Pharmacokinetic study of saxagliptin in healthy Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetics of some medications may be affected by differences in race and ethnicity, which can lead to suboptimal outcomes. The present study was conducted to assess the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of saxagliptin in healthy Chinese subjects living in China. METHODS: This was an open-label, 9-day study conducted at the Drug Clinical Trial Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. Sixteen healthy Chinese subjects of both sexes between 21 and 33 years of age were administered saxagliptin 5 mg orally on day 1, then once daily on days 3-7. Pharmacokinetic variables for saxagliptin (primary outcome) and its active metabolite, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin (secondary outcome), after single and multiple oral doses of saxagliptin were assessed. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Saxagliptin was absorbed rapidly (median time to reach maximum concentration [t(max)]: 0.5 and 1 hour on days 1 and 7, respectively), and its pharmacologically active metabolite, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin, appeared in plasma (median t(max): 1.0 and 1.5 hours, respectively). Plasma exposure to 5-hydroxy saxagliptin was approximately 2- to 3-fold higher than exposure to saxagliptin. Plasma concentration-time profiles for saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin were similar on days 1 and 7, with no evidence of drug accumulation on repeated dosing. The elimination half-lives (t(½)) for saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin were approximately 3 and 4 hours, respectively, with renal excretion as the primary route of elimination. After single and multiple dosing, 54.48% and 52.60%, respectively, of the administered saxagliptin dose was recovered in urine as unchanged drug or 5-hydroxy saxagliptin. Saxagliptin was generally well tolerated. Six (37.5%) subjects experienced an adverse event (AE). All AEs were mild in intensity and judged by the investigator as not related to the study medication. There were no deaths, serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, or other clinically significant AEs during this study. CONCLUSION: Saxagliptin 5 mg (single dose and once-daily doses for 5 days) was generally well tolerated; the pharmacokinetics of saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin in healthy Chinese subjects were consistent with previous assessments in the saxagliptin clinical development program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00770302.

Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in drug-naïve Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the use of new oral anti-diabetic agents in Asian populations. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin versus placebo in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-eight drug-naïve adult patients with T2DM and glycated haemoglobin levels (HbA(1c)) of 7.0-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive saxagliptin 5 mg daily or placebo. Efficacy endpoints included changes from baseline to week 24 in HbA(1c) , fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial glucose area under the curve from 0 to 180 min (PPG AUC(0-180)), and the proportion of patients achieving HbA(1c) <7.0% (53 mmol/mol). Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were evaluated. RESULTS: Saxagliptin provided statistically significant adjusted mean decreases from baseline to week 24 compared with placebo, respectively, in HbA(1c) (-0.84% [-9 mmol/mol] versus -0.34% [-4 mmol/mol]; p < 0.0001), FPG (-0.90 versus -0.17 mmol/L; p < 0.0001), and PPG AUC(0-180) (-417 versus -235 mmol · min/L; p = 0.0010). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved a therapeutic glycaemic response (HbA(1c) <7.0% [53 mmol/mol]) with saxagliptin (45.8%) versus placebo (28.8%; p < 0.0001). The proportions of patients who experienced ≥1 AE (excluding hypoglycaemia) was 43.3% for saxagliptin and 35.6% for placebo. Few patients in either treatment group experienced an SAE (2.8%, saxagliptin; 1.4%, placebo). A low proportion of patients reported hypoglycaemic events (1.8%, saxagliptin; 0.7%, placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin improved glycaemic control and was well tolerated in drug-naïve Asian patients with T2DM.

Evaluation of the effect of dapagliflozin on cardiac repolarization: a thorough QT/QTc study.

INTRODUCTION: Dapagliflozin is a first-in-class sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A thorough QTc study was conducted, according to International Conference on Harmonization E14 guidelines, to characterize the effect of dapagliflozin on cardiac repolarization. METHODS: The present study was a double-blind, four-period, placebo-controlled crossover study at a single-center inpatient clinical pharmacology unit. The study enrolled 50 healthy men who were randomized to receive sequences of single doses of dapagliflozin 150 mg, dapagliflozin 20 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg, and placebo. The sequences were randomized based on the Williams design for a cross-over study to reduce the "carryover" effects from drug-to-drug even with sufficient washout periods. Digital 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded at nine time points over 24 hours in each period. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using a study-specific correction factor (QTcX) and Fridericia's formula. RESULTS: For dapagliflozin, the upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for time-matched, placebo-subtracted, baseline adjusted QTc intervals (ΔΔQTc) was <10 ms. ΔΔQTc was independent of dapagliflozin concentrations. No QTc thresholds >450 ms or QTc increases >30 ms were observed. Moxifloxacin increased the mean QTcX interval by 7.7 ms (lower bound 90% CI, 6.2 ms) over 1-4 hours after dosing, confirming assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin, at supratherapeutic doses, does not have a clinically significant effect on the QT interval in healthy subjects.

Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin added to metformin in Asian people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To assess efficacy and safety of saxagliptin added to metformin versus placebo plus metformin in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and inadequate glycemic control on metformin alone. METHODS: Adults (HbA(1c) 7.0-10.0%, on stable metformin ≥ 1500 mg/day) were randomized 1:1 to saxagliptin 5mg daily plus metformin (n = 283) or placebo plus metformin (n = 287). The primary end point was HbA(1c) change from baseline to Week 24. RESULTS: Saxagliptin plus metformin provided significant adjusted mean decreases versus placebo plus metformin (p ≤ 0.0052) in HbA(1c) (-0.78% versus -0.37%), fasting plasma glucose (-1.14 mmol/L versus -0.58 mmol/L), and postprandial glucose area under the curve from 0 to 180 min (-315 mmol min/L versus -160 mmol min/L). Significantly more saxagliptin-treated patients achieved a therapeutic glycemic response (HbA(1c)<7.0%) (46.5% versus 30.5%; p = 0.0001). The proportion of patients experiencing adverse events (excluding hypoglycemia) was similar for saxagliptin plus metformin (42.8%) versus placebo plus metformin (40.8%). Hypoglycemic events were reported in 1.4% of patients in each group. CONCLUSION: Saxagliptin added to metformin significantly improved glycemic control and was well tolerated in Asian patients with T2DM who had inadequate glycemic control with metformin and diet and lifestyle modification.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of tesaglitazar when added to the therapeutic regimen of poorly controlled insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study assessed the effects of addition of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha/gamma agonist, tesaglitazar, for 24 weeks to the therapeutic regimen of 392 poorly controlled (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1C] 7.5-10%) insulin-treated, type 2 diabetes patients. At 24 weeks, tesaglitazar 0.5 mg resulted in a 0.66% (95% confidence intervals: -0.85, -0.47; p<0.0001) reduction from baseline in HbA1C, and reduced fasting plasma glucose (p<0.0001) and daily insulin dose (p=0.014) versus placebo. After 24 weeks, tesaglitazar caused greater improvements from baseline in triglycerides (p<0.0001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (p<0.001), non-HDL-C (p<0.05), apolipoprotein (apo)A-I (p<0.05) and apoB levels (p<0.01) than placebo. Tesaglitazar was generally well tolerated but was associated with a greater increase in serum creatinine level than placebo. The clinical development of tesaglitazar is no longer continuing; its effects on the glucose and lipid abnormalities of type 2 diabetes suggest that the concept of dual PPARalpha/gamma agonism is worthy of further investigation.

Effect of tesaglitazar, a dual PPAR alpha/gamma agonist, on glucose and lipid abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 12-week dose-ranging trial.

OBJECTIVE: The Glucose and Lipid Assessment in Diabetes (GLAD) trial examined the dose-response relationship of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha/gamma agonist tesaglitazar in type 2 diabetic patients. STUDY DESIGN: GLAD was a 12-week, multicenter, international, randomized, parallel-group trial. Five-hundred men and women aged 30-80 years with type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] > or = 126 mg/dL [> or = 7.0 mmol/L]) received once-daily, double-blind placebo or tesaglitazar (0.1 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.0 mg, or 3.0 mg) or open-label pioglitazone (45 mg), included as a therapeutic benchmark. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Placebo-corrected changes from baseline in FPG (primary end point), plasma lipids, and insulin-resistance measures. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean patient age was 56.1 years, 57.5 years, and 58.9 years for placebo, across tesaglitazar groups, and for pioglitazone, respectively. For the corresponding groups, mean body mass index was 30.6 kg/m2, 30.9 kg/m2, and 29.7 kg/m2, and mean HbA1c was 7.0%, 7.2%, and 7.0%, respectively. At 12 weeks, tesaglitazar 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.0 mg, and 3.0 mg produced statistically significant reductions in FPG (-30.3 mg/dL, -41.1 mg/dL, -55.0 mg/dL, -60.9 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), triglycerides (-17.2%, -32.9%, -41.0%, -40.9%; p < 0.01), and apolipoprotein B (-15.0%, -15.7%, -21.0%, -22.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Tesaglitazar at doses > or = 1.0 mg significantly increased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (15.0%, 13.0%, 12.9%; p < 0.001), and reduced non-HDL-C (-13.2%, -22.2%, -25.0%; p < 0.0001), very-low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C) (-36.9%, -49.8%, -52.5%; p < 0.0001), and total cholesterol (-6.8%, -14.1%, -15.5%, respectively; p < 0.01). Tesaglitazar > or = 0.5 mg improved insulin-resistance measures. Although no formal statistical analyses were performed between active treatments, improvements in efficacy measures with tesaglitazar 1.0 mg were numerically similar to or greater than those with pioglitazone. Similar numbers of adverse events occurred in the tesaglitazar < or = 1.0 mg, placebo, and pioglitazone arms, but there was an increasing frequency of discontinuations due to pre-specified hematologic and clinical-chemistry criteria with tesaglitazar doses > or = 1.0 mg. CONCLUSIONS: In type 2 diabetic patients, tesaglitazar dose-dependently reduced FPG levels at doses > or = 0.5 mg. Other markers of glycemic control, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and measures associated with insulin resistance were improved at doses > or = 0.5 mg or > or = 1.0 mg. Study limitations included that the majority of patients were white, patients had good glycemic control at baseline, and the increased number of early withdrawals in the tesaglitazar 2.0 mg and 3.0 mg doses limits conclusions about the efficacy of these doses. The 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg tesaglitazar doses were identified for further investigation.

Antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan-lisinopril in combination vs. up-titration of lisinopril: the AMAZE trials.

The AMAZE (A Multicenter Trial Using Atacand and Zestril vs. Zestril to Evaluate the Effects on Lowering Blood Pressure) program included two identical studies sponsored by AstraZeneca LP. The oral form of candesartan is candesartan cilexetil; for simplicity, the term "candesartan" is used throughout this manuscript. Two identical multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies were performed to determine if addition of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan was more effective in lowering blood pressure than up-titration of lisinopril. Hypertensive patients (N=1,096) who were uncontrolled on lisinopril 20 mg daily were randomized (1:1) to receive either 8 weeks of high-dose lisinopril (40 mg) or the addition of candesartan (16 mg) for 2 weeks followed by 32 mg for 6 weeks. Study 1 (n=538) demonstrated decreases in trough sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressures at Week 8 by 6.2/5.9 mm Hg, respectively, for the lisinopril up-titration treatment group and by 11.6/8.3 mm Hg, respectively, for the lisinopril plus candesartan treatment group (p<0.01 in comparing both blood pressures reductions between the two treatment groups). Corresponding results for Study 2 (n=558) are reductions of 8.7/6.2 mm Hg and 9.5/7.4 mm Hg, respectively, for each of the two treatment groups. For Study 2, comparisons of systolic/diastolic blood pressures between the two treatment groups were not statistically significantly different (p=0.51/p=0.08, respectively). Post hoc pooled analysis (N=1,096) demonstrated a slightly greater blood pressure reduction with lisinopril plus candesartan compared with lisinopril (3.1/1.7 mm Hg). A 95% confidence interval limit for the difference in least squares mean change from baseline in systolic blood pressure between the two treatment groups is -4.8 to -1.5 and is -2.8 to -0.7 in mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. The blood pressure control rates (<140/<90 mm Hg) were 42.7% and 36.9%, respectively. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated in all groups. In conclusion, for hypertensive patients not controlled by lisinopril 20 mg once daily, addition of candesartan (32 mg once daily) or doubling the dose of lisinopril provides safe, additional reduction of blood pressure.

Clinical trial of extended-release felodipine in pediatric essential hypertension.

Essential hypertension in pediatric patients may require pharmacological treatment. There is a need for efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated antihypertensive agents with a once-a-day dosing regimen in children and adolescents. The aim of the trial was to evaluate the dose-response and tolerability of the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, felodipine extended-release tablets (felodipine ER), given once daily to pediatric patients with essential hypertension. A randomized double-blind, parallel-group, multi-center clinical study comparing felodipine ER (2.5, 5, or 10 mg once daily) and placebo was performed on pediatric patients with a baseline systolic (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) above the 95th percentile for age, sex, and height. Of 133 randomized patients, 128 (96.2%) completed the 3 weeks of double-blind treatment. The study population included 50% children 6-12 years of age or Tanner stage