High-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy as primary treatment of prostate cancer: genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicity and outcomes, a single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: Prostatectomy, radiotherapy and watchful waiting are the main therapeutic options available for local stage of prostate cancer (PCa). We report our experience on 394 patients affected by prostate cancer primarily treated with high-dose, image-guided, IMRT, focusing on gastrointestinal, genitourinary toxicities and biochemical control. METHODS: From July 2003 to August 2014, 394 patients were treated with radical high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT) for prostate cancer; the mean total radiation dose was 79 Gy in standard fractions. Hormonal therapy (HT) was administered to 7.6% of low-risk patients, to 20.3% of intermediate-risk patients and to 72% of high-risk patients. Patients were evaluated for biochemical failure, local recurrence (LR) and metastases. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (26.65%) developed acute GU toxicity at the medium dose of 25.4 Gy, grade 1 (G1) or grade 2 (G2) in 94 cases. Only 16 patients (4.06%) reported chronic GU toxicity (G1 or G2), and one case developed G3 cystitis. No G3 GI acute and late toxicity were detected. Fifty-six (14.2%) patients experienced LR, 26 (6.6%) developed metastases and 70 patients (17.8%) were deceased. Gleason sum score > 7 was predictive for worse overall survival (GS = 7 was borderline) and for metastasis. No factors resulted predictive for local relapse. HT pre-RT had been demonstrated as a negative predictor for OS and DFS-DM. CONCLUSIONS: Data confirm the safety of HDRT for PCa. Treatment was efficient with low toxicity profile. Moreover, continued technologic advancements, as image-guided radiotherapy, could lead to further reduction in toxicity, thus increasing the therapeutic index.

A matched cohort study of radio-chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in soft tissue sarcoma patients.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard postoperative treatment after conservative surgery in high risk soft tissue sarcoma. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is still debated. Therefore, a matched cohort analysis was performed in high risk soft tissue patients to analyse differences in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity between patients treated with concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each patient in RT group was selected a patient in the RTCT group matching for age, T stage and grading. Acute and late toxicity were recorded, overall survival, recurrence free survival and distant metastases free survival were analysed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Ninety patients were selected, half of patients underwent radio-chemotherapy and half received radiotherapy alone. During the treatment Grade 3 dermatitis was recorded in 15 (16.7%) patients, 6 (6.7%) patients associated chemotherapy and during follow up 12 (13.3%) patients developed grade 2 late fibrosis, 3 (3.3%) joint stiffness and 1 (1.1%) patient experienced a bone fracture. There were no differences in the rate of acute and late toxicity between RTCT and RT alone group. Nineteen (21.1%) patients developed local recurrence, overall 5-year local relapse free survival was 83%. There were no differences between the two groups. 29 patients developed distant metastases, 14 (15.6%) patients in the RTCT group and 15 (16.7%) patients in the RT group. The 5-year distant metastases free survival was 67%. Age > 65 years was the only independent factor affecting distant recurrence (HR = 5.7, 95% CI 2.7-11.9; p = 0.001). At the time of analysis 15 (16.7%) patients were dead, 6 (6.7%) patients in the RTCT group and 9 (10%) patients in the RT group. 5-years overall survival was: 88%. At multivariate analysis age > 65 years was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (HR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.1, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective randomized studies with large size population and with subgroup analysis for histological subtypes are necessary to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma patients. Tailored treatment has to be considered in elderly soft tissue patients to guarantee a better outcome in this high risk and fragile population.

Influence of age and subtype in outcome of operable liposarcoma.

AIM: Liposarcoma (LPS) is rare tumor deriving from adipocytes. LPS is classified into histological subtypes: well-differentiated (WDLPS), dedifferentiated (DDLPS), myxoid (MLPS) and pleomorphic (PLPS). A tailored approach taking into account the specificity of disease subtype and age at presentation could be helpful in delineating therapeutic management of liposarcoma. In this paper, we report a retrospective series of a single-institution cohort of patients with LPS, undergoing surgery and radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether clinical characteristics, tumor- and treatment-related features affect clinical outcome in patients treated with curative intent for non-metastatic liposarcoma. METHODS: Data of patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic liposarcoma treated between 1990 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Data about patient, tumor and treatment features were collected. Two patients subgroups were identified according to age (cutoff: age < 65 years or > 65 years). Statistical analysis was performed to assess correlation between the above-cited variables and local recurrence-free survival (DFS-LR), distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS); moreover, differences in clinical outcome between the two age groups were identified. RESULTS: Data of 186 patients were collected. At diagnosis, 27.4% of patients were 65 years or older. At a median follow-up of 8.6 years (range 0.1-27.3 years), Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis showed that LR, DM, OS and DSS were 75.5%, 76.6%, 48.1% and 72.1%, respectively. KM analysis showed that age > 65, DDLPS and lower limb localization were related to LR (p = 0.001, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Association between LR, age and DDLPS persisted both at univariate (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0001, respectively) and multivariate Cox regression (CR) analysis (p = 0.024 and p = 0.002). Age, tumor depth and grading influenced distant recurrence, both at KM (p = 0.023, p = 0.026 and p = 0.016) and univariate CR (p = 0.026, p = 0.042 and p = 0.012). Age and grading were confirmed at multivariate analysis (p = 0.009 and p = 0.017). Patients with WDLPS and wide excision had significantly better OS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively), while histological G3 and age > 65 were related with worse OS (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Age, DDLPS and grade were related to OS at univariate (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.03, respectively) and multivariate CR analysis (p = 0.031, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively). However, analyzing the specific causes of death, female died less often for tumor-related causes, with a DSS of 91.0% compared to 57.4% of male counterpart (p = 0.005). At Kaplan-Meier analysis, postoperative radiotherapy resulted in a statistically significant better disease-specific survival than postoperative radiotherapy (82.9% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.045). High grade correlated with poorer disease-specific survival (59.3%) than intermediate and low grade (73.4% and 91.6%, respectively) (p = 0.008). Association between DSS, sex and grade persisted both at univariate (p = 0.008 and p = 0.022, respectively) and multivariate Cox regression (CR) analysis (p = 0.014 and p = 0.038). Histotype-driven schedules of treatment should be developed to take into account biological heterogeneity of this disease. Further studies are needed to stratify patients subgroup and develop tailored treatment strategies (i.e., altered fractionations and different chemotherapy regimens in aggressive subtypes), in particular more prospective trials are needed to develop treatment guidelines in elderly STS, taking into account the frailty and the peculiarity of this subgroup.