Examining ways to score the Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory in parents of young children.

The Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory (EPII) is a 92-item measure developed to assess tangible impacts of the pandemic including both negative (work, home, social, and health) and positive changes. The EPII has been used in a variety of studies, but a standard scoring system has not been determined. Parents of young children (N = 216) completed the EPII, Perceived Stress Scale, Parenting Stress Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-PA and PANAS-NA), and COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS) online September 2021-May 2022. The EPII was scored in three ways represented in the literature to examine which scoring method accounted for the greatest amount of variance in parents' stress and mood, independent of demographic factors and CSS. Hierarchical linear regression results revealed that one EPII scoring method consistently accounted for the greatest amount of variance in each outcome variable (largest R2) compared to the other two scoring methods. Additionally, number of negative and positive pandemic impacts accounted for more variance (larger ß coefficient) in each outcome compared to demographic factors and CSS, with the exception that negative pandemic impacts were not associated with PANAS-PA. One method of scoring the EPII may maximize the measures' potential to account for variance in stress and mood among parents of young children. The EPII may be a valuable measure to include in studies examining the impact of the pandemic on parents' well-being even beyond the peak of the pandemic, as its association with stress and mood appears to be long-lasting and independent of demographic factors and COVID-19 stress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Potentially morally injurious events as a mediator of the association of gratitude and mindfulness with distress.

OBJECTIVE: Potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) are events that contradict one's own personal ethics and may promote a deep sense of violation, leading to psychological distress. Individuals with greater trait gratitude and mindfulness may be less likely to perceive events as being morally injurious and may, in turn, be less likely to experience subsequent distress. The current study seeks to examine (a) PMIE rates in a multioccupational first responder sample and (b) the indirect effect of trait gratitude and mindfulness on psychological distress via fewer perceived PMIEs. METHOD: 293 first responders from agencies/departments within southeastern Texas (in-person) and nationwide (online) completed a survey assessing PMIEs, PTSD symptoms (PCL-C), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-8), gratitude (GRAT-S), and mindfulness (MAAS). RESULTS: PMIEs were common (61% witnessed a transgression; 21% committed a transgression; 40% felt betrayed by others). Gratitude was indirectly associated with fewer PTSD [-.09, 95% CI (-.13, -.05)], anxiety [-.03, 95% CI (-.04, -.01)], and depression [-.03, 95% CI (-.05, -.01)] symptoms via lower PMIEs. Similarly, mindfulness was indirectly associated with fewer PTSD [-.92, 95% CI (-1.55, -.38)], anxiety [-.20, 95% CI (-.42, .02)], and depression [-.26, 95% CI (-.48, -.06)] symptoms via lower PMIEs. CONCLUSIONS: PMIEs were common in this first responder sample and associated with increased distress. Trait gratitude and mindfulness may protect first responders from perceiving events as morally injurious, which may lead to improved mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

A systematic review of behavioral interventions for rural breast cancer survivors.

Rural breast cancer survivors (RBCS) are at greater risk for poorer health outcomes and face greater treatment barriers compared to their urban counterparts, necessitating behavioral interventions tailored for the unique needs of RBCS. A systematic review of studies examining behavioral interventions delivered to RBCS living in the United States from 2000 to 2020 was conducted following PRIMSA guidelines. Nineteen unique studies were included: eight randomized controlled trials, two matched-control studies, six pre-post intervention feasibility studies, and three post-intervention satisfaction studies. Thirteen interventions aimed to improve psychosocial support, three to improve weight management, and three to improve education. Results indicate interventions' feasibility and acceptability. Six out of eight intervention conditions reported favorable outcomes compared to control conditions, suggesting promise for efficacy. However, variability in intervention objective, duration, delivery, and follow-up timing, and small sample sizes prevent overarching conclusions. Research involving larger sample sizes, higher quality control groups, and longer follow-up data is needed.

Psychological Assessment Instruments for Use in Liver and Kidney Transplant Evaluations: Scarcity of Evidence and Recommendations.

Psychopathology among liver and kidney transplant patients is prevalent. Although pre-surgical psychological evaluations are routinely conducted, understanding which specific psychological test to use is under-developed. The purpose of this review is to examine the psychometric properties of broadband and narrowband psychological measures in pre-surgical liver and kidney transplant evaluations. Overall, there is a paucity of research in this domain that hamper abilities to make clear recommendations on what to use alongside a clinical interview. This review highlights the need for additional research examining instruments that may predict patients' successful recovery from transplant surgery. Despite the scarcity of research, instruments that appear to be useful in this population include the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2), the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT), and the Transplant Evaluation and Rating Scale (TERS).