Experience of Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients Supported by Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) After ECMO Educational Crash Course.

During a 6 week period beginning early March 2020, 30 patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This volume increase mandated rapidly training 116 nurses with no prior ECMO experience via a 2 hour crash course. A qualitative study using semistructured, in-depth interviews was conducted to evaluate the experiences of this unique nursing cohort. Fourteen registered nurses meeting inclusion criteria of no prior ECMO experience, attendance of ECMO educational crash course, direct assignment of COVID-19 patients requiring ECMO, and willingness to consent to recorded interviews participated in the study. Two semistructured interviews were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of the interviews was completed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Six themes identified were anxiety and fear of patient harm, isolation and depersonalization, value of didactic education with reinforced clinical experience, professional growth, importance of team collaboration, and pride and gratitude. Subthemes were additionally extracted. Nurses faced multiple obstacles during the pandemic. ECMO added a layer of complexity, as these patients required labor-intensive, high acuity nursing care. The impact of the pandemic and its unique challenges on nursing and medical staff warrants further investigation.

Developing a new pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to critically evaluate the effectiveness of a designated ECMO team in our ECMO selection process and patient outcomes in the first 3 years of our low-volume pediatric ECMO program. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received an ECMO consultation between the start of our program in March 2015 and May 2018. We gathered clinical and demographic information on patients who did and did not receive ECMO, and described our selection process. We reflected on the processes used to initiate our program and our outcomes in the first 3 years. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients received consultations, and of those, 50 patients were potential candidates. 19 (38%) of the candidates were ultimately placed on ECMO. There were statistically significant differences in oxygen saturation, paO2, oxygenation index, A-aDO2, lactate, and pH between the patients who went on ECMO and who did not. We improved our outcomes from 0% survival to discharge in 2015, to 60% in 2018, with an average of 63% survival to discharge over the first 3 years of our program. CONCLUSIONS: In a low-volume pediatric ECMO center, having a designated team to assist in the patient selection process and management can help provide safe and efficient care to these patients, and improve patient outcomes. Having a strict management protocol and simulation sessions involving all members of the medical team yields comfort for the providers and optimal care for patients. This study describes our novel structure, processes, and outcomes, which we hope will be helpful to others seeking to develop a new pediatric ECMO program.

Utility of D-dimers in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

A retrospective study was performed examining the trend of inflammatory markers, including D-dimers, in 29 COVID-19 patients requiring veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. We observed that COVID-19 patients with pre-cannulation D-dimer levels >3,000 ng/mL had a significantly shorter time from admission to cannulation (4.78 vs . 8.44 days, p = 0.049) compared to those with D-dimer <3,000 ng/mL. Furthermore, patients with D-dimer >3,000 ng/mL had a trend of lower pH (7.24 vs . 7.33), higher pCO 2 (61.33 vs . 50.69), and higher vasoactive inotropic score (7.23 vs . 3.97) at time of cannulation, however, these were not statistically significant. This cohort of patients also required a longer duration of ECMO support (51.44 vs . 31.25 days). However, 13 patients required at least one ECMO-circuit exchange and 16 patients did not require any exchanges. There was a consistent drop in D-dimer values after every circuit exchange, which was not observed in any of the other examined inflammatory markers, including ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, or C-reactive protein. We propose that elevated D-dimer levels (>3,000 ng/mL) reflect increased disease severity in COVID-19, and predict a longer ECMO course. Once on ECMO, however, the D-Dimer level consistently decreased with every circuit exchange, which may reflect thrombus within the oxygenator rather than just disease severity.

Antithrombotic management for Impella® temporary ventricular assist devices: An analysis of an academic health-system experience.

The use of acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increased over the last decade. For patients with left-ventricular failure, an Impella® (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) may be used to improve cardiac output. The purpose of this study is to describe Impella® anticoagulation patterns and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of our protocol. This is a retrospective review of all adult patients who required at least 24 h of Impella® support and received a heparin-based purge solution. In total, 109 patients were included in the final analysis. The most common indication for Impella® device insertion was cardiogenic shock (76%) with the remaining patients receiving a device for a high-risk procedures; typically coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 9 thrombotic events occurred among 8 (7%) patients and 50 bleeding events occurred among 43 (39%) patients, with the most common classification being BARC 3a (60%). A univariate analysis revealed that patients were more likely to bleed if they were less than 65 years old, had an indication of cardiogenic shock for Impella®, inserted the device peripherally, were on dual antiplatelet therapy, or had an intra-aortic balloon pump prior to Impella® insertion, the latter of which was confirmed with a multivariate analysis (OR 2.5 [1.072-5.830]; p = 0.034). For those monitored by anti-Xa, the presence of two or more values greater than 0.40 IU/mL was a risk factor for bleeding (p = 0.037). Our study identifies risk factors for bleeding in patients receiving temporary MCS with an Impella®.

Safety and Feasibility of an Early Mobilization Protocol for Patients with Femoral Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumps as Bridge to Heart Transplant.

Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) can be used to provide hemodynamic support in patients with end-stage heart failure as a bridge to transplantation (BTT). The IABP is commonly inserted via the common femoral artery, which can limit patients' mobility. The Ramsey protocol, developed by a critical care physical therapist, allows patients with femoral IABPs to ambulate with the assistance of a tilt table. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of a modified Ramsey protocol for early mobilization of patients with femoral IABPs as BTT. This is a retrospective single-center review of patients with femoral IABPs as BTT using a tilt table protocol from May 2019 to May 2020. Primary outcomes were time to successful ambulation, number of successful ambulation events, and ambulation-associated adverse events, including IABP augmentation, waveform, positioning changes, and vascular complications at the insertion site. Twenty-four patients (mean age 55 ± 16 years) underwent femoral IABP insertion as BTT and were mobilized following our protocol. Nineteen patients (79.2%) successfully ambulated with a median of three sessions (interquartile range, 2-4) per patient. The median time from IABP insertion to ambulation was 3 days (interquartile range, 2-5). Twenty-one patients underwent heart transplantation, of which all 19 who ambulated were successfully bridged to transplantation. Early mobilization in select patients with femoral IABPs can be performed safely and successfully, avoiding the deleterious effects of bed rest that have been historically seen in this patient population.

Impact of CytoSorb Hemoadsorption on Sedation Requirements in Patients With Severe COVID-19 on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb has been used as an adjunct in the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related respiratory failure. It remains unknown if CytoSorb hemoadsorption will alter sedative and analgesic dosing in critically ill patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). We conducted a retrospective review of patients with severe COVID-19 requiring VV-ECMO for respiratory support. Patients who were enrolled in a clinical study of CytoSorb were compared with patients on VV-ECMO alone. Data were collected for the 72-hour CytoSorb therapy and an additional 72 hours post-CytoSorb, or a corresponding control time period. Sedative and analgesic doses were totaled for each day and converted to midazolam or fentanyl equivalents, respectively. The primary endpoint, change in sedative and analgesic requirements over time, were compared using a two-way mixed analysis of variance. Of the 30 patients cannulated for VV-ECMO for COVID-19, 4 were excluded, leaving 8 patients in the CytoSorb arm and 18 in the Control. There was no effect of CytoSorb therapy on midazolam equivalents over the 72-hour therapy (p = 0.71) or the 72 hours post-CytoSorb (p = 0.11). In contrast, there was a significant effect of CytoSorb therapy on fentanyl equivalents over the first 72 hours (p = 0.01), but this was not consistent over the 72-hours post-CytoSorb (p = 0.23). CytoSorb therapy led to significant increases in analgesic requirements without impacting sedative requirements. Further research is needed to define the relevance of CytoSorb hemoadsorption on critical care pharmacotherapy.

Morbidity of conversion from venovenous to venoarterial ECMO in neonates with meconium aspiration or persistent pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes in neonates receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) and/or persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) are favorable. Infants with preserved perfusion are often offered venovenous (VV) support to spare morbidities of venoarterial (VA) ECMO. Worsening perfusion or circuit complications can prompt conversion from VV-to-VA support. We examined whether outcomes in infants requiring VA ECMO for MAS/PPHN differed if they underwent VA support initially versus converting to VA after a VV trial, and what factors predicted conversion. METHODS: We reviewed the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry from 2007 to 2017 for neonates with primary diagnoses of MAS/PPHN. Propensity score analysis matched VA single-runs (controls) 4:1 against VV-to-VA conversions based on age, pre-ECMO pH, and precannulation arrests. Primary outcomes were complications and survival. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact testing. Multivariate regression identified independent predictors of conversion for VV patients. RESULTS: 3831 neonates underwent ECMO for MAS/PPHN, including 2129 (55%) initially requiring VA support. Of 1702 patients placed on VV ECMO, 98 (5.8%) required VV-to-VA conversion. Compared with 364 propensity-matched isolated VA controls, conversion runs were longer (190 vs. 127 h, P < 0.001), were associated with more complications, and decreased survival to discharge (70% vs. 83%, P = 0.01). On multivariate regression, conversion was more likely if neonates on VV ECMO did not receive surfactant (OR = 1.7;95%CI = 1.1-2.7;P = 0.03) or required high-frequency ventilation (OR = 1.9;95%CI = 1.2-3.3;P = 0.01) before ECMO. CONCLUSION: Conversion from VV-to-VA ECMO in infants with MAS/PPHN conveys increased morbidity and mortality compared to similar patients placed initially onto VA ECMO. VV patients not receiving surfactant or requiring high-frequency ventilation before cannulation may have increased risk of conversion. While conversions remain rare, decisions to offer VV ECMO for MAS/PPHN must be informed by inferior outcomes observed should conversion be required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence 3 Retrospective comparative study.

Clinical Use of Cangrelor After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may require mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The combination of dual antiplatelet therapy with cangrelor and continuous anticoagulation required for MCS may increase the risk of bleeding. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to describe the complications and outcomes of patients who received cangrelor during MCS following PCI. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational case series of 17 patients who received cangrelor while on MCS from June 2017 to September 2019. RESULTS: In a case series of 17 patients, 8 patients (47%) were supported with an Impella device and 4 patients (24%) with venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 5 required (29%) concomitant VA ECMO and Impella support in the setting of cardiogenic shock. All patients received triple antithrombotic therapy with aspirin, heparin, and cangrelor. Cangrelor was commonly initiated at a median dose of 0.75 (range 0.5-4) µg/kg/min. Cangrelor dose adjustments included changes in increments up to 0.25 µg/kg/min with review of P2Y12 levels. A total of 10 patients (59%) experienced a bleeding event, most commonly located at the peripheral cannulation site (40%) and in the gastrointestinal tract (30%). Seven (70%) and 3 (30%) of the bleeding complications were classified as major and minor, respectively. No patient developed in-stent thrombosis during the hospitalization; 14 (82%) patients survived their MCS course. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This case series suggests that cangrelor doses less than 0.75 µg/kg/min may be beneficial. Larger studies should evaluate alternative dosing regimens.

Successful use of an automated proning system to achieve prone positioning in a patient with severe ARDS requiring veno-venous ECMO.

A morbidly obese middle aged woman in her 40's presented to another hospital with methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus pneumonia and subsequently developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Her oxygenation demonstrated no improvement with low tidal volume ventilation, paralysis, or prostagladin therapy. She was unable to be manually proned secondary to her habitus. She was subsequently transferred to our facility, where she was initiated on VV-ECMO. Maximal flow through the ECMO circuit was inadequate for oxygenation given significant systemic shunt through her native lungs. In order to optimize lung protective ventilation and treat ARDS, we used an automated kinetic system (Rotoprone Therapy System) to prone the patient. To our knowledge, this is the first description in the literature of using an automated proning system with an ECMO circuit in place. This report describes the technique we used to safely perform axial rotations for two days with fewer providers required than manual proning.

Sedation Requirements in Patients on Venovenous or Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Background:There is a paucity of data evaluating optimal dosing strategies of commonly utilized opioids and sedatives for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support where pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables of these administered agents are altered. Objective: To assess the daily dosing requirement of sedatives and analgesics for patients on venovenous (VV) and venoarterial (VA) ECMO after the initial ECMO cannulation period. Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational study of adult patients receiving sedation and analgesia while receiving ECMO support for at least 24 hours. Patients cannulated at an outside hospital more than 24 hours before transfer, those with a history of intravenous drug use or acute alcohol withdrawal, or those who died within 48 hours of ECMO initiation were excluded. Results: We evaluated 26 patients on ECMO, including 13 on VV and 13 on VA ECMO. The median dose of fentanyl was 140 µg/h, with the VV group requiring a higher dose compared with the VA group (167 vs 106 µg/h, P < 0.001). The median doses of dexmedetomidine and propofol were 0.7 µg/kg/h and 26 µg/kg/min, respectively, with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.38 and P = 0.24, respectively). The median daily doses of fentanyl, dexmedetomidine, and propofol did not significantly increase throughout the time on ECMO support. Conclusions and Relevance: We found that the overall opioid daily dosing requirements were lower than previously reported in the literature. Additionally, light sedation strategies with a target RASS of -1 to 0 are feasible in this patient population.

Evaluation of Anti-Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Monitoring of Heparin in Adult Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

The approach to monitoring anticoagulation in adult patients receiving heparin on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is controversial. The objective of this study was to compare the correlation between anti-Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) with heparin dose and to describe their association with clinical events in adult ECMO patients. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 34 adult ECMO patients whose heparin was monitored by anti-Xa and/or aPTT. The heparin dose-to-assay correlation coefficient was 0.106 for aPTT and 0.414 for anti-Xa (p < 0.001). Major thrombotic and hemorrhagic events occurred in 14.7% and 26.5% of patients, respectively. The median anti-Xa in patients who experienced a major thrombotic event was 0.09 (0.06-0.25) IU/mL compared with 0.36 (0.26-0.44) IU/mL in patients who did not (p = 0.031), whereas the median aPTT did not differ between these groups. The maximum aPTT in patients who experienced a major bleed was 96.9 (76.0-200) seconds compared with 63.5 (44.4-98.6) seconds in patients who did not (p = 0.049), whereas the maximum anti-Xa did not differ between these groups. Monitoring both anti-Xa and aPTT may be warranted to safely provide understanding of pure heparin activity as well as underlying bleeding diatheses in adult ECMO patients.