Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Epidemiol ; 10(7): 479, 2000 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11018424

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study assessed the feasibility of three laboratory methods for the detection of atrazine, a triazine herbicide, and its related metabolites in urine collected from field applicators.METHODS: Urine samples were collected from 256 randomly sampled field applicators 8 hours post application. Of these, 99 reported atrazine use during the application prior to sample collection and these samples were subsequently analyzed for urinary biomarkers.RESULTS: 37.4% (n = 37) samples showed detectable levels (minimum = 1.0 ng/mL) of deethylatrazine using gas chromatographic mass spectrometry (GCMS) analysis (X = 14.2 ng/mL; s.d. = 13.5). Fifty samples were tested using atrazine mercapturate in urine ELISA methods and 80% (n = 40) of these samples showed detectable levels of atrazine (X = 6.4 ng/mL; s.d. = 7.5). Of 10 samples tested by triazines in water ELISA methods, a common assay used for the detection of atrazine in groundwater, 100% showed detectable levels of atrazine (X = 22.4 ng/mL; s.d. = 13.9). Of the 21 samples collected from non-applicators and tested by GCMS, none evidenced detectable atrazine levels. Using GCMS as the gold standard, analyses showed that the mercapturate in urine ELISA was 48% sensitive and 91% specific whereas the triazines in water ELISA was 69% sensitive and 100% specific.CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to detect one-time atrazine exposures through analysis of urinary biomarkers among pesticide applicators. The feasibility of triazines in water ELISA methods for use in field studies for analyzing the presence of atrazine and related metabolites in urine was supported, but these methods need further testing on larger applicator samples before they can be used for standard screening.

2.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 16(7-8): 285-90, 2000 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11693946

RESUMO

This study compared three relatively common laboratory methods for the detection of atrazine (a triazine herbicide commonly used in US agriculture), and related metabolites in urine. Ninety-nine samples collected from atrazine applicators within 8 h post application were analyzed. Thirty-seven percent of applicators showed detectable levels (minimum = 1.0 ng/ml) of deethylatrazine (an atrazine metabolite typically found in environmental samples) in their urine, based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis (mean = 14.2 ng/ml). Fifty applicator samples were tested using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) designed for the mercapturate metabolic product. Most of these samples (80%) had detectable levels of the mercapturate product. A triazine in water ELISA was also used to test several diluted urine samples from atrazine applicators, and all samples were positive for triazines. Mediocre agreements between the three methods indicated that each detected distinct atrazine exposure products. The results indicate that single field applications of atrazine result in measurable pesticide doses to applicators and that the choice of field assay should depend on the exposure product to be evaluated.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Agroquímicos/análise , Atrazina/urina , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Herbicidas/urina , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/normas , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/normas , Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas/normas , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...