RESUMO
Objectives: To review methodologies and outcomes reporting among these studies and to develop a conceptual framework of outcomes to assist in guiding studies and production of clinical metrics. Data sources: PubMed and Embase from January 1, 2012, thru December 1, 2021. Study eligibility criteria: Studies evaluating highly multiplex molecular respiratory diagnostics and their impact on either clinical or economic outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) of methodologies and outcomes reporting was performed. A qualitative synthesis of identified SLRs and associated primary studies was conducted to develop conceptual framework for outcomes. Results: Ultimately, 4 systemic literature reviews and their 12 associated primary studies were selected for review. Most primary studies included patient outcomes focusing on antimicrobial exposure changes such as antibiotic (80%) and antiviral use (50%) or occupancy changes such as hospital length of stay (60%). Economic outcomes were infrequently reported, and societal outcomes, such as antibiotic resistance impact, were absent from the reviewed literature. Qualitative evidence synthesis of reported outcomes yielded a conceptual framework of outcomes to include operational, patient, economic, and societal domains. Conclusions: Our review highlights the significant heterogeneity in outcomes reporting among clinical impact studies for highly multiplex molecular respiratory diagnostics. Furthermore, we developed a conceptual framework of outcomes domains that may act as a guide to improve considerations in outcomes selection and reporting when evaluating clinical impact of these tests. These improvements may be important in synthesizing the evidence for informing clinical decision making, guidelines, and financial reimbursement.
RESUMO
Diagnostics are fundamental for successful outbreak containment. In this supplement, 'Diagnostic preparedness for WHO Blueprint pathogens', we describe specific diagnostic challenges presented by selected priority pathogens most likely to cause future epidemics. Some challenges to diagnostic preparedness are common to all outbreak situations, as highlighted by recent outbreaks of Ebola, Zika and yellow fever. In this article, we review these overarching challenges and explore potential solutions. Challenges include fragmented and unreliable funding pathways, limited access to specimens and reagents, inadequate diagnostic testing capacity at both national and community levels of healthcare and lack of incentives for companies to develop and manufacture diagnostics for priority pathogens during non-outbreak periods. Addressing these challenges in an efficient and effective way will require multiple stakeholders-public and private-coordinated in implementing a holistic approach to diagnostics preparedness. All require strengthening of healthcare system diagnostic capacity (including surveillance and education of healthcare workers), establishment of sustainable financing and market strategies and integration of diagnostics with existing mechanisms. Identifying overlaps in diagnostic development needs across different priority pathogens would allow more timely and cost-effective use of resources than a pathogen by pathogen approach; target product profiles for diagnostics should be refined accordingly. We recommend the establishment of a global forum to bring together representatives from all key stakeholders required for the response to develop a coordinated implementation plan. In addition, we should explore if and how existing mechanisms to address challenges to the vaccines sector, such as Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Gavi, could be expanded to cover diagnostics.