RESUMO
This laboratory experiment investigated the effects of trainer expressiveness, lecture organization, and trainee goal orientation on training outcomes. Participants (N = 135) listened to lectures that differed in organization and trainer expressiveness. Participants completed recall and problem-solving tests immediately and 2 days later. The results indicated that participants had the highest recall after an expressive and organized lecture. The findings for problem-solving performance were more complex. Participants with a high mastery orientation had their poorest problem-solving performance after listening to an organized and inexpressive lecture, whereas participants with a low mastery orientation did not respond to the effects of organization or expressiveness.
Assuntos
Educação , Rememoração Mental , Resolução de Problemas , Adolescente , Adulto , Atitude , Emoções Manifestas , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Masculino , Psicologia IndustrialRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine if large angle esotropia and exotropia could impact a person's ability to obtain employment. DESIGN: Laboratory experiment. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-nine respondents unaware of the purpose of the study. METHODS: Photographs of two men and two women were digitally altered to create photographs of the same individual in an orthotropic, esotropic, and exotropic state. The photographs were then randomly affixed to similarly qualified job resumes. The 79 study respondents, unaware of the purpose of the study, were asked to (1) rate each individual applicant on selected job qualification variables, and (2) rank the applicants against each other in order of hiring preference. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Individual applicant rating and hiring preference scores. RESULTS: Women with normal ocular alignment received greater hiring preference scores than did strabismic women (P = 0.007). No difference in hiring preference scores was noted between strabismic and non-strabismic male applicants (P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Large angle horizontal strabismus appeared to be vocationally significant for female applicants, reducing a strabismic female applicant's ability to obtain employment. The presence of strabismus did not appear to influence hiring decisions of male applicants.