Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Chest ; 2024 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458431

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the evidence of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) in emergency medicine. By emphasizing clinical topics, time trends, study designs, and the scope of the primary outcomes, a map is provided for physicians and researchers to guide their future initiatives. RESEARCH QUESTION: Which study designs and primary outcomes are reported in published studies of LUS in emergency medicine? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for LUS studies published prior to May 13, 2023. Study characteristics were synthesized quantitatively. The primary outcomes in all papers were categorized into the hierarchical Fryback and Thornbury levels. RESULTS: A total of 4,076 papers were screened and, following selection and handsearching, 406 papers were included. The number of publications doubled from January 2020 to May 2023 (204 to 406 papers). The study designs were primarily observational (n = 375 [92%]), followed by randomized (n = 18 [4%]) and case series (n = 13 [3%]). The primary outcome measure concerned diagnostic accuracy in 319 papers (79%), diagnostic thinking in 32 (8%), therapeutic changes in 4 (1%), and patient outcomes in 14 (3%). No increase in the proportions of randomized controlled trials or the scope of primary outcome measures was observed with time. A freely available interactive database was created to enable readers to search for any given interest (https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/blinded/viz/LUSinEM_240216/INFO). INTERPRETATION: Observational diagnostic studies have been produced in abundance, leaving a paucity of research exploring clinical utility. Notably, research exploring whether LUS causes changes to clinical decisions is imperative prior to any further research being made into patient benefits.

2.
J Intensive Care Soc ; 24(2): 154-161, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37260427

RESUMO

Introduction: The age of patients admitted into critical care in the UK is increasing. Clinical decisions for very-old patients, usually defined as over 80, can be challenging. Clinicians are frequently asked to predict outcomes as part of discussions around the pros and cons of an intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Measures of overall health in old age, such as the clinical frailty scale (CFS), are increasingly used to help guide these discussions. We aimed to understand the characteristics of the very-old critically unwell population in the UK and the associations between frailty and outcome of an ICU admission in our healthcare system (National Health Service, NHS). Methods: Baseline characteristics, ICU interventions and outcomes (ICU- and 30-day mortality) were recorded for sequential admissions of very old patients to UK ICUs as part of the European VIP 1 and 2 studies. Patient characteristics, interventions and outcome measures were compared by frailty group using standard statistical tests. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was undertaken to test association between baseline characteristics, admission type and outcome. Results: 1858 participants were enrolled from 95 ICUs in the UK. The median age was 83. The median CFS was 4 (IQR 3-5). 30-day survival was significantly lower in the frail group (CFS > 4, 58%) compared to vulnerable (CFS = 4, 65%) and fit (CFS < 4 68%, p = .004). Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, reason for admission and CFS were all independently associated with increased 30-day mortality (p < .01). Conclusion: In the UK, frailty is associated with an increase in mortality at 30-days following an ICU admission. At moderate frailty (CFS 5-6), three out of every five patients admitted survived to 30-days. This is a similar mortality to septic shock.

3.
Pediatr Radiol ; 51(1): 86-93, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32940727

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants may be more vulnerable to fractures due to various factors, including metabolic bone disease, but an increased risk of fractures up to the age of 2 is unproven. OBJECTIVE: To compare fracture patterns in premature and full-term children in the first 3 years of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted. We excluded any child who returned with the same injury, with known metabolic bone disease, with any disease or condition known to reduce bone density, who received any medication known to affect Vitamin D metabolism within 3 months of enrollment or who had fractures post-surgery/resuscitation. Variables such as the number of fractures sustained each year, age of presentation to the Emergency Department and mechanism of injury were compared between the preterm and term groups using statistical analysis (χ2 and Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables). Simple linear regression was performed on the total number of fractures sustained by age 3. RESULTS: Forty-four children with fractures were included. Of these, none were born extremely preterm, 24 (55%) were preterm, and 20 (45%) were born at term. Mean gestational ages of the preterm and term groups were 32 weeks 3 days and 39 weeks 6 days, respectively. There were no extremely low birth weight or very low birth weight children. There was no significant difference in the number of fractures sustained yearly, the age of presentation to the Emergency Department or the site of fracture between preterm and term groups. Linear regression showed that the total number of fractures sustained by age 3 years was unrelated to prematurity status, gender or birth weight category. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in fracture number or pattern was identified.


Assuntos
Doenças do Prematuro , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 37(2): 499-509, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32901296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Shunt insertion for hydrocephalus is a common paediatric neurosurgery procedure. Shunt complications are frequent with an estimated 20-40% failure rate within the first year, and 4.5% per year subsequently. We have an open-door 'possible shunt malfunction' pathway for children treated with a shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy, providing direct ward access to ensure rapid assessment and timely management of children. OBJECTIVE: To audit the 'possible shunt malfunction' pathway in terms of clinical outcomes (percentage-confirmed shunt dysfunction and number of re-attendances) and costs. METHODS: Clinical data for patients attending the triage service were prospectively recorded over 7 months-including the number of attendances, previous shunt revisions, shunt type, investigations performed (CT, x-rays), and outcome. Costings (e.g. costs of physician, inpatient stay, investigations) were obtained from the hospital's procurement department. RESULTS: In the study period, there were 81 attendances by 62 patients and only 16% of attendances resulted in surgical management (either shunt revision or ETV). Approximately 17% of patients re-attended at least once. The average cost per attendance in our pathway was £765.57 ($969.63; €858.73). The total expenditure for the pathway over 7 months was £62,011.03 ($78,540.07; €69,556.81), with inpatient stay making up the biggest percentage of cost (49.2%). CONCLUSION: Only 16% (13 attendances) of those attending through our pathway required neurosurgical intervention. Investigations for possible blocked shunt come at significant health, social, and financial cost. High rates of shunt failure, re-attendance, investigations, and inpatient stays incur a sizable financial burden to the healthcare system.


Assuntos
Hidrocefalia , Neuroendoscopia , Terceiro Ventrículo , Criança , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/cirurgia , Lactente , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terceiro Ventrículo/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ventriculostomia
5.
World Neurosurg ; 138: 227-230, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32173546

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pial arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are rare intracranial vascular lesions consisting of 1 or more feeder arteries connecting directly to a venous system without a nidus, in the subpial space. Because of the high-flow system, they are commonly associated with a large varix. They are thought to represent between 1.6% and 7.3% of all pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Morbidity and mortality is high in this condition and surgical or endovascular treatment options are usually considered. There have been limited reports on the clinical features, treatment options, and outcomes of pial AVMs due to its rarity. We present a case study of a pediatric patient in our institution and her clinical course, focusing on her presenting clinical features and management. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 1-year-old girl presents with progressively prominent and dilated facial veins and no other features suggestive of pial AVF. She was diagnosed with pial AVF with two feeder arteries and a large varix on imaging. Embolization was undertaken 3 times before successful surgical disconnection was done. Genetic testing for associated syndromes were all negative. CONCLUSIONS: Prominence of facial veins could be 1 of the more uncommon presenting features of pial AVFs. Genetic testing should always be considered in the pediatric population diagnosed with AVFs because of their association to various syndromes. Despite endovascular embolization being considered the less invasive choice, decision on mode of treatment should be a multifactorial decision.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/terapia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Pia-Máter/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Pia-Máter/irrigação sanguínea , Pia-Máter/patologia
6.
Pediatr Radiol ; 48(11): 1537-1549, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29907939

RESUMO

Metabolic bone disease of prematurity is characterised by disordered bone mineralisation and is therefore an increased fracture risk. Preterm infants are especially at risk due to incomplete in utero bone accretion during the last trimester. Currently, diagnosing metabolic bone disease mainly relies on biochemistry and radiographs. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound (US) are used less frequently. However, biochemical measurements correlate poorly with bone mineralisation and although scoring systems exist for metabolic bone disease, radiographs are subjective and do not detect early features of osteopenia. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is the reference standard for determining bone density in older children and adults. However, challenges with this method include movement artefact, difficulty scanning small and sick infants and a lack of normative data for young children. Quantitative US has a relatively low cost, is radiation-free and portable, and may hence be suitable for assessing bone status in preterm infants. This review aims to provide an overview of the use of quantitative US in detecting metabolic bone disease in preterm infants.


Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Prematuro/diagnóstico por imagem , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Absorciometria de Fóton , Densidade Óssea , Humanos , Recém-Nascido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...