Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Ophthalmol ; 2022: 8210599, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35957743

RESUMO

Purpose: Evaluate the relationship between retinal vascular caliber and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) severity or progression. Methods: A retrospective secondary analysis of 1172 fundus photographs and clinical data from the prospective Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). Central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE), central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE), and arteriole-to-venule ratio (AVR) were measured using the Parr-Hubbard-Knudtson formula. Univariate and multivariate regressions were used to determine the association of CRAE, CRVE, and AVR with age, sex, smoking status, presence of cilioretinal artery, and AMD severity at baseline and 5 years using the 9-step AMD severity score. Results: Only CRAE and CRVE were higher in men (P < 0.001), current smokers (P < 0.001), and the eyes with a cilioretinal artery (P=0.009 - 0.043). AMD severity was greater in older patients (P=0.001), current smokers (P=0.012), the eyes without a cilioretinal artery (P=0.001), and lower AVR (P=0.034) on multivariate regression but was not influenced by CRAE or CRVE (P=0.240 - 0.500). Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) presence was associated with older age (P=0.003) and absence of a cilioretinal artery (P=0.009), while central geographic atrophy (CGA) was associated with narrower CRAE (P=0.002) and possibly AVR (P=0.046). None of the retinal vessel parameters were predictive of AMD severity score or new onset of CNV or CGA at 5 years. Conclusion: A lower arteriole-to-venule ratio may be associated with AMD severity, with narrower arterioles seen in the eyes with geographic atrophy, suggesting a role of the retinal vasculature in AMD pathophysiology. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000145.

2.
Cureus ; 14(3): e22817, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35399408

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With the advent of variant strains such as Delta and Omicron, there have been renewed concerns regarding transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) (coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)) disease to healthcare professionals, particularly during intubation procedures. Several forms of barrier protection aimed at decreasing the spread of aerosolized droplets were developed during the early onset of the pandemic. OBJECTIVES: Using a simulated airway model, we examined the impact that three separate barrier devices had on intubation time and success using both direct and video laryngoscopy. We hypothesized that the functionally simplistic devices would be preferred and would allow for faster intubations. METHODS: Just-in-time training sessions focusing on COVID-19 intubations were set up between March and June of 2020. Sixty-seven emergency physicians and anesthesiologists participated. For a subset of physicians, exact times to barrier device setup and both direct and indirect intubations using three different barrier devices were recorded. Subsequently, physicians were asked to fill out a survey regarding their experiences. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 60%. In general, this cohort preferred a plain clear plastic drape or clear plastic drape with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cube for direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy setups. The use of these two devices resulted in significantly faster times to completed intubation when compared with the fiberglass box while using a simulated task trainer. CONCLUSION: In general, a simple, plastic sheet was the preferred barrier device using video laryngoscopy. Although setup times were faster using the fiberglass box, intubation times were significantly faster using the plastic drape or PVC frame.

3.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 167(1): 25-34, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34491858

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Equivalent outcomes, such as procedural safety and audiometry, have been reported between endoscopic ear surgery (EES) and microscopic ear surgery (MES). This study aims to determine if EES leads to decreased postoperative pain when compared with MES. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from 2000 to 2020. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and standardized bias assessment was performed. Studies containing original data on postoperative pain following EES and MES were included. RESULTS: Fourteen studies fulfilled eligibility: 7 retrospective studies, 6 randomized controlled trials, and 1 case series. Studies included surgery for cholesteatoma (n = 3), tympanoplasty/myringoplasty (n = 6), and stapedotomy (n = 5), pooling data from 974 patients. Postoperative pain was quantitatively described through a variety of numeric pain scores. Meta-analysis was performed on 11 studies. Among the 7 studies utilizing the numeric rating scale or visual analog scale, postoperative pain in the EES cohort was significantly lower than that of the MES cohort (standardized mean difference = -1.45 [95% CI, -2.05 to -0.85], P < .001). Similarly, pain scores were lower in the EES cohort among the 4 studies utilizing the Three Grades Pain Scale (odds ratio = 0.2 [95% CI, 0.09-0.45], P < .001). Additional qualitative strengths identified in EES included significant improvements in visualization, operative time, postoperative complications, and decreased need for canalplasty. Quality assessment indicated low to moderate risk of bias for all studies. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis confirms that EES results in significantly less postoperative pain when compared with MES. This surgical approach should be considered in the armamentarium of otologic surgeons, allowing for improved outcomes.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia/métodos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Timpanoplastia/métodos
4.
Am J Case Rep ; 22: e931783, 2021 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34305134

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Bupropion is a norepinephrine/dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (NDRI) that has been reported to increase the risk of suicide attempts in some patients. This report is of a case of a 19-year-old woman with a history of depression who suffered fatal cardiorespiratory failure following an overdose of prescribed bupropion. CASE REPORT A 19-year-old woman presented to the Emergency Department with an estimated bupropion overdose of 28.2 g and possible oxcarbazepine co-ingestion. This serum level was estimated based on the patient's history of medication reconciliation and number of pills remaining in the prescription bottle at presentation. The patient was unresponsive on arrival to the Emergency Department and was treated for intermittent seizures and shock. Despite aggressive medical interventions, her condition progressed to cardiogenic shock and eventually cardiac arrest, from which she could not be resuscitated. Several existing reports regarding bupropion overdose describe sinus tachycardia and seizures corrected by symptomatic treatment. This case may document the highest reported ingestion of bupropion recorded thus far in the literature and demonstrates the rapid onset of cardiac dysfunction and cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSIONS In the context of this case, we discuss the clinical manifestations of bupropion overdose and the rapid progression to cardiogenic shock. By examining the pathophysiology of overdose in an adolescent who consumed an extremely high dose of bupropion, we hope this information can be helpful to clinicians who are managing similarly challenging critical cases.


Assuntos
Bupropiona , Overdose de Drogas , Adolescente , Adulto , Depressão , Feminino , Humanos , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Choque Cardiogênico , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Cancer ; 12(4): 1212-1219, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33442419

RESUMO

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an innovative form of immunotherapy wherein autologous T-cells are genetically modified to express chimeric receptors encoding an antigen-specific single-chain variable fragment and costimulatory molecules. Moreover, CAR T-cell therapy can only work successfully in patients who have an intact immune system. Therefore, patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy will be immunosuppressed making CAR-T therapy less effective. In adoptive CD8+ T-cell therapy (ACT), numerous tumor-specific, engineered T-cells are sourced from patients, expanded in vitro, and infused back expressing tumor-specific antigen receptors. The most successful ACT, anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy directed against B-cell lymphoma, has proved to be efficacious. However, current efforts to utilize this approach for solid tumors, like breast cancer, have shown only modest improvement. Nevertheless, the potential efficacy of CAR-T therapy is promising in an era of immunological advances. By appropriately manipulating CAR T-cells to combat the immunosuppressive forces of the tumor microenvironment, significant eradication of the solid tumor may occur. This review discusses CAR T-cell therapy and its specificity and safety in adoptive cell transfers in breast cancer. We will highlight novel discoveries in CAR T-cell immunotherapy and the formidable barriers including suppression of T-cell function and localization at tumor sites.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...