[Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in challenging cases]. / Nefrectomía laparoscópica asistida por la mano en casos difíciles.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with significant complicating clinical factors. METHODS: A retrospective assessment was made of 100 laparoscopic nephrectomies performed at a single hospital from 2001 to 2005. Patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery, prior procedures on the involved kidney, evidence of perirenal inflammation, renal lesions 10 cm or more in diameter, or level I renal vein thrombosis were enrolled. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled. Of these, 5 had a lesion at least 10 cm in diameter, 2 had renal vein thrombosis, and 5 reported major abdominal surgery. Most patients had more than one of these findings. Three patients showed inflammatory conditions (staghorn calculi) and a T4 renal tumor was successfully treated without conversion to open surgery. Mean operating time and blood loss were 210 minutes and 310 ml respectively, while mean length of hospital stay was 3 days. No patient required conversion to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy is an attractive minimally invasive option for technically challenging tumors and has reasonable operating times, blood losses, and complication rates.

Nefrectomía laparoscópica asistida por la mano en casos difíciles / Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in challenging cases

Objetivo: evaluar los resultados de nefrectomía laparoscópica asistida por la mano en pacientes con masas renales técnicamente complejas. Métodos: se ha realizado una evaluación retrospectiva de 100 nefrectomías laparoscópicas realizadas en un solo hospital entre 2001 y 2005. Se ha seleccionado a los pacientes con antecedentes de cirugía abdominal previa, procedimientos previos en el riñón afectado, evidencia de inflamación perirrenal, lesiones renales de más de 10 cm de diámetro o trombosis venosa renal tipo I. Resultados: se ha incluido un total de 12 pacientes; 5 de ellos presentaban una lesión de al menos 10 cm de diámetro, dos trombosis venosa renal y 5 referían cirugía abdominal mayor. La mayoría de los pacientes tenía más de uno de estos hallazgos. Tres pacientes presentaban procesos inflamatorios (cálculos coraliformes) y un tumor renal T4 fue tratado con éxito, sin necesidad de reconversión. El tiempo operatorio y la pérdida sanguínea medias fueron de 210 minutos y 310 ml, respectivamente, con una estancia media de tres días. Ningún paciente requirió reconversión a cirugía abierta. Conclusiones: la nefrectomía laparoscópica asistida por la mano es una opción mínimamente invasiva, atractiva en el contexto de masas técnicamente complejas, con un tiempo operatorio, una pérdida sanguínea y una tasa de complicaciones razonables (AU)

Objective: To assess the outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with significant complicating clinical factors. Methods: A retrospective assessment was made of 100 laparoscopic nephrectomies performed at a single hospital from 2001 to 2005. Patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery, prior procedures on the involved kidney, evidence of perirenal inflammation, renal lesions 10 cm or more in diameter, or level I renal vein thrombosis were enrolled. Results: Twelve patients were enrolled. Of these, 5 had a lesion at least 10 cm in diameter, 2 had renal vein thrombosis, and 5 reported major abdominal surgery. Most patients had more than one of these findings. Three patients showed inflammatory conditions (staghorn calculi) and a T4 renal tumor was successfully treated without conversion to open surgery. Mean operating time and blood loss were 210 minutes and 310 ml respectively, while mean length of hospital stay was 3 days. No patient required conversion to open surgery. Conclusions: Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy is an attractive minimally invasive option for technically challenging tumors and has reasonable operating times, blood losses, and complication rates (AU)

[Clinical efficacy of prostatic biopsy. Experience in our center from 1990 to 2002]. / Eficacia clínica de la biopsia prostática. Experiencia en nuestro centro 1990-2002.

INTRODUCTION: The prostate biopsy is the only valid tool to diagnose the existence of cancer of prostate. The indications of the biopsy, according with EAU, are the existence of high PSA, increased velocity PSA and a rectal suspicious tact. OBJECTIVES: validation of the utility of the prostate biopsy, to know the value of the PSA as a marker of prostate cancer in our way and to value the indication and efficiency of repeated biopsies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: we practice a manual review of the biopsies in our hospital, between the years 1990 and 2002. We study the level of PSA before the biopsy, number of prostatic cores and histologic information of the biopsy. A statistical descriptive and inferencial study has been performed by SPSS 12.0 package. RESULTS: The total number of biopsies registered was a 1202, with 36.96% of biopsy positive. The PSA before the biopsy (available in the biopsies realized between the year 1999 and 2002: 578 biopsies, 48.08% of the whole) was > 10 ng/ml in 55,88% of these patients, 4-10 ng/ml in 39.27% and 0-4 ng/ml in 4.84%. The average and PSA's median is of 19.09 (standard error: 1.87) and 10.6, respectively. The positividad of the biopsy increases with PSA's level: 48,61% with PSA > 10; 25.11% with PSA 4-10 and 21,4% in patients with PSA < 4. There was realized prostate rebiopsy (2 or more biopsies) in 132 patients (21.97% positive) 88,36% of the cancers was diagnosed in the first biopsy, and 6.62% in the second one (94,98% of the diagnoses of cancer of prostate carried out with the first 2 biopsies). CONCLUSIONS: The information obtained in the study by means of the descriptive analysis of our series meets in conformity the published in other studies and publications. There exists a need to increase the diagnostic profitability of the biopsy of prostate, for which we have introduced a protocol of biopsy under local anesthesia in order to be able to increase the number of obtained cylinders.

Eficacia clínica de la biopsia prostática. Experiencia en nuestro centro 1990-2002 / Clinical efficacy of prostatic biopsy. Experience in our center from 1990 to 2002

Introducción: La biopsia prostática es la única herramienta válida para diagnosticar la existencia de cáncer de próstata. Las indicaciones para su realización según la Asociación Europea de Urología son la existencia de PSA elevado, velocidad aumentada y la evidencia de un tacto rectal sospechoso. Objetivos: Valoración tanto de la utilidad clínica de la biopsia prostática, como del PSA como marcador de cáncer de próstata en nuestro medio y la indicación y eficacia de sucesivas biopsias. Material y Métodos: Efectuamos una revisión manual de las biopsias realizadas en nuestro servicio entre los años 1990 y 2002, valorando nivel de PSA previo a la biopsia, número de cilindros obtenidos y datos de la biopsia. Se llevó a cabo un estudio estadístico descriptivo mediante el programa estadístico SPSS 12.0. Resultados: Se han realizado 1202 biopsias en este periodo, con un porcentaje de positividad global del 36.96%. El PSA previo a la biopsia (disponible en las biopsias realizadas entre los años 1999 y 2002: 578 biopsias, 48.08% del total) era >10 ng/ml en el 55,88% de estos pacientes, 4-10 ng/ml en el 39.27% y 0-4ng/ml en el 4,84%. La media y mediana de PSA es de 19,09 (error típico: 1,87) y 10,6, respectivamente. La positividad de la biopsia aumenta con el nivel de PSA: 21,4% en pacientes con PSA<4; 25,11% con PSA 4-10 y 48,61% con PSA >10. Fue realizada rebiopsia prostática en 132 pacientes (21,97% positivas) El 88,36%de los cánceres fueron diagnosticados en la primera biopsia, y un 6,62% en la segunda (94,98% de los diagnósticos de cáncer de próstata se realizaron con las 2 primeras biopsias). Conclusiones: Los datos obtenidos en el estudio mediante el análisis descriptivo de nuestra serie se encuentran en concordancia con lo publicado en otros estudios y publicaciones. Existe una necesidad de aumentar la rentabilidad diagnóstica de la biopsia de próstata, para lo cual hemos introducido un protocolo de biopsia bajo anestesia local con el fin de poder aumentar el número de cilindros obtenidos (AU)

Introduction: The prostate biopsy is the only valid tool to diagnose the existence of cancer of prostate. The indications of the biopsy, according with EAU, are the existence of high PSA, increased velocity PSA and a rectal suspicious tact. Objectives: validation of the utility of the prostate biopsy, to know the value of the PSA as a marker of prostate cancer in our way and to value the indication and efficiency of repeated biopsies. Material and methods: we practice a manual review of the biopsies in our hospital, between the years 1990 and 2002. We study the level of PSA before the biopsy, number of prostatic cores and histologic information of the biopsy. A statistical descriptive and inferencial study has been performed by SPSS 12.0 package. Results: The total number of biopsies registered was a 1202, with 36.96 % of biopsy positive. The PSA before the biopsy (available in the biopsies realized between the year 1999 and 2002: 578 biopsies, 48.08 % of the whole) was> 10 ng/ml in 55,88 % of these patients, 4-10 ng/ml in 39.27 % and 0-4ng/ml in 4.84 %. The average and PSA’s median is of 19.09 (standard error: 1.87) and 10.6, respectively. The positividad of the biopsy increases with PSA’s level: 48,61 % with PSA> 10; 25.11 % with PSA 4-10and 21,4 % in patients with PSA <4. There was realized prostate rebiopsy (2 ó more biopsies) in 132 patients (21,97 % positive) 88,36 % of the cancers was diagnosed in the first biopsy, and 6.62 % in the second one (94,98% of the diagnoses of cancer of prostate carried out with the first 2 biopsies).Conclusions: The information obtained in the study by means of the descriptive analysis of our series meets in conformity the published in other studies and publications. There exists a need to increase the diagnostic profitability of the biopsy of prostate, for which we have introduced a protocol of biopsy under local anesthesia in order to be able to increase the number of obtained cylinders (AU)