The prerequisites and clinical outcomes of ipsilateral C7 nerve root transfer to the upper trunk for adult C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries.

PURPOSE: Although ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer is used for the treatment of C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries, accurately evaluating the functional quality of the donor nerve (ipsilateral C7 nerve root) is difficult, especially when the C7 nerve root is slightly injured. The purpose of this study was to determine the indicators to evaluate the quality of the ipsilateral C7 nerve and assess the clinical outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: This study employed the following three indicators to assess the quality of the ipsilateral C7 nerve: (1) the muscle strength and electrophysiological status of the latissimus dorsi, triceps brachii, and extensor digitorum communis; (2) the sensibility of the radial three digits, especially the index finger; and (3) the intraoperative appearance, feel and electrophysiological status of the ipsilateral C7 nerve root. Transfer of the ipsilateral C7 nerve root to the upper trunk was implemented only when the following three tests were conducted, the criteria were met, and the clinical outcomes were assessed in eight patients with C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for an average of 90 ± 42 months. At the final follow-up, all eight patients achieved recovery of elbow flexion, with five and three patients scoring M4 and M3, respectively, according to the Medical Research Council scoring. The shoulder abduction range of motor recovery averaged 86 ± 47° (range, 30°-170°), whereas the shoulder external rotation averaged 51 ± 26° (range, 15°-90°). CONCLUSION: Ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer is a reliable and effective option for the functional reconstruction of the shoulder and elbow after C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries when the three prerequisites are met.

Combined Nerve and Tendon Transfers for C7-T1 Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injury.

BACKGROUND: In patients with C7-T1 brachial plexus avulsions, complete loss of hand function is commonly seen. However, the reconstruction of hand function is difficult. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of hand function recovery after combined nerve and tendon transfers in C7-T1 brachial plexus injury. METHODS: From 2012 to 2019, 8 patients with C7-T1 brachial plexus injury underwent combined nerve and tendon transfers for hand function restoration, which included the following: (1) the pronator teres motor branch to the anterior interosseous nerve and brachialis motor branch to the flexor digitorum superficialis branch for finger flexion, (2) the supinator motor branch to the posterior interosseous nerve for finger extension, (3) the brachioradialis tendon transfer for thumb opposition, and (4) the radial branch of the superficial radial nerve to the sensory branch of the ulnar nerve for sensory reconstruction. Patients were evaluated for functional improvement of finger flexion, finger extension, thumb opposition, and sensory recovery. RESULTS: No clinical donor deficits were observed. Seven of eight patients recovered finger and thumb flexion (4 patients scored British Medical Research Council grade M4 and 3 scored M3). The average grip strength was 3.4 kg. All patients regained finger extension (4 scored M4 and 4 scored M3), thumb opposition, and protective sensation on the ulnar hand. Patients were able to use their reconstructed hands in daily lives. CONCLUSION: Combined nerve and tendon transfers are reliable and effective. This strategy could be an option for hand function reconstruction after C7-T1 brachial plexus injury.