolled; 16 (26%) were discarded because of poor field performance. Of the 53 remaining eyes, 31 showed absolute defects and 20 relative defects. Scars within one disc diameter of the disc were more likely to be associated with absolute defects breaking out to the periphery. CONCLUSION: The scarring induced by toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis is associated with considerable field loss when it occurs close to the optic nerve head. Current treatment is unlikely to ameliorate this situation. The degree of visual field loss should be an outcome measure for future trials of the efficacy of treatment trials for the disease.

The pupil in dominant optic atrophy.

PURPOSE: To compare visual and pupil afferent function in dominant optic atrophy (DOA). METHODS: Patients with DOA who belonged to families showing evidence of linkage to the locus on chromosome 3q28-qter were recruited from the Moorfields Genetic Register. Patients and healthy control subjects underwent visual and pupil perimetry using a modified automated perimeter (Octopus 1-2-3; Interzeag, Schlieren, Switzerland). Five stimulus locations were tested: fixation, and at 17 degrees eccentricity along the 45 degrees and 135 degrees meridians in all four quadrants. The visual deficit (difference in decibels between the patient's luminance threshold and that in age-matched healthy control subjects) was compared directly with the pupil deficit (difference in decibels between the stimulus intensity giving the patient's pupil response and that giving an equivalent pupil response in healthy control subjects) at each test location. RESULTS: Visual deficits and pupil afferent deficits were found at all five locations. The visual deficits were significantly greater than the pupil deficits at the four peripheral locations (median difference = 6.3 dB, P: < 0.001). At fixation, the difference was not significant (median difference = 2.3 dB, P: = 0.407). CONCLUSIONS: Pupil function appears less affected than visual function at four of five locations tested. This result provides evidence that the retinotectal fibers serving the pupil light reflex are less susceptible to damage from the OPA1 genetic defect than the retinogeniculate fibers serving vision.