Sex differences in mortality of older adults with falls after emergency department consultation: FALL-ER registry.

BACKGROUND: To investigate if sex is a risk factor for mortality in patients consulting at the emergency department (ED) for an unintentional fall. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the FALL-ER registry, a cohort of patients ≥65 years with an unintentional fall presenting to one of 5 Spanish EDs during 52 predefined days (one per week during one year). We collected 18 independent patient baseline and fall-related variables. Patients were followed for 6 months and all-cause mortality recorded. The association between biological sex and mortality was expressed as unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with the 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and subgroup analyses were performed by assessing the interaction of sex with all baseline and fall-related mortality risk variables. RESULTS: Of 1315 enrolled patients (median age 81 years), 411 were men (31%) and 904 women (69%). The 6-month mortality was higher in men (12.4% vs. 5.2%, HR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.65-3.71), although age was similar between sexes. Men had more comorbidity, previous hospitalizations, loss of consciousness, and an intrinsic cause for falling. Women more frequently lived alone, with self-reported depression, and the fall results in a fracture and immobilization. Nonetheless, after adjustment for age and these eight divergent variables, older men aged 65 and over still showed a significantly higher mortality (HR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.39-3.45), with the highest risk observed during the first month after ED presentation (HR = 4.18, 95% CI = 1.31-13.3). We found no interaction between sex and any patient-related or fall-related variables with respect to mortality (p > 0.05 in all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex is a risk factor for death following ED presentation for a fall in the older population adults aged 65 and over. The causes for this risk should be investigated in future studies.

Pacientes ancianos atendidos en urgencias por caídas (Registro FALL-ER): probabilidad de nuevas caídas y factores asociados / Probability of new falls and factors associated with them in aged patients treated in emergency departments after falling: data from the FALL-ER registry

Objetivo: Investigar las características asociadas a una nueva caída tras la atención en urgencias por una caída no intencionada y desarrollar un modelo de riesgo para predecirla.Método: El registro FALL-ER incluye pacientes de 65 años o más atendidos por una caída no intencionada en cinco servicios de urgencias españoles. Las variables independientes incluyeron características basales del paciente, de la caída, consecuencias inmediatas y situación funcional al alta. Se realizó seguimiento telefónico para saber si habían existidonuevas caídas en los 6 meses posteriores. Mediante un análisis ajustado se identificaron las variables independientes asociadas a nueva caída y se desarrolló un modelo de riesgo.Resultados: Se incluyeron 1.313 pacientes y 147 presentaron una nueva caída (11,2%). Las variables asociadas a nueva caída fueron: caída en los 12 meses anteriores, enfermedad neurológica, anemia, toma de analgésicos no opiáceos, caída en domicilio y durante la noche, traumatismo craneoencefálico y necesidad de ayuda para levantarse de la silla. El modelo predictivo mostró una capacidad discriminativa moderada con un área bajo la curva de la característica operativa del receptor de 0,688 (IC 95%: 0,640-0,736). La probabilidad de sufrir una nueva caída fue de 3,5%, 10,5% y 23,3% en los pacientes clasificados como de riesgo bajo, intermedio y alto respectivamente.Conclusión: Uno de cada nueve adultos mayores que consultan a urgencias por caídas no intencionadas volverán a caer durante los 6 meses siguientes. Es posible identificar un subgrupo de pacientes con riesgo incrementado en los que deberían ponerse en marcha acciones preventivas. (AU)

Objective: To identify characteristics associated with a new fall in a patient who received emergency department care after an accidental fall and to develop a risk model to predict repeated falls. Method: The FALL-ER registry included accidental falls in patients over the age of 65 years treated in 5 Spanish emergency departments. Independent variables analyzed were patient characteristics at baseline, fall characteristics, immediate consequences, and functional status on discharge. Patients were followed with telephone interviews for 6 months to record the occurrence of new falls. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with falling again and to develop a risk model. We identified 3 levels of risk for new falls (low, intermediate, and high). Results: A total of 1313 patients were studied; 147 patients (11.2%) reported having another fall. Variables associated with risk of falling again were having had a fall in the 12 months before the index fall, neurological disease, anemia, use of non-opioid analgesics, falling at home, falling at night, head injury on falling, and need for help when rising from a chair. The probability of falling again was 3.5%, 10.5%, and 23.3%, respectively, in patients at low, intermediate, and high risk. The model’s ability to discriminate was moderate: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.688 (95% CI, 0.640-0.736). Conclusion: One in 9 older adults treated in an emergency department for an accidental fall will fall again within 6 months. It is possible to identify patients at higher risk for whom preventive measures should be implemented. (AU)

Probability of new falls and factors associated with them in aged patients treated in emergency departments after falling: data from the FALL-ER registry. / Pacientes ancianos atendidos en urgencias por caídas (Registro FALL-ER): probabilidad de nuevas caídas y factores asociados.

OBJECTIVES: To identify characteristics associated with a new fall in a patient who received emergency department care after an accidental fall and to develop a risk model to predict repeated falls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The FALL-ER registry included accidental falls in patients over the age of 65 years treated in 5 Spanish emergency departments. Independent variables analyzed were patient characteristics at baseline, fall characteristics, immediate consequences, and functional status on discharge. Patients were followed with telephone interviews for 6 months to record the occurrence of new falls. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with falling again and to develop a risk model. We identified 3 levels of risk for new falls (low, intermediate, and high). RESULTS: A total of 1313 patients were studied; 147 patients (11.2%) reported having another fall. Variables associated with risk of falling again were having had a fall in the 12 months before the index fall, neurological disease, anemia, use of non-opioid analgesics, falling at home, falling at night, head injury on falling, and need for help when rising from a chair. The probability of falling again was 3.5%, 10.5%, and 23.3%, respectively, in patients at low, intermediate, and high risk. The model's ability to discriminate was moderate: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.688 (95% CI, 0.640-0.736). CONCLUSION: One in 9 older adults treated in an emergency department for an accidental fall will fall again within 6 months. It is possible to identify patients at higher risk for whom preventive measures should be implemented.

OBJETIVO: Investigar las características asociadas a una nueva caída tras la atención en urgencias por una caída no intencionada y desarrollar un modelo de riesgo para predecirla. METODO: El registro FALL-ER incluye pacientes de 65 años o más atendidos por una caída no intencionada en cinco servicios de urgencias españoles. Las variables independientes incluyeron características basales del paciente, de la caída, consecuencias inmediatas y situación funcional al alta. Se realizó seguimiento telefónico para saber si habían existido nuevas caídas en los 6 meses posteriores. Mediante un análisis ajustado se identificaron las variables independientes asociadas a nueva caída y se desarrolló un modelo de riesgo.. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 1.313 pacientes y 147 presentaron una nueva caída (11,2%). Las variables asociadas a nueva caída fueron: caída en los 12 meses anteriores, enfermedad neurológica, anemia, toma de analgésicos no opiáceos, caída en domicilio y durante la noche, traumatismo craneoencefálico y necesidad de ayuda para levantarse de la silla. El modelo predictivo mostró una capacidad discriminativa moderada con un área bajo la curva de la característica operativa del receptor de 0,688 (IC 95%: 0,640-0,736). La probabilidad de sufrir una nueva caída fue de 3,5%, 10,5% y 23,3% en los pacientes clasificados como de riesgo bajo, intermedio y alto respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: Uno de cada nueve adultos mayores que consultan a urgencias por caídas no intencionadas volverán a caer durante los 6 meses siguientes. Es posible identificar un subgrupo de pacientes con riesgo incrementado en los que deberían ponerse en marcha acciones preventivas.

180-Day functional decline among older patients attending an emergency department after a fall.

OBJECTIVES: To determine functional changes and factors affecting 180-day functional prognosis among older patients attending a hospital emergency department (ED) after a fall. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis from a prospective cohort study (FALL-ER Registry) spanning one year that included individuals aged ≥65 years attending four Spanish EDs after a fall. We collected 9 baseline and 6 fall-related factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Barthel Index (BI) was measured at baseline, discharge and 30, 90 and 180 days after the index fall. Absolute and relative BI changes were calculated. Absolute difference of ≥10 points between BI at baseline and at 180 days was considered a clinically significant functional decline. RESULTS: 452 patients (mean age 80 ±â€¯8 years; 70.8% women) were included. Baseline BI was 79.3 ±â€¯23.1 points. Compared with baseline, functional status was significantly lower at the 4 follow-up time points (-8.7% at discharge; and -6.9%, -7.9% and -9.5% at 30, 90 and 180 days; p < 0.001 for all comparisons in relation to baseline; p = 0.001 for change over time). One hundred and thirty-three (29.6%) patients had a clinically significant functional decline at 180 days. Age ≥85 years (OR = 2.24, 95%CI 1.23-4.08; p = 0.008), fall-related fracture (OR = 2.45, 95%CI 1.43-4.28; p = 0.001), hospitalization (OR = 1.91; 95%CI 1.11-3.29; p = 0.019) and post-fall syndrome (OR = 1.77, 95%CI 1.13-2.77; p = 0.013) were independently associated with 180-day clinically significant functional decline. CONCLUSION: Patients ≥65 years attending EDs after a fall experience a consistent and persistent negative impact on their functional status. Several factors may help identify patients at increased risk of functional impairment.

Perfil de los pacientes ancianos atendidos en urgencias por caídas (Registro FALL-ER): magnitud del problema y posibilidades de mejora en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios / Profile of older patients attended in the emergency department after falls: a FALL-ER registry study of the magnitude of the problem and opportunities for improving hospital emergency care

Objetivo: Estudiar el perfil de los pacientes de 65 años o más atendidos por una caída en los servicios de urgencias (SU), las características de las caídas, y el grado y los factores asociados con la realización de recomendaciones para prevenir las caídas (RPC). Método: FALL-ER es un registro de cohortes multipropósito, prospectivo y multicéntrico, con muestreo sistemático, que incluyó todos los pacientes de 65 años o más atendidos por caída en 5 SU durante 52 días en un año. Se recogieron 68 variables independientes. Los pacientes se clasificaron en función de recibir o no RPC (cualquiera de las siguientes: ejercicio, educación sobre prevención de las caídas, derivación a especialista o modificación de fármacos relacionados con las caídas). Resultados: Se analizaron 1.507 (93,6%) del total de 1.610 pacientes. Los pacientes tenían una edad muy avanzada y alto grado de comorbilidad, polifarmacia y síndromes geriátricos previos. La caída suele suceder de día, en domicilio y en la mitad de casos sin testigo. Un 48% refirió miedo a caerse, un 22% presentó deterioro funcional agudo, un 16% ingresó y un 0,6% falleció. Se realizaron RPC en 509 (33,8%) casos. La disminución de la agudeza auditiva, deterioro cognitivo autorreferido, atención médica en el lugar de la caída, miedo a volver a caerse, deterioro funcional agudo y hospitalización se asociaron con mayor probabilidad de RPC, y la disminución de la agudeza visual con menor probabilidad. Conclusiones: Solo tres de cada diez pacientes ancianos atendidos por una caída en urgencias recibe RPC posteriores, aunque existen ciertas características relacionadas con el paciente y la caída que se asocian a una mayor probabilidad de recibirlas

Objective: To profile patients aged 65 years or older who are attended in a hospital emergency department after falls. To describe the falls, their severity, and factors relevant to recommended preventive measures. Methods: The FALL-ER is a multipurpose, multicenter prospective registry of a systematically described cohort of patients aged 65 years or older attended in 5 hospital emergency departments on 52 days of the same year. We collected data on 68 independent variables. Patients were classified according to whether they had received recommendations related to preventing falls in any of the following categories: exercise, education on fall prevention, referral to a specialist or changes in medication. Results: A total of 1507 patients or carers were interviewed (93.6% of the 1610 patients in the registry). The cohort was of advanced age and had high rates of comorbidity, polypharmacy, and history of geriatric syndromes. The majority of falls occurred during the day and in the patients home. Half the falls were not witnessed. Forty-eight percent of the patients reported fear of falling, 22% had acute functional impairment, 16% were admitted, and 0.6% died in the hospital. Recommendations directed to preventing falls were received by 509 (33.8%) cases. Loss of hearing acuity, self-reported cognitive impairment, emergency first aid at the site of the fall, fear of falling again, acute functional impairment, and hospitalization were associated with a greater likelihood of receiving recommendations for preventing falls. Loss of visual acuity was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving recommendations. Conclusions: Only a third of elderly patients attended in an emergency department after falls receive recommendations that target preventing further falls. Certain patient and fall characteristics are associated with a greater likelihood of receiving such recommendations

Profile of older patients attended in the emergency department after falls: a FALL-ER registry study of the magnitude of the problem and opportunities for improving hospital emergency care. / Perfil de los pacientes ancianos atendidos en urgencias por caídas (Registro FALL-ER): magnitud del problema y posibilidades de mejora en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios.

OBJECTIVES: To profile patients aged 65 years or older who are attended in a hospital emergency department after falls. To describe the falls, their severity, and factors relevant to recommended preventive measures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The FALL-ER is a multipurpose, multicenter prospective registry of a systematically described cohort of patients aged 65 years or older attended in 5 hospital emergency departments on 52 days of the same year. We collected data on 68 independent variables. Patients were classified according to whether they had received recommendations related to preventing falls in any of the following categories: exercise, education on fall prevention, referral to a specialist or changes in medication. RESULTS: . A total of 1507 patients or carers were interviewed (93.6% of the 1610 patients in the registry). The cohort was of advanced age and had high rates of comorbidity, polypharmacy, and history of geriatric syndromes. The majority of falls occurred during the day and in the patients home. Half the falls were not witnessed. Forty-eight percent of the patients reported fear of falling, 22% had acute functional impairment, 16% were admitted, and 0.6% died in the hospital. Recommendations directed to preventing falls were received by 509 (33.8%) cases. Loss of hearing acuity, self-reported cognitive impairment, emergency first aid at the site of the fall, fear of falling again, acute functional impairment, and hospitalization were associated with a greater likelihood of receiving recommendations for preventing falls. Loss of visual acuity was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving recommendations. CONCLUSION: Only a third of elderly patients attended in an emergency department after falls receive recommendations that target preventing further falls. Certain patient and fall characteristics are associated with a greater likelihood of receiving such recommendations.

OBJETIVO: Estudiar el perfil de los pacientes de 65 años o más atendidos por una caída en los servicios de urgencias (SU), las características de las caídas, y el grado y los factores asociados con la realización de recomendaciones para prevenir las caídas (RPC). METODO: FALL-ER es un registro de cohortes multipropósito, prospectivo y multicéntrico, con muestreo sistemático, que incluyó todos los pacientes de 65 años o más atendidos por caída en 5 SU durante 52 días en un año. Se recogieron 68 variables independientes. Los pacientes se clasificaron en función de recibir o no RPC (cualquiera de las siguientes: ejercicio, educación sobre prevención de las caídas, derivación a especialista o modificación de fármacos relacionados con las caídas). RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 1.507 (93,6%) del total de 1.610 pacientes. Los pacientes tenían una edad muy avanzada y alto grado de comorbilidad, polifarmacia y síndromes geriátricos previos. La caída suele suceder de día, en domicilio y en la mitad de casos sin testigo. Un 48% refirió miedo a caerse, un 22% presentó deterioro funcional agudo, un 16% ingresó y un 0,6% falleció. Se realizaron RPC en 509 (33,8%) casos. La disminución de la agudeza auditiva, deterioro cognitivo autorreferido, atención médica en el lugar de la caída, miedo a volver a caerse, deterioro funcional agudo y hospitalización se asociaron con mayor probabilidad de RPC, y la disminución de la agudeza visual con menor probabilidad. CONCLUSIONES: Solo tres de cada diez pacientes ancianos atendidos por una caída en urgencias recibe RPC posteriores, aunque existen ciertas características relacionadas con el paciente y la caída que se asocian a una mayor probabilidad de recibirlas.

Characteristics and outcomes of older adults presented to Spanish emergency departments after a fall.

PURPOSE: To study patient profile, fall-related characteristics and immediate outcomes according to age and to determine the effect of age in the outcomes among older patients presenting to ED after a fall. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the FALL-ER registry that included patients aged ≥ 65 years old that presented to five Spanish EDs after a fall. Patients were classified into three age categories, and demographic, comorbidity, chronic medication, fall-related characteristics, health care resources and immediate outcomes data were analysed. RESULTS: We included 1610 patients, 541 (28%) aged 65-74, 647 (40.2%) aged 74-84 and 512 (31.8%) aged ≥ 85 years old. Indoor falls, with no witnesses, at night and due to non-identified causes were significantly more likely among the oldest old. Medications related to risk of falling and antithrombotic therapy significantly increased with age category. Physical, functional and psychological consequences and healthcare resource use increased significantly with age group. Age was independently associated with severe injury (adjusted OR 1.02; IC 95% 1.01-1.04), fear of falling (adjusted OR 1.02; IC 95% 1.01-1.04) and acute functional impairment (adjusted OR 1.02; IC 95% 1.00-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: Indoor falls, with no witnesses, at night and due to non-identified causes were significantly more likely among the oldest old. The probability of presenting with severe injury, fear of falling and acute functional impairment increases with age.

[Are treatments with statins that are considered unsuitable really unsuitable?]. / ¿Son realmente inadecuados los tratamientos con estatinas considerados como inadecuados?

In the Catalonian Institute of health there are 2 well-established circumstances for indicating lipid-lowering drug treatment with statins in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease. These are, severe hypercholesterolaemia, with a low density lipoprotein cholesterol equal to or greater than 240mg/dL, or above 130mg/dL when the coronary risk is equal to or greater than 10% at 10 years. There are data that suggest that these 2 criteria are not the only ones used in routine clinical practice, as such that the majority of patients to whom it is indicated, do not meet either of these 2 conditions. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the patients when statins are indicated outside the aforementioned circumstances. It is concluded that around 40% of patients have clinical characteristics that could justify the treatment. The level of suitability could not be established in about 33% of the patients, due to not being able to determine the coronary risk.

¿Son realmente inadecuados los tratamientos con estatinas considerados como inadecuados? / Are treatments with statins that are considered unsuitable really unsuitable?

Las circunstancias que están bien establecidas, en el ámbito del Institut Català de la Salut, para indicar un tratamiento farmacológico hipolipidemiante con estatinas en la prevención primaria de la cardiopatía isquémica son 2: una hipercolesterolemia severa, con valores de colesterol transportado por las lipoproteínas de baja densidad iguales o superiores a 240 mg/dL, o por encima de 130 mg/dL cuando el riesgo coronario es igual o mayor al 10% a los 10 años. Hay datos que indican que en la práctica habitual estos 2 criterios no son los únicos utilizados, de forma que la mayoría de los pacientes a quienes se indica, de novo, una estatina, no reúnen ninguna de estas 2 condiciones. Este estudio pretende conocer las características que tienen los pacientes cuando estas son indicadas fuera de los supuestos mencionados. Se concluye que cerca del 40% de los pacientes tienen características clínicas que pueden explicar la indicación del tratamiento. En una tercera parte no puede establecerse el grado de adecuación por no poderse determinar el riesgo coronario

In the Catalonian Institute of health there are 2 well-established circumstances for indicating lipid-lowering drug treatment with statins in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease. These are, severe hypercholesterolaemia, with a low density lipoprotein cholesterol equal to or greater than 240 mg/dL, or above 130 mg/dL when the coronary risk is equal to or greater than 10% at 10 years. There are data that suggest that these 2 criteria are not the only ones used in routine clinical practice, as such that the majority of patients to whom it is indicated, do not meet either of these 2 conditions. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the patients when statins are indicated outside the aforementioned circumstances. It is concluded that around 40% of patients have clinical characteristics that could justify the treatment. The level of suitability could not be established in about 33% of the patients, due to not being able to determine the coronary risk