Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Status epilepticus (SE) is the second most common neurological emergency in adults. Despite improvements in the management of acute neurological conditions over the last decade, mortality is still durably high. Because a gap has emerged between SE management based on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and actual clinical practice, we conducted a systematic review of CPGs, assessing their quality, outlining commonalities and discrepancies in recommendations, and highlighting research gaps. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases and other gray literature sources (nine among guideline registries, evidence-based medicine databases, point-of-care tools; seven websites of governmental organizations and international neurologic societies) in December 2021 (updated in November 2023). The units of analysis were CPGs that included recommendations on the diagnostic and/or therapeutic management of SE in adults. The quality of the CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II tool. RESULTS: Fifteen CPGs were included. The "Applicability" domain was assigned the lowest median score of 10%. The domains "Stakeholder Involvement", "Rigor of Development," and "Editorial Independence" were as well generally underrated. Recommendations on general and diagnostic management and on organizational interventions were fragmented and scattered. Recommendations on pre-hospital and hospital treatment of early-onset and refractory SE were broadly agreed, whereas there was less agreement on the treatment model and medications for established SE and super-refractory SE. SIGNIFICANCE: The CPGs for the management of SE developed in recent years are flawed by several methodological issues and discrepancies in the coverage of important topics. The gap between CPG-based management of SE and actual clinical practice may be due in part to the inherent limitations of the CPGs produced so far.

Epileptiform patterns predicting unfavorable outcome in postanoxic patients: A matter of time?

OBJECTIVE: Historically, epileptiform malignant EEG patterns (EMPs) have been considered to anticipate an unfavorable outcome, but an increasing amount of evidence suggests that they are not always or invariably associated with poor prognosis. We evaluated the prognostic significance of an EMP onset in two different timeframes in comatose patients after cardiac arrest (CA): early-EMPs and late-EMPs, respectively. METHODS: We included all comatose post-CA survivors admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) between 2016 and 2018 who underwent at least two 30-minute EEGs, collected at T0 (12-36 h after CA) and T1 (36-72 h after CA). All EEGs recordings were re-analyzed following the 2021 ACNS terminology by two senior EEG specialists, blinded to outcome. Malignant EEGs with abundant sporadic spikes/sharp waves, rhythmic and periodic patterns, or electrographic seizure/status epilepticus, were included in the EMP definition. The primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) score at 6 months, dichotomized as good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients and 116 EEG recording were included in the study. Poor outcome was seen in 28 (48%) patients. In contrast to late-EMPs, early-EMPs were associated with a poor outcome (p = 0.037), persisting after multiple regression analysis. Moreover, a multivariate binomial model coupling the timing of EMP onset with other EEG predictors such as T1 reactivity and T1 normal voltage background can predict outcome in the presence of an otherwise non-specific malignant EEG pattern with quite high specificity (82%) and moderate sensitivity (77%). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic significance of EMPs seems strongly time-dependent and only their early-onset may be associated with an unfavorable outcome. The time of onset of EMP combined with other EEG features could aid in defining prognosis in patients with intermediate EEG patterns.

Sleep macro- and micro-structure in autoimmune encephalitis: single case report from the subacute phase of the disease to the follow-up.

Sleep disorders are frequently described in autoimmune encephalitis (AE); however, data on sleep texture are fragmentary. We analyzed the polysomnography of a woman affected by AE, and we performed cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) scoring during the subacute phase of the disease and at follow-up. The first polysomnography showed deviations both at macro and microstructure levels, with a marked reduction of CAP rate compare to healthy sleepers (20.8% vs 33%). After 6-months sleep macrostructure improved, whilst CAP parameters remained abnormal. This is the first polysomnographic analysis, comprehensive of microstructural data, performed in AE. We briefly discuss the results.

Intravenous brivaracetam in status epilepticus: A multicentric retrospective study in Italy.

PURPOSE: to evaluate the use, effectiveness, and adverse events of intravenous brivaracetam (BRV) in status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: a retrospective multicentric study involving 24 Italian neurology units was performed from March 2018 to June 2020. A shared case report form was used across participating centres to limit biases of retrospective data collection. Diagnosis and classification of SE followed the 2015 ILAE proposal. We considered a trial with BRV a success when it was the last administered drug prior the clinical and/or EEG resolution of seizures, and the SE did not recur during hospital observation. In addition, we considered cases with early response, defined as SE resolved within 6 h after BRV administration. RESULTS: 56 patients were included (mean age 62 years; 57 % male). A previous diagnosis of epilepsy was present in 21 (38 %). Regarding SE etiology classification 46 % were acute symptomatic, 18 % remote and 16 % progressive symptomatic. SE episodes with prominent motor features were the majority (80 %). BRV was administered as first drug after benzodiazepine failure in 21 % episodes, while it was used as the second or the third (or more) drug in the 38 % and 38 % of episodes respectively. The median loading dose was 100 mg (range 50-300 mg). BRV was effective in 32 cases (57 %). An early response was documented in 22 patients (39 % of the whole sample). The use of the BRV within 6 h from SE onset was independently associated to an early SE resolution (OR 32; 95 % CI 3.39-202; p = 0.002). No severe treatment emergent adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: BRV proved to be useful and safe for the treatment of SE. Time to seizures resolution appears shorter when it is administered in the early phases of SE.