Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Nephrol ; 21(1): 273, 2020 07 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32664890

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Renal infarction (RI) is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Appropriate secondary prevention treatment is essential and requires an exhaustive etiological assessment. We aimed to determine whether invasive endovascular explorations may improve the diagnostic process and change the secondary prevention treatment strategy in RI patients. METHODS: We report a retrospective observational study of 25 RI patients referred to Tours University Hospital between 2011 and 2018 for etiological investigation including renal arteriography and intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS). We sought for antithrombotic treatment regimen, vital status, bleeding and ischemic outcomes during the median follow-up of 59 months. RESULTS: Invasive explorations showed local arterial disease in 14 patients (56%). This led to a diagnosis or change in diagnosis in 9 patients (36%) and to a change in antithrombotic strategy in 56% of cases, with an increased prescription of antiplatelet therapy. No patient died, only two patients (8%) had persistent mild renal insufficiency. One IVUS complication was reported and treated without any significant long-term consequences. CONCLUSION: Invasive endovascular investigations of RI may modify the secondary prevention treatment through a better assessment of the aetiology of RI. Multicentric randomized studies are necessary to advocate the hypothesis that invasive exploration of renal artery can improve long-term prognosis.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Aterosclerose/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto/tratamento farmacológico , Nefropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Angiografia/métodos , Aterosclerose/complicações , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Embolia/complicações , Embolia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Infarto/etiologia , Nefropatias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/complicações , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/tratamento farmacológico , Prevenção Secundária , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
2.
J Hypertens ; 34(6): 1123-31, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26999754

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite adequate glycemic and blood pressure control, diabetic hypertensives remain at increased cardiovascular risk. Aortic stiffness and pulse pressure (PP) amplification may provide complementary information to correct cardiovascular risk. We aim to determine whether these hemodynamic parameters are interrelated or not and to explore the factors related to pressure pulsatility. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 351 patients, involving controls, hypertensives without diabetes and diabetic patients with or without hypertension. Hemodynamic parameters were determined by applanation tonometry. Multivariate regression analyses evaluated the interest of therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: Aortic stiffness and PP amplification were not interrelated (P = 0.32) in multivariate-adjusted analysis and were both independently associated with previous cardiovascular events. Although disproportionately increased aortic stiffness in diabetic hypertensives (P < 0.001), no difference was found for PP amplification. The present dissociation between these two hemodynamic parameters may be related to the effect of increased heart rate (P < 0.001) in the presence of diabetes, in men and women. In diabetic hypertensives, aortic stiffness was correlated with glycated hemoglobin level (P = 0.04), but not with blood pressure or heart rate. Antihypertensive and statin treatments were correlated with PP amplification but not with aortic stiffness. CONCLUSION: Aortic stiffness and PP amplification were not interrelated, suggesting that these markers may provide complementary information for cardiovascular risk. New therapeutic strategies targeting pressure pulsatility should take into account the impact of hyperglycemia and increased heart rate in diabetic hypertensives. Gender influence on the role of autonomic nervous system in attenuating pressure wave reflections remains to be further established.


Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea , Diabetes Mellitus/fisiopatologia , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Rigidez Vascular , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Glicemia/metabolismo , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Fatores de Risco
3.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 108(1): 39-49, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25453717

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infarct size (IS) is a major determinant of patient outcome after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Interventions aimed at reducing reperfusion injury, such as cardiac ischaemic postconditioning (IPost), may reduce IS and improve clinical outcomes. IPost has been shown to be feasible in patients with STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). AIMS: To provide an updated summary of the efficacy of IPost, assessed by analysing accurate surrogate markers of IS. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of IPost in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. The main outcome was area under the curve of serum creatine kinase release (CK-AUC). Secondary outcomes were other surrogate biomarkers of IS, complete ST-segment resolution, direct measurement of IS by single-photon emission computed tomography and estimation of IS by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR-IS). RESULTS: Eleven studies were retrieved, including 1313 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI with or without IPost. Compared with controls, we observed a significant reduction in CK-AUC (standard mean difference [SMD] -2.84 IU/L, 95% CI -5.43 to -0.25 IU/L; P=0.03). Other surrogate markers, such as CMR-IS (SMD -0.36, 95% CI -0.88 to 0.15; P=0.16), showed a non-significant IS reduction in the IPost group. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis, dealing with accurate surrogate markers of IS, suggests that IPost reduces IS. However, results should be interpreted cautiously because of limited sample sizes and significant heterogeneity. Whether this translates into improvements in cardiac function and patient prognosis still needs to be demonstrated in larger prospective randomized controlled studies that are powered sufficiently.


Assuntos
Pós-Condicionamento Isquêmico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/prevenção & controle , Biomarcadores/sangue , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Creatina Quinase/sangue , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Miocárdio/patologia , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/sangue , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/diagnóstico , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...