Periodontal Disease May be Associated With the Occurrence of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Subgroup Analysis of The Survey of the Diabetes Coordination Notebook in Gifu.

AIMS: A questionnaire survey of the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was recently conducted in Japan. A subgroup analysis to examine the association of periodontal disease with diabetic retinopathy in subjects with diabetes and prediabetes was conducted. METHODS: The association of the presence of periodontal disease with the occurrence of diabetic retinopathy was examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 27 016 subjects who completed a survey at 217 community pharmacies, 5 572 had diabetes or prediabetes, among whom 522 and 1 421 had retinopathy or periodontal disease, respectively. Therapy duration≥10 years (OR: 2.73, 95% CI: 2.17-3.43, P<0.001), periodontal disease (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.68-2.62, P<0.001) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7.0% (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.32-2.04, P<0.001) were significantly associated with the occurrence of retinopathy, while retinopathy (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.: 69-2.63, P<0.001) and therapy duration ≥10 years (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.46, P=0.007) were significantly associated with the occurrence of periodontal disease. The prevalence of retinopathy was much higher in diabetic subjects with periodontal disease than in those without it (15.1% vs. 7.8%, P<0.001). Notably, the difference of prevalence of retinopathy between subjects with and without periodontal disease was statistically significant even at HbA1c 6.0-6.9% (15.2% vs. 7.3%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the target HbA1c level for diabetes patients with periodontal disease may be set lower than for those without it, and that regular dental visits should be prescribed for the management of periodontal disease and the prevention of diabetic retinopathy.

Evaluation of the Diabetes Regional Coordination Path using the Diabetes Coordination Notebook in community-based diabetes care.

AIMS: A number of epidemiologic surveys have demonstrated that improving lifestyle habits, providing patient education, and regular screening of patients for early diabetic symptoms and complications through multidisciplinary collaboration are crucial for the management of diabetes. METHODS: To evaluate the Diabetes Coordination Notebook and the Diabetes Regional Coordination Path in management of diabetes, 217 community pharmacies conducted a survey by questionnaire in Gifu Prefecture, Japan. RESULTS: A reply to the questionnaire was obtained from 27,016 individuals, of whom 5,572 claimed to have diabetes or prediabetes. The rate of usage of the Diabetes Coordination Notebook and the Diabetes Regional Coordination Path was 40% and 7%, respectively. Interestingly, patients using the Diabetes Regional Coordination Path more frequently visited an ophthalmic clinic (p < 0.001) and a dental clinic (p < 0.05) than those not using it. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that use of the Diabetes Regional Coordination Path was the only factor associated with control of HbA1c < 7.0% (OR: 0.613, 95% CI: 0.395-0.951, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The usage of the Diabetes Regional Coordination Path together with the Diabetes Coordination Notebook is associated not only with regular visits to both an ophthalmic clinic and a dental clinic but also with the maintenance of appropriate HbA1c.