A Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab versus Placebo for Previously Treated Patients from Asia with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Health-Related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-394.

Introduction: KEYNOTE-394 showed pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate with manageable safety versus placebo for patients from Asia with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We present results on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: HRQoL was evaluated using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires. Key HRQoL endpoints were least squares mean (LSM) score changes from baseline to week 12 and time to deterioration (TTD) for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL. p values were one-sided and nominal without adjustment for multiplicity. Results: The HRQoL population included patients randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n = 298) and placebo (n = 152). From baseline to week 12, a greater decline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was observed with placebo (LSM, -8.4; 95% CI: -11.7 to -5.1) versus pembrolizumab (-4.0; 95% CI: -6.4 to -1.6; difference vs. placebo: 4.4; 95% CI: 0.5-8.4; nominal p = 0.0142). Similarly, a greater decline in the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale score was observed with placebo (-6.9; 95% CI: -9.4 to -4.5) versus pembrolizumab (-2.7; 95% CI: -4.5 to -1.0; difference vs. placebo: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.2-7.2; nominal p = 0.0030). TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.58-1.25; nominal p = 0.1993). Conclusion: Patients receiving placebo showed a greater decline in HRQoL than those receiving pembrolizumab. Combined with efficacy and safety data from KEYNOTE-394 and the global KEYNOTE-240 and KEYNOTE-224 trials, our data support the clinically meaningful benefit and manageable tolerability of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Efficacy and safety of zimberelimab (GLS-010) monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: There is an unmet need to improve clinical outcomes for patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Checkpoint inhibitors represent a promising treatment strategy. We evaluated the safety and anti-tumor activity of zimberelimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody, in patients with previously treated, recurrent, metastatic cervical cancer. METHODS: This phase II, single-arm, open-label study used a Simon two-stage minimax design. Eligible patients were women aged 18-75 years with programmed death ligand-1-positive recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer that had progressed after first- or subsequent-line chemotherapy (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1). Patients received intravenous zimberelimab (240 mg every 2 weeks) for 2 years until disease progression, intolerable adverse effects, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint was objective response rate assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, by an independent review committee. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were enrolled. Median age was 51 (range, 31-75) years; 63.8% had an ECOG performance status of 1. The median number of previous treatment lines was 1 (range, 1-4). Median follow-up was 16.9 (range, 16.3-18.4) months. The objective response rate was 27.6%, and the disease control rate was 55.2%. Median duration of response was not reached. Median overall survival was 16.8 months, and median progression-free survival was 3.7 months. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of any grade was 78.1%, of which the most common were hypothyroidism (26.7%) and anemia (19.0%). CONCLUSION: Zimberelimab monotherapy demonstrated durable anti-tumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with cervical cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03972722.

An Up-To-Date Investigation Into the Correlation Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the current anticancer therapies, a considerable proportion of patients are found to hardly benefit from these drugs. Accumulating studies have demonstrated that concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use may affect the clinical efficacy of ICIs; however, their results are inconsistent. In this study, based on updated evidence, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to clarify the prognostic significance of PPI use in advanced solid cancer patients receiving ICI therapy. Methods: Eligible literature was searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and other network resources before July 2021. Clinical outcome was evaluated using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The correlation of PPI use with OS or PFS was determined based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 17 studies enrolling 9,978 ICI-treated cancer patients were included in our meta-analysis. The global analysis demonstrated that PPI use was significantly correlated with worse OS [HR = 1.29 (1.10-1.50)] instead of PFS [HR = 1.19 (0.98-1.44)] in solid cancer patients receiving ICI therapy. In a subgroup analysis, the negative correlation of PPI use with ICI efficacy was significant in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [PFS, HR = 1.27 (1.10-1.47)] and urothelial carcinoma [OS, HR = 1.55 (1.31-1.84), PFS, HR = 1.52 (1.13-2.06)] and mixed cohorts containing multiple cancer types [OS, HR = 1.40 (1.16-1.69)], while an opposite result was observed in the PFS of patients with melanoma [HR = 0.48 (0.25-0.90)]. Moreover, the unfavorable prognostic impact of PPI use was also significant in patients over 65 years old [OS, HR = 1.28 (1.05-1.55), PFS, HR = 1.32 (1.12-1.56)] or those receiving anti-PD-1 [OS, HR = 1.37 (1.04-1.79)] or anti-PD-L1 therapies (OS, HR = 1.49 (1.30-1.69), PFS, HR = 1.34 (1.20-1.50). Finally, PPI use was significantly correlated with a worse prognosis in patients receiving PPIs 30 days before and/or after ICI initiation (OS, HR = 1.38 (1.18-1.62), PFS, HR = 1.23 (1.06-1.43)). Conclusion: Although our global analysis revealed PPI use was not correlated with the PFS of ICI-treated patients, considering the results of our subgroup analysis, PPIs should be still cautiously used shortly before or during ICI therapy. Furthermore, more clinical validations and related mechanism investigations are of great necessity to clarify the clinical correlation of PPI use with ICI efficacy. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], PROSPERO [No. CRD42021243707].

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Between Lower and Higher Radiation Doses for Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) plus surgery has been a standard treatment for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer and carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (EC/GEJ), but the optimal preoperative radiation dose is still unclear. We performed this systematic review to explore the treatment efficacy and toxicity of different radiation dose levels and find an optimal dose-fractionation strategy in EC/GEJ patients receiving nCRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Embase and Ovid Medline were searched for articles involving cases of operable squamous and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ in which patients received nCRT up to a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions that were published until July 2019, when the search was performed. Physical dose distributions were converted to biologically equivalent doses (BEDs), which were described in units of gray (alpha/beta). Pooled rates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), failure patterns, and toxicities were compared between lower-dose radiation therapy (LDRT; BED ≤48.85 Gy10) and higher-dose radiation therapy (HDRT; BED >48.85 Gy10) for patients treated with nCRT. RESULTS: A total of 110 studies with 7577 EC/GEJ patients receiving nCRT were included in this pooled analysis. Both the PFS and OS rates of patients receiving LDRT were significantly higher than those of patients receiving HDRT. Patients receiving LDRT had improved safety regarding treatment-related adverse events and lower distant failure rates than patients receiving HDRT. Utilization of modern radiation therapy (RT) techniques, including 3-dimensional conformal RT and intensity modulated RT, was associated with improved oncologic outcomes compared with 2-dimensional methods. Subgroup analysis showed that EC/GEJ patients receiving conventionally fractionated radiation to a dose of 40.0 to 41.4 Gy in 20-23 fractions showed improved OS compared with those receiving radiation above this dose. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited data, nCRT using BED ≤48.85 Gy10 was suitable for locoregionally advanced, resectable EC/GEJ. A total dose of 40.0 to 41.4 Gy in 20 to 23 fractions using modern RT techniques might provide the optimal therapeutic ratio.

Antibiotic administration shortly before or after immunotherapy initiation is correlated with poor prognosis in solid cancer patients: An up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently achieved inspiring performance in improving the prognosis of various solid tumors. Gut microbiome plays a crucial modulatory role in the efficacy of ICIs, which can be influenced by antibiotic (ATB) administration. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to clarify the correlations of ATB administration with the prognosis of solid cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. METHOD: The eligible literatures were searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical trials.gov databases before 29 February 2020. The correlations of ATB administration with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using Hazard ratios (HRs) coupled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 33 studies enrolling 5565 solid cancer patients receiving ICI treatment were included in this meta-analysis. As a whole, ATB administration was significantly correlated worse OS (HR = 1.76, 95%CI = 1.41-2.19, P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 1.76, 95%CI = 1.47-2.12, P < 0.00001). This significant association was then observed in the subgroup analysis based on region (except for OS in Europe), sample size, age, therapeutic strategy and ICI type. The similar results were also found in subgroup analysis for lung, renal cell (except for OS) and other cancers (such as melanoma) but not for mixed cancers. In addition, the ICI efficacy was more likely to be diminished by ATB administration within a time frame from 60 days before to 60 days after ICI initiation. CONCLUSION: ATBs should be used cautiously in solid cancer patients receiving ICIs. However, further validations are still essential due to existing publication bias.

Downregulation of FBP1 Promotes Tumor Metastasis and Indicates Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer via Regulating Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies indicated that some glycolytic enzymes are complicated, multifaceted proteins rather than simple components of the glycolytic pathway. FBP1 plays a vital role in glucose metabolism, but its role in gastric cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis has not been fully understood. METHODS: The prognostic value of FBP1 was first studied in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and validated in in-house database. The effect of FBP1 on cell proliferation and metastasis was examined in vitro. Nonparametric test and Log-rank test were used to evaluate the clinical significance of FBP1 expression. RESULTS: In the TCGA cohort, FBP1 mRNA level were shown to be predictive of overall survival in gastric cancer (P = 0.029). In the validation cohort, FBP1 expression were inversely correlated with advanced N stage (P = 0.021) and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.011). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that FBP1 was an independent predictor for both overall survival (P = 0.004) and disease free survival (P<0.001). Functional studies demonstrated that ectopic FBP1 expression inhibited proliferation and invasion in gastric cancer cells, while silencing FBP1 expression had opposite effects (P<0.05). Mechanically, FBP1 serves as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). CONCLUSIONS: Downregulation of FBP1 promotes gastric cancer metastasis by facilitating EMT and acts as a potential prognostic factor and therapeutic target in gastric cancer.

Disadvantage of survival outcomes in widowed patients with colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results database.

Marital status correlates with health. Our goal was to examine the impact of marital status on the survival outcomes of patients with colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program was used to identify 1,289 eligible patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2010 with colorectal NENs. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression proportional hazards methods. Patients in the widowed group had the highest proportion of larger tumor (>2cm), and higher ratio of poor grade (Grade III and IV) and more tumors at advanced stage (P<0.05). The 5-year cause specific survival (CSS) was 76% in the married group, 51% in the widowed group, 73% in the single group, and 72% in the divorced/separated group, which manifest statistically significant difference in the univariate log-rank test and Cox regression model (P<0.05). Furthermore, marital status was an independent prognostic factor only in Distant stage (P<0.001). In conclusion, patients in widowed group were at greater risk of cancer specific mortality from colorectal NENs and social support may lead to improved outcomes for patients with NENs.

FOXO4 and FOXD3 are predictive of prognosis in gastric carcinoma patients.

Forkhead box (FOX) transcription factor family plays an important role in cancer growth and metastasis. This study aimed to determine the predictive ability of FOX genes in gastric carcinoma. A total of 360 patients with gastric from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohorts were collected in this study. The expression profile of FOX family were obtained from the TCGA RNAseq database. Clinicopathological characteristics, including age, gender, tumor node metastasis (TNM), tumor grade, and overall survival were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess the risk factors for survival, and the results were further validated in in-house cohort. In the TCGA cohort, FOXO4 (HR = 0.613, 95%CI 0.452-0.832) and FOXD3 (HR = 1.704, 95%CI 1.212-2.397) were shown independently predictive of overall survival in gastric cancer after Cox proportional hazards analysis. The finding was validated in our in-house cohort, which demonstrated that both FOXO4 and FOXD3 were independent predictors for overall survival (FOXO4 high, HR: 0.445, 95%CI 0.277-0.715, P = 0.001, FOXD3 high, HR: 1.927, 95%CI 1.212-3.063, P = 0.006) and disease free survival (FOXO4 high, HR: 0.628, 95%CI 0.420-0.935, P = 0.022, FOXD3 high, HR: 1.698, 95%CI 1.136-2.540, P = 0.010).Collectively, FOX family paly critical roles in gastric cancer, and FOXO4 and FOXD3 were identified as independent prognostic factors for survival outcomes of gastric cancer. Further functional study is needed to understand more about FOX family in gastric cancer.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Apatinib in Patients With Chemotherapy-Refractory Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction.

PURPOSE: There is currently no standard treatment strategy for patients with advanced metastatic gastric cancer experiencing progression after two or more lines of chemotherapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of apatinib, a novel vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma for whom at least two lines of prior chemotherapy had failed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Patients from 32 centers in China with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, for whom two or more prior lines of chemotherapy had failed, were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to oral apatinib 850 mg or placebo once daily. The primary end points were overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between January 2011 and November 2012, 267 patients were enrolled. Median OS was significantly improved in the apatinib group compared with the placebo group (6.5 months; 95% CI, 4.8 to 7.6 v 4.7 months; 95% CI, 3.6 to 5.4; P = .0149; hazard ratio, 0.709; 95% CI, 0.537 to 0.937; P = .0156). Similarly, apatinib significantly prolonged median PFS compared with placebo (2.6 months; 95% CI, 2.0 to 2.9 v 1.8 months; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.9; P < .001; hazard ratio, 0.444; 95% CI, 0.331 to 0.595; P < .001). The most common grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and hypertension. CONCLUSION: These data show that apatinib treatment significantly improved OS and PFS with an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to two or more lines of prior chemotherapy.

The prognostic significance of age in operated and non-operated colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of age in colorectal cancer remains controversial. Our purpose was to determine the impact of age at diagnosis on cause- specific survival and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based data, we identified 226,430 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2005. Patients were separated into 10-year age groups. Five-year cancer cause-specific survival and overall survival data were obtained. Kaplan-Meier methods were adopted and multivariable Cox regression models were built for the analysis of long-term survival outcomes and risk factors. RESULTS: In the operated group, those aged 51-60 had the best prognosis with 5-year cause-specific survival of 72.3% and 5-year overall survival of 68.3%.In the non-operated group, those of young age 15-30 had the best prognosis with 5-year cause-specific survival of 21.2% and 5-year overall survival of 18.2%, and there was continued worsening in cause-specific survival and overall survival with increasing age, except for a small increase in the 51-60 age group (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a statistically significant disadvantage in cause-specific survival in patients older than 60 (P < 0.001), but the difference between the 51-60 age group and the younger age group (15-30, 31-40, 41-50) wasn't statistically significant (P > 0.05) in both operated and non-operated patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was no apparent difference in survival in colorectal cancer patients 60 and younger, but in those older than 60 years, there was worsening in overall survival and cause-specific survival in both operated and non-operated patients.

Integrated analysis of DNA methylation and mRNA expression profiling reveals candidate genes associated with cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.

DNA methylation plays a critical role during the development of acquired chemoresistance. The aim of this study was to identify candidate DNA methylation drivers of cisplatin (DDP) resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The A549/DDP cell line was established by continuous exposure of A549 cells to increasing concentrations of DDP. Gene expression and methylation profiling were determined by high-throughput microarrays. Relationship of methylation status and DDP response was validated in primary tumor cell culture and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) samples. Cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, and response to DDP were determined in vitro and in vivo. A total of 372 genes showed hypermethylation and downregulation in A549/DDP cells, and these genes were involved in most fundamental biological processes. Ten candidate genes (S100P, GDA, WISP2, LOXL1, TIMP4, ICAM1, CLMP, HSP8, GAS1, BMP2) were selected, and exhibited varying degrees of association with DDP resistance. Low dose combination of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-dC) and trichostatin A (TSA) reversed drug resistance of A549/DDP cells in vitro and in vivo, along with demethylation and restoration of expression of candidate genes (GAS1, TIMP4, ICAM1 and WISP2). Forced expression of GAS1 in A549/DDP cells by gene transfection contributed to increased sensitivity to DDP, proliferation inhibition, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis enhancement, and in vivo growth retardation. Together, our study demonstrated that a panel of candidate genes downregulated by DNA methylation induced DDP resistance in NSCLC, and showed that epigenetic therapy resensitized cells to DDP.

CDH13 and FLBN3 gene methylation are associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to identify potential epigenetic prognostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Chinese population. The methylation status of five tumor suppressor genes (CDH13, DLEC1, FBLN3, hMHL1 and RUNX3) was determined using manual microdissection followed by methylation-specific PCR in 85 paired CRC specimens and adjacent normal tissue. The results showed that methylation frequencies in cancerous tissues were 31.8% for CDH13, 37.6% for DLEC1, 38.8% for FBLN3, 22.4% for hMHL1 and 27.1% for RUNX3, all of which were significantly higher than in corresponding normal tissue. Furthermore, CDH13 methylation was associated with poor differentiation (P = 0.019) and tended to be predominant in advanced stages (P = 0.084); FBLN3 methylation was associated with advanced stages (P = 0.027) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.029). Accordingly, the methylation status of CDH13 (P = 0.022), FBLN3 (P = 0.008), CDH13 and/or FBLN3 (P = 0.001) predicted adverse overall survival in CRC, while hMHL1 methylation showed a protective role in survival (P = 0.046). Cox proportional hazard models further indicated that CDH13 and/or FBLN3 methylation, but not that of hMHL1, was an independent prognostic factor for CRC. In conclusion, we found CDH13 and FBLN3 gene methylation are potential biomarkers for poor prognosis in CRC.

PGE2 up-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression in MKN28 gastric cancer cells via epidermal growth factor receptor signaling system.

AIM: 1) To evaluate the effect of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on the regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in gastric MKN28 cells, and 2) to investigate the role of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signal transduction pathway in any effect exerted by PGE2 on VEGF expression. METHODS: MKN28 cells were incubated with the vehicle (control) or with PGE2 in the presence or absence of AG1478, a selective inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine kinase, or PD098059, a selective inhibitor of the kinase responsible for ERK2 phosphorylation (mitogen-activated protein (MAP)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis were used to evaluate VEGF mRNA and protein expression. The activity of EGFR and ERK2 was measured by Western blot analysis. RESULTS: PGE2 significantly up-regulated VEGF mRNA and protein expression and increased the activation of EGFR and ERK2. Incubation of MKN28 cells with AG1478 significantly reduced PGE2-induced EGFR activity, ERK2 activity, and VEGF mRNA and protein expression. Meanwhile, incubation of MKN28 with PD098059 reduced PGE2-induced ERK2 activity and VEGF mRNA and protein expression, but had no effect on EGFR activity. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that PGE2 up-regulates VEGF expression in gastric cancer cells via transactivation of EGFR-MAPK signaling pathways, which may be mechanisms underlying the contribution of COX-2 to tumor angiogenesis in gastric cancer.