Bioequivalence studies of two different film-coated tablet formulations of valacyclovir of two different strengths in healthy volunteers.

These studies were conducted in order to assess the bioequivalence of two film-coated formulations containing 250 mg and 1000 mg of valacyclovir (INN: valaciclovir; CAS 124832-26-4), which is the L-valyl ester and a pro-drug of the antiviral drug acyclovir (INN: aciclovir). In the study with valacyclovir 250 mg, 36 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, single-dose, open-label, 2-way crossover study, with a washout period of 10 days. In the study with valacyclovir 1000 mg, 46 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, single-dose, open-label, 2-way crossover study, with a washout period of 7 days. Plasma samples were collected up to 36 h postdose for both studies. Valacyclovir levels were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass detection (ie, the LC/MS/MS method) (lower limit of quantification: 0.50 ng/ mL for valacyclovir and 9.93 ng/mL for acyclovir for the 250 mg study and 1.00 ng/mL for valacyclovir and 20.00 ng/ mL for acyclovir for the 1000 mg study). Pharmacokinetic parameters used for bioequivalence assessment were the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last non-zero concentration (AUC(0-t)) and from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-inf) and maximum observed concentration (C(max)). These parameters were determined from the valacyclovir concentration data using non-compartmental analysis. In the tained by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for valacyclovir were 107.54-124.26% for C(max), 95.45-103.46% for AUC(0-Inf) and 95.53-103.63% for AUC(0-t) whereas for acyclovir the 90% confidence intervals obtained were 103.19-117.02% for C(max), 99.61-106.92% for AUC(0-Inf) and 99.58-106.94% for AUC(0-t). In the study with valacyclovir 1000 mg formulations, the 90% confidence intervals obtained for valacyclovir were 93.20-107.35% for C(max), 90.87-96.27% for AUC(0-inf) and 90.87-96.27% for AUC(0-t) whereas for acyclovir the 90% CIs obtained were 95.98-104.94% for C(max), 97.13-103.94% for AUC(0-inf) and 97.14-104.09% for AUC(0-t). All the 90% confidence intervals obtained for all the parameters assessed were within the predefined range (80-125%). Based on these results, it can be concluded that the evaluated formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of absorption.

Mycophenolate mofetil 500-mg tablet under fasting conditions: single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, four-way replicate crossover, bioequivalence study in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA), is an immunosuppressive agent indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in allogeneic kidney, heart, or liver transplant recipients. The European regulatory authorities require bioequivalence studies for the marketing of generic products. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of a generic (test) and branded (reference) formulation of MMF 500 mg and MPA. METHODS: This single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study was conducted at Anapharm's Clinical Research Facility, Québec, Québec, Canada. Healthy volunteers aged 18 to 55 years were eligible. Subjects were assigned to receive, in randomized order, a single dose of the test and reference formulations of MMF 500 mg under fasting conditions. Because the study design was 4-way replicate, there were 2 test periods and 2 reference periods. The 4 study periods were each separated by a 14-day washout period. Blood samples were collected over a period of 12 hours after administration for the determination of MMF pharmacokinetic properties, and over 48 (+/-0.5) hours, for MPA properties. Concentrations of the analytes were determined by reverse LC and detected using LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from MMF and MPA concentration data using noncompartmental analysis. C(max) and AUC(0-t) were the primary evaluation criteria, while AUC(0-infinity) was a secondary parameter. The drugs were to be considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for the test/reference ratios of natural logarithm-transformed values of these parameters (obtained using ANOVA) were between 80% and 125%, per European regulations for bioequivalence. Tolerability was monitored using physical examination, including vital sign measurements, laboratory analysis, and adverse-events (AE) monitoring (including patient interview). RESULTS: A total of 103 subjects were enrolled (64 men, 39 women; 101 white, 2 black; mean [SD] age, 38 [10] years; weight, 68.2 [9.1] kg). The 90% CIs were as follows: MMF, C(max), 85.94% to 106.63%; AUC(0-t), 91.94% to 102.20%; and AUC(0-infinity), 93.15% to 105.48%; MPA, C(max), 92.03% to 105.82%; AUC(0-t), 97.42% to 100.59%; and AUC(0-infinity), 96.96% to 100.90%. These values met with the regulatory definition of bioequivalence. A total of 148 AEs were reported (68 in subjects who received the test treatment and 80 in subjects who received the reference treatment). The most commonly reported AEs were procedural pain (13/102 [12.7%] and 10/101 [9.9%] with the test and reference formulations, respectively), procedural site reaction (12 [11.8%] and 4 [4.0%]), and somnolence (7 [6.9%] and 14 [13.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: The generic and branded formulations of MMF 500 mg met the European regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence, based on the rate and extent of absorption of a single dose under fasting conditions. Both formulations were well tolerated in these healthy volunteers.

Bioequivalence study of two enteric-coated formulations of pantoprazole in healthy volunteers under fed conditions.

This study was conducted in order to assess the bioequivalence of two enteric-coated formulations of 40 mg pantoprazole (CAS 102625-70-7), under fed conditions. Seventy-four healthy subjects, age ranging from 24 to 55 years, were enrolled in a two-centre, randomised, single-dose, open-label, 2-way crossover study, with a minimum washout period of 7 days. Plasma samples were collected up to 30.0 h post-dosing. Pantoprazole levels were determined by reverse liquid chromatography and detected by tandem mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS/ MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters used for bioequivalence assessment were the AUClast (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last observed non-zero concentration), AUCinf (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) and Cmax, (maximum observed concentration). These parameters were determined from the pantoprazole concentration data using non-compartmental analysis. Gender-related differences were found in the variability of all relevant pharmacokinetic parameters. The 90% CI (90% confidence intervals), obtained by analysis of variance (ANOVA) were within the predefined ranges. Bioequivalence between the test and reference formulation, under fed conditions, was concluded both in terms of rate and extent of absorption.