Factors Associated With the Mental Health and Satisfaction of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study and Analysis.

PURPOSE: Residents in training have reported high levels of stress and anxiety and have a greater risk of mental health problems compared with the general population. Mental health problems among residents have been correlated with decreased professional effectiveness, increased medical errors, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization and could have significant negative effects on future practitioners. The purpose of the present study was to identify the factors that might be associated with the mental health and satisfaction of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) residents and to determine the associations between these factors and OMS resident satisfaction as a surrogate of resident well-being. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed and implemented an online survey, which was e-mailed to all OMS residents in the 101 accredited training programs in the United States. The survey was designed to determine and assess the factors associated with OMS resident satisfaction. Differences between groups were tested using 1-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables. For each factor, we fit a logistic regression model to estimate the odds ratio of resident satisfaction for the factor, adjusting for gender, year in residency, and years of advanced training. RESULTS: Of the 1181 resident surveys sent out, 300 were completed (25.4% response rate). The satisfied OMS residents tended to be men, further along in their training program, and to have access to mental health resources. Dissatisfaction was associated with greater self-reported stress levels, working a greater number of hours per week, and believing one would be viewed differently for speaking to faculty about mental health. CONCLUSIONS: OMS resident satisfaction was associated with identifiable and potentially modifiable factors. These factors included workload characteristics, stress and coping ability, and mental health impact and resource availability. Evidence-based strategies for OMS resident well-being could lead to the development of best practice guidelines for promoting and optimizing resident mental health.

Investigation of an Opioid Prescribing Protocol After Third Molar Extraction Procedures.

PURPOSE: The United States is experiencing an epidemic of opioid overdoses and deaths. The relation between prescription opioids and opioid abuse is well documented. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons and other dentists are proportionately among the most prevalent prescribers of opioids. Practitioners are looking for evidence-based ways to decrease excess opioid prescriptions and adequately manage postoperative pain. The authors recently analyzed the impact of a mandated nonopioid prescribing protocol at their institution. Although broad guidelines have been useful for treating postoperative pain, there are no procedure-specific guidelines for managing pain after third molar extraction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an opioid prescribing protocol was sufficient to decrease opioid prescribing after third molar extractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study compared the use of opioids prescribed for patients undergoing third molar extraction before introducing and after implementing a postoperative opioid prescribing protocol. The inclusion criterion was third molar extraction performed at the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN) during the fourth quarters of 2015 and 2017 with complete records. RESULTS: The number of opioid prescriptions decreased and the number of nonopioid analgesics prescribed increased for all procedure codes after implementation of the protocol. Higher Current Dental Terminology (CDT) codes were associated with increased opioid prescriptions, indicating increased surgical difficulty was a rationale for opioid prescriptions. The mean number of opioid tablets per prescription was 15.9 in 2015 and decreased to 11.5 in 2017. No statistical difference was observed for average tablets for various CDT codes. CONCLUSION: Data from this study suggest an acute postoperative pain opioid prescribing protocol leads to fewer opioid prescriptions after third molar extraction procedures, less variance in opioid prescribing among practitioners, a decreased number of opioid tablets prescribed per patient, and safe and effective management of acute postoperative pain.