Passive leg raising test using the carotid flow velocity-time integral to predict fluid responsiveness.

PURPOSE: The passive leg raising test (PLR) is a noninvasive method widely adopted to assess fluid responsiveness. We propose to explore if changes in the carotid flow assessed by echo-Doppler can predict fluid responsiveness after a PLR. METHODS: We conducted a performance diagnostic study in two intensive care units from Argentina between February and April 2022. We included patients with signs of tissular hypoperfusion that required fluid resuscitation. We labeled the patients as fluid responders when we measured, after a fluid bolus, an increase greater than 15% in the left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) VTI in an apical 5-chamber view and we compared those results with the carotid flow (CF) velocity-time integral (VTI) from the left supraclavicular region in a semi-recumbent position and during the PLR. RESULTS: Of the 62 eligible patients, 50 patients (80.6%) were included. The area under the ROC curve for a change in CF VTI during the PLR test was 0.869 (95% CI 0.743-0.947). An increase of at least of 11% in the CF VTI with the PLR predicted fluid-responsiveness with a sensitivity of 77.3% (95% CI 54.6-92.2%) and specificity of 78.6% (95% CI 59-91.7%). The positive predictive value was 73.9% (95% CI 57.4-85.6%) and the negative predictive value was 81.5% (95% CI 66.5-90.7%). The positive likelihood ratio was 3.61 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.29. CONCLUSION: An increase greater than 11% in CF VTI after a PLR may be useful to predict fluid responsiveness among critically ill patients.

Carotid flow as a surrogate of the left ventricular stroke volume.

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a fundamental tool for hemodynamic monitoring in critical patients. It allows evaluating the left ventricle's stroke volume based on the measurement of the velocity-time integral (VTI) of the left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT). However, in the intensive care unit obtaining adequate echocardiographic views may present a challenge. We propose to measure, as a surrogate of the stroke volume, the carotid flow with a novel technique. This is an observational, prospective, and simple blind study, conducted in the intensive care unit of Sanatorio de los Arcos and Hospital Aleman, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We measured the carotid systodiastolic flow (CSD) VTI and the carotid systolic flow (CS) VTI at the level of the left supraclavicular fossa and we compared it with the LVOT VTI obtained by TTE. We evaluated 43 subjects. Spearman's correlation coefficient between LVOT VTI and CS VTI was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.89) and between LVOT VTI and CSD VTI was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.94). The Bland-Altman method analysis of the 5-chamber apical window LVOT VTI compared to the CSD VTI showed a bias of - 0.2 (95% CI - 0.82 to 0.43), with a concordance interval between - 4.2 (95% CI - 5.2 to - 3.1) and 3.8 cm (95% CI 2.7 to 4.9). The percentage error was 37.9%. Almost 100% of the values fell within the concordance limits, and no trend was observed in bias across the spectrum of mean variables. Although the CSD VTI could not be interchangeable with the LVOT VTI, it could be considered as its surrogate.