Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 46(5): 275-284, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260370

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compared to those of open (ORP) and laparoscopic (LRP) surgery. The interest lies fundamentally in the quality-of-life (QoL) evaluation, postoperative recovery, and personal satisfaction of patients with the intervention (PS) beyond oncological and functional outcomes. METHODS: Six hundred eighty-five RPs were performed in our center between 2011-2018 (17,8% ORP, 22,2% LRP and 60% RARP). Patients were prospectively assessed through follow-up until April 2020 and a multiple questionnaire at 12-months post-RP that included ICIQ-SF, SHIM, IPSS, IQL and questions about pain, postoperative recovery and PS. Also baseline and postoperative patient- and treatment-related data were collected, and binomial logistic regressions were performed for the 1 vs.1 comparisons (ORP vs. RARP and LRP vs. RARP). RESULTS: RARP patients have overall fewer comorbidities, less tumor aggressiveness, more operative time requirements and more positive surgical margins than ORP and LRP patients. Nevertheless, RARP outperforms ORP in: hospital stay (days) (OR 0,86; 95% CI: 0,80-0,94), hemoglobin loss (OR 0,38; 95% CI: 0,30-0,47), transfusion rate (OR 0,18; 95% CI: 0,09-0,34), early complications (p = 0,001), IQL (OR 0,82; 95% CI: 0,69-0,98), erectile function (OR 0,41; 95% CI: 0,21-0,79), pain control (OR 0,82; 95% CI: 0,75-0,89), postoperative recovery (p < 0,001) and choice of a different approach (OR 5,55; 95% CI: 3,14-9,80). RARP is superior to LRP in: urinary continence (OR 0,55; 95% CI: 0,37-0,82), IPSS (OR 0,96; 95% CI: 0,93-0,98), IQL (OR 0,76; 95% CI: 0,66-0,88), erectile function (OR 0,52; 95% CI: 0,29-0,93), postoperative recovery (p = 0,02 and 0,004), PS (p = 0,005; 0,002; and 0,03) and choice of a different approach (OR 7,79; 95% CI: 4,63-13,13). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study globally endorse a positive effectiveness of RARP over ORP and/or LRP, both on functional issues, postoperative recovery, QoL and PS. Oncologic results should still be improved.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomia/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Actas urol. esp ; 43(9): 455-466, nov. 2019. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-185246

RESUMO

Introducción: Con el avance de la cirugía laparoscópica y robótica, la profilaxis tromboembólica en los procedimientos urológicos se han basado clásicamente en la experiencia de otras especialidades quirúrgicas. En este trabajo se realiza un análisis de la actualidad de las recomendaciones, basado en un estudio pormenorizado de las guías clínicas europeas y en la bibliografía, aplicando las recomendaciones de tromboprofilaxis a la práctica urológica diaria. Objetivos: Elaborar unas recomendaciones generales aplicables a los pacientes quirúrgicos en urología, evitando la aparición de eventos tromboembólicos en el periodo perioperatorio. Optimizar la medicación y el ajuste en pacientes crónicos y conocer qué pacientes son candidatos a terapias puente. Material y métodos: Se ha realizado una revisión de la literatura disponible y de las guías clínicas europeas. Se analizan los artículos de consenso más recientes realizando una revisión de la bibliografía disponible y los estudios y revisiones en los que se basan las guías europeas de tromboprofilaxis en urología. Resultados: La profilaxis tromboembólica se debe emplear en aquellas cirugías que requieran abordajes abdominales, encamamiento prolongado o enfermedades oncológicas. Las terapias puente con heparinas de bajo peso molecular deben ser reducidas. Los pacientes en tratamiento crónico se pueden beneficiar de terapias puente en casos concretos. Conclusiones: El empleo de heparinas, tan habitual en la práctica clínica, puede ser excesivo según las guías actuales. La aparición de nuevos fármacos anticoagulantes, los cuales poseen antagonistas directos, permiten la reducción de los tiempos de reintroducción de la medicación crónica y un control más eficaz del sangrado


Introduction: With the advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery, thromboembolic prophylaxis in urologic procedures has traditionally been based on the experience of other surgical specialties. This paper aims to analyze the current recommendations, through a detailed study of the European clinical guidelines and bibliography, applying the recommendations of thromboprophylaxis to the daily urological practice. Objectives: To elaborate general recommendations to surgical patients in Urology, avoiding the risk of perioperative thromboembolic events. Optimize medication in chronic patients and accurately classify who are eligible for bridge therapy. Material and methods: A review of the available literature and the European clinical guidelines was carried out. We analyzed the most recent consensus articles by studying the available bibliography, trials and reviews on which the European guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in urology are based. Results: Thromboembolic prophylaxis should be targeted towards surgeries that require abdominal approaches, prolonged bed rest or oncological pathologies. Bridge therapies with low molecular weight heparins should be limited. Patients undergoing treatment for chronic conditions can benefit from bridge therapies in specific cases


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia/cirurgia , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Período Perioperatório , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia
3.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 43(9): 455-466, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31351747

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: With the advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery, thromboembolic prophylaxis in urologic procedures has traditionally been based on the experience of other surgical specialties. This paper aims to analyze the current recommendations, through a detailed study of the European clinical guidelines and bibliography, applying the recommendations of thromboprophylaxis to the daily urological practice. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate general recommendations to surgical patients in Urology, avoiding the risk of perioperative thromboembolic events. Optimize medication in chronic patients and accurately classify who are eligible for bridge therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of the available literature and the European clinical guidelines was carried out. We analyzed the most recent consensus articles by studying the available bibliography, trials and reviews on which the European guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in urology are based. RESULTS: Thromboembolic prophylaxis should be targeted towards surgeries that require abdominal approaches, prolonged bed rest or oncological pathologies. Bridge therapies with low molecular weight heparins should be limited. Patients undergoing treatment for chronic conditions can benefit from bridge therapies in specific cases. CONCLUSIONS: According to the current guidelines, there might be an overuse of heparins in the daily clinical practice. The development of -direct oral- anticoagulants have shown to reduce the time to reintroduction of medication for chronic conditions as well as a more effective bleeding management.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
4.
Hipertens. riesgo vasc ; 35(1): 37-40, ene.-mar. 2018. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-170715

RESUMO

La hipertensión arterial supone un importante problema de salud pública en los países desarrollados. Las masas suprarrenales pueden pasar desapercibidas, ya que no son lesiones frecuentes y no producen síntomas o no se les atribuyen directamente. Estas circunstancias hacen que sea fundamental la actuación médica multidisciplinar. Comunicamos el caso de una mujer de 72 años, hipertensa mal controlada de años de evolución (3 fármacos antihipertensivos, sin alcanzar la tensión arterial en rango de normalidad), remitida por hallazgo incidental de lesión retroperitoneal derecha. Se diagnostica de quiste de origen suprarrenal posiblemente responsable del cuadro hipertensivo. Realizamos revisión de la literatura analizando diferentes actitudes diagnósticas y terapéuticas. Tras adrenalectomía por abordaje laparoscópico, conseguimos estabilizar a la paciente en cifras de tensión arterial dentro de la normalidad. La integración coordinada de servicios médicos y quirúrgicos es clave para el manejo de situaciones clínicas poco frecuentes. La cirugía laparoscópica constituye el tratamiento de elección en la enfermedad retroperitoneal (AU)


Hypertension is a prevalent disease in developed countries. Adrenal masses, and especially adrenal cysts, are a rare and usually asymptomatic finding, which can go unnoticed or be detected as incidental findings in imaging tests. These circumstances make the multidisciplinary approach mandatory. The case is presented on a 72 year-old woman with uncontrolled high blood pressure referred to the Urology Department due to the incidental finding of a right retroperitoneal mass. A functional and imaging study was performed, establishing a diagnosis of adrenal cyst causing hypertensive symptoms. A literature search was performed in order to assess diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. With the diagnosis of adrenal cyst causing uncontrolled high blood pressure, a right laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed. After surgery the patient has maintained blood pressure within the normal range. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the management of rare diseases. The surgical approach, if possible, should be laparoscopic (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Hipertensão/diagnóstico por imagem , Hipertensão/prevenção & controle , Hipotensão Controlada , Neoplasias do Córtex Suprarrenal/secundário , Córtex Suprarrenal/irrigação sanguínea , Laparoscopia/métodos , Córtex Suprarrenal/anatomia & histologia , Córtex Suprarrenal/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico por imagem , Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico por imagem
5.
Hipertens Riesgo Vasc ; 35(1): 37-40, 2018.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29157938

RESUMO

Hypertension is a prevalent disease in developed countries. Adrenal masses, and especially adrenal cysts, are a rare and usually asymptomatic finding, which can go unnoticed or be detected as incidental findings in imaging tests. These circumstances make the multidisciplinary approach mandatory. The case is presented on a 72 year-old woman with uncontrolled high blood pressure referred to the Urology Department due to the incidental finding of a right retroperitoneal mass. A functional and imaging study was performed, establishing a diagnosis of adrenal cyst causing hypertensive symptoms. A literature search was performed in order to assess diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. With the diagnosis of adrenal cyst causing uncontrolled high blood pressure, a right laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed. After surgery the patient has maintained blood pressure within the normal range. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the management of rare diseases. The surgical approach, if possible, should be laparoscopic.


Assuntos
Doenças das Glândulas Suprarrenais/complicações , Cistos/complicações , Hipertensão/etiologia , Doenças das Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças das Glândulas Suprarrenais/fisiopatologia , Doenças das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Adrenalectomia , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Cistos/irrigação sanguínea , Cistos/diagnóstico por imagem , Cistos/fisiopatologia , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Laparoscopia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
6.
Andrology ; 4(4): 626-31, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27153294

RESUMO

The distance from the genitals to the anus, anogenital distance, reflects androgen concentration during prenatal development in mammals. The use of anogenital distance in human studies is still very limited and the quality and consistency of measurements is an important methodological issue. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of adult male anogenital distance measurements by two different methods. All men were attending an outpatient clinic at a university hospital and underwent an andrological examination and completed a brief questionnaire. Two variants of anogenital distance [from the anus to the posterior base of the scrotum (AGDAS ) and to the cephalad insertion of the penis (AGDAP )] by two methods (lithotomy or frog-legged position) were assessed in 70 men. Within and between coefficient of variations, intra-class correlation coefficients, two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, and scatter and Bland-Altman plots were calculated. The two methods produced similar values for AGDAP but different estimates for AGDAS . Nonetheless, the overall agreement (ICC ≥ 0.80) was acceptable for both measures. Therefore, both methods are internally consistent and adequate for epidemiological studies, and may be used depending on the available medical resources, clinical setting, and populations.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/anatomia & histologia , Antropometria/métodos , Períneo/anatomia & histologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness ; 55(11): 1371-5, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25303168

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this paper was to highlight the special frequency of cases of rhabdomyolysis related to the practice of indoor cycling and to define the characteristics, course, and outcome of this disease. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical histories of patients diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis after indoor cycling in our unit from January 2012 to April 2013. RESULTS: Eleven patients were analyzed. All patients, regardless of the degree of previous physical training, were diagnosed after a first session of indoor cycling. Mean age was 27.63 years (SD=5.74). Fifty-four percent were women. Creatine kinase (CK) levels gradually decreased in response to rest and intensive intravenous hydration. Only in two cases was renal failure observed, and in none were electrolyte disorders, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) or compartmental syndrome detected. CONCLUSION: A first session of indoor cycling has become a common cause of rhabdomyolysis secondary to the physical exercise in recent years, which should alert those responsible for teaching this sport of the need for a gradual start under adequate hydration and environmental conditions, because although the condition has a benign course with adequate treatment and the complication rate is low, there are patients with increased susceptibility to very high CK blood levels requiring hospitalization for treatment and follow-up of possible complications.


Assuntos
Creatina Quinase/sangue , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Rabdomiólise/reabilitação , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rabdomiólise/sangue , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...