RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Explore how adults from diverse racial and socioeconomic backgrounds perceive the use of weight loss drugs (prescription, over-the counter, herbals and supplements) and lifestyle modification. METHODS: Individual, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with persons presenting to an academic hospital-affiliated outpatient pharmacy serving ethnic minorities and low income individuals. RESULTS: Fifty persons were interviewed, including 21 African Americans, 11 Hispanics and 17 low-income individuals (annual income <$20,000), of whom 33 self-reported as overweight or obese. Ever-users (14/50) and nonusers (36/50) of weight loss drugs expressed a belief in the importance of diet and exercise, but were not necessarily doing so themselves. Fear of side effects and skepticism towards efficacy of drugs deterred use. Some expressed concern over herbal product safety; others perceived herbals as natural and safe. Drugs were often viewed as a short-cut and not a long-term weight management solution. CONCLUSION: A range of concerns related to the safety and efficacy of weight loss drugs were expressed by this lower income, ethnically diverse population of underweight to obese adults. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: There is need and opportunity for healthcare providers to provide weight loss advice and accurate information regarding the safety and efficacy of various types of weight loss approaches.
Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade/administração & dosagem , Terapia Comportamental , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Suplementos Nutricionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Exercício Físico , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Estilo de Vida , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Dieta , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/etnologia , Obesidade/psicologia , Sobrepeso , Percepção , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Redução de PesoRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of fosphenytoin compared with phenytoin for treating patients admitted to an emergency department following a seizure. DESIGN: Cost-minimization analysis performed from a hospital perspective. SETTING: Hospital emergency department. PATIENTS: Two hundred fifty-six patients participating in a comparative clinical trial. INTERVENTION: Estimation of adverse event rates and resource use. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In our base case, phenytoin was the preferred option, with an expected total treatment cost of $5.39 compared with $110.14 for fosphenytoin. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the frequency and cost of treating purple glove syndrome (PGS) possibly could affect the decision. Monte Carlo simulation showed phenytoin to be the preferred option 97.3% of the time. CONCLUSION: When variable costs of care are used to calculate the value of phenytoin compared with fosphenytoin in the emergency department, phenytoin is preferred. The decision to administer phenytoin was very robust and changed only when both the frequency and cost of PGS was high.