Audit and education in transfusion medicine.

Because transfusions carry risks to the patient and because inappropriate transfusions are costly, interest in audits and effective education in transfusion medicine has increased over the last decade. Audits identify areas of practice that can be improved by follow-up education of the physicians who prescribe the transfusions. Successful educational approaches to follow-up on problems identified by audit include 30-min one-on-one meetings with surgeons, traditional scheduled teaching conferences, daily clinical rounds on transfused patients, prospective review of blood transfusions and installation of transfusion practice algorithms in the operating room. Other than identifying inappropriate transfusions, audit and education have also been used successfully to improve bedside blood administration practices, decrease unnecessary crossmatches and reduce outdating of donor blood. Multi-institutional audits play a useful benchmarking role. In summary, audit followed by targeted education can improve practices in transfusion medicine.

Physician recommendation as the key factor in patients' decisions to participate in preoperative autologous blood donation programs: Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation Study Group.

To determine whether the physician or patient had initiated the discussion regarding preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) and to assess the relative importance of the physician's recommendation in patients' decision to donate, responses were obtained from 254 of 409 patients (62%) who had donated preoperatively during the 3 study months. Nearly all (96%) strongly agreed they would donate again for themselves and nearly all (94%) strongly agreed they would recommend PABD to others. Patients initiated the discussion about PABD 23% of the time, while 71% indicated strong surgeon input. The remaining respondents said their surgeon had "mentioned it, but said it was up to me." The importance of avoiding transfusion reactions was rated significantly greater among those whose surgeons had initiated the discussion, as was the relative weight of the surgeon's recommendation. The desire to alleviate the blood shortage was rated much less important among patients who had initiated the discussion themselves.

Effectiveness of transfusion audits and practice guidelines.

To seek evidence of the effectiveness of transfusion audits and practice guidelines in improving transfusion practice, transfusion audit literature was reviewed. The inherent limitation of this approach is that investigators are more likely to report success and less likely to report unsuccessful experiences. Measures of success included decrease in units transfused, decrease in inappropriate units transfused, or increase in appropriate transfusion practice. Side benefits of audits included continuous improvement in practice guidelines, improvement in technologists' education, opportunities for consultation, and identification of areas for further research. Most successful programs had a common thread: individual education of the ordering physician by the transfusion medicine physician. In addition, for most successful programs, audits occurred in a timely manner, either before transfusion or during the 24 hours or weekend after the transfusion. In conclusion, several reports provide corroborating evidence to suggest that transfusion audits can improve transfusion practice if performed in a timely manner and if individual education of ordering physicians is provided by transfusion medicine physicians.

Efficacy of preoperative donation of blood for autologous use in radical prostatectomy.

To determine the amount of blood lost, the number of transfusions, and the effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donation in radical prostatectomy, 163 patients' records from 1987 to 1991 were reviewed at four university hospitals and three community hospitals. Calculated red cell volume lost was 1003 +/- 535 mL (mean +/- SD), which corresponds to 44 +/- 18 percent (mean +/- SD) of total red cell volume. Preoperative donation of blood for autologous use reduced the rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood from 66 to 20 percent (p < 0.001). Of the patients who donated 1 to 2 units, 32 percent received allogeneic blood; 14 percent of those who donated 3 units received allogeneic blood. Donation of 4 units reduced the allogeneic transfusion rate to 11 percent. However, as the number of units donated increased (1-3 units), the units not transfused also increased (0-21%). Ninety-one (56%) of 163 patients donated fewer than 3 units. Autologous blood donation is effective in minimizing the transfusion of allogeneic blood to radical prostatectomy patients, but many patients do not donate enough blood (< 3 units). The donation of 3 units of blood for autologous use is recommended for patients who undergo radical prostatectomy.

Prospects for control of hepatitis B virus infection: implications of childhood vaccination and long-term protection.

Hepatitis B vaccine has been recommended for high-risk individuals in the United States for more than a decade. This targeted strategy, however, has failed to control hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Universal immunization is being considered as an alternative approach, in particular the inclusion of hepatitis B vaccine with routine childhood vaccinations. Data presented herein demonstrate a high degree of efficacy for hepatitis vaccine with hepatitis B immune globulin in preventing perinatal HBV infection in newborns. Immune response to vaccine was dependent in part on the dose administered, with some enhancement of response if the infant was older at the time of initial injection or if the booster dose was given later. Long-term follow-up showed persistence of vaccine-induced antibody for 5 to 10 years in 90% of immunized infants and adults. Only 3% to 5% of these high-risk individuals had serologic evidence of an HBV infection. None of the infections had been symptomatic and none resulted in a chronic HBV carrier state. Thus, immune responses and efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine in infants were excellent, and immunity and protection against clinically significant HBV infection persisted for at least 5 to 10 years, features essential to success of a program of universal childhood immunization against HBV.

Improvement in appropriate autologous donations with local education: 1987 to 1989.

Preoperative autologous blood donation for elective surgery patients at university hospitals was underused in the past. More recently, national educational efforts have been made. To test the impact of local surgeon interviews and education, in 1988 the same local educational program was instituted at three university hospitals; three community hospitals were used as controls. Donation by appropriate patients of interviewed surgeons (elective surgery, crossmatch recommended, no contraindications to donation) increased from 24 percent (44/180) to 40 percent (88/222) (p = 0.002) and 15 percent (21/143) to 32 percent (41/127) (p = 0.001) at two university hospitals where the investigator-educators were on site, but not at the three community hospitals. Between 1987 and 1989, donation rates at all six hospitals remained low among patients for whom autologous donation was (probably) less appropriate. Donation rates for type and screen procedures were 3.0 percent (131/4587) in 1987 and 3.0 percent (199/6606) in 1989 (p = 0.67). Donation rates for "no blood order" procedures were 0.2 percent (15/9429) in 1987 and 0.1 percent (9/11,239) in 1989 (p = 0.14). It can be concluded that appropriate autologous blood donations increased at university hospitals where surgeons were individually interviewed and educated by an investigator on site. However, despite this increase, apparently eligible elective surgery patients in 1989 still failed to donate. This situation deserves additional investigation.

Factors associated with successful autologous blood donation for elective surgery.

Not all donors can donate the number of autologous blood units requested by their physicians before surgery, and donors are more frequently unsuccessful as more units are requested. Therefore, 368 autologous blood donors who were requested to donate 4 or more units during the 6-week period before surgery at one community blood center were studied. More men were able to donate 4 units with no deferrals for anemia than were women (86% [181 of 211] compared to 42% [48 of 115], P less than 0.001). Greater success also was observed among donors with an initial hemoglobin level greater than 125 g/L (12.5 g/dL), those with higher weight, and those with more advanced age. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only higher initial hemoglobin levels (odds ratio, 3.3 per 10 g/L [1 g/dL] increment) and male sex (odds ratio, 2.7) were independent predictors of successful donation of 4 or more units.

Blood loss and replacement in total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter study. The Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation Study Group.

To determine blood loss, the number of transfusions, and the hemoglobin levels achieved in patients via transfusion in the course of total hip arthroplasty, 324 patient records from 1987 through 1989 were reviewed at three university and three community hospitals. Calculated blood loss was 3.2 +/- 1.3 units in primary procedures and 4.0 +/- 2.1 units in revision procedures (mean +/- SD). Of 777 red cell units transfused, 455 (59%) were autologous units. Transfused patients received 2.0 +/- 1.8 units for primary procedures and 2.9 +/- 2.3 units for revision procedures (mean +/- SD). The maximum number of units given to 95 percent of the transfused patients was 4 for primary procedures and 6 for revision procedures. The mean postoperative hemoglobin level after all transfusions was 103 to 110 g per L, regardless of patient age group of physical status, autologous donor status, or hospital. No difference in length of hospital stay was observed for patients less than 65 years old with hemoglobin concentrations of 80 to 139 g per L at discharge.

Laboratory hemostatic abnormalities in massively transfused patients given red blood cells and crystalloid.

Most of the literature on massive transfusion concerns whole blood replacement, whereas clinically, packed red blood cells are commonly given. To determine when hemostatic abnormalities occur in patients resuscitated primarily with packed red blood cells and crystalloid, the cases of 39 consecutive patients who were transfused with 10 or more red blood cell units of any kind within 24 hours were reviewed. After transfusion with 20 or more units of red blood cell products of any kind (packed red blood cells, cell-saver units, or whole blood), 75% (3 of 4) of patients had platelet counts less than 50 x 10(9)/L, compared to 0 of 29 patients given less than 20 units (P less than 0.001). After transfusion of 12 units of relatively plasma-free red blood cell products (packed red blood cells or cell-saver units), 100% (8 of 8) of patients had prothrombin time prolonged by more than 1.5 times mid-range of normal, compared to 36% (5 of 14) of patients given less than 12 units (P = 0.012). These data confirm that patients massively transfused with red blood cells of any kind develop significant thrombocytopenia after 20 units. Importantly, probably clinically significant prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time prolongations occurred consistently after transfusion of 12 units of relatively plasma-free red blood cells in unselected patients at an urban trauma hospital. These data suggest that coagulation factor replacement is necessary in patients who receive 12 or more units of packed red blood cells or cell-saver blood, and platelet replacement is necessary in patients who receive 20 or more units of any red blood cell product. A prospective study is needed to determine whether the expected abnormal clinical bleeding indeed occurs in patients with such laboratory coagulation abnormalities and to determine when plasma transfusion is indicated in patients massively transfused with red blood cells.

Probable reasons that autologous blood was not donated by patients having surgery for which crossmatched blood was ordered.

Preoperative autologous blood donation is used by only a small percentage of surgery patients for whom crossmatched blood is ordered. To document the reasons the patients failed to donate, the medical records of surgical patients at three university and three community hospitals were studied. All procedures for which crossmatched blood was ordered, but for which autologous blood was not available, were included (n = 8121). Probable reasons for nondonation were found in 72 percent of university hospital patients and 65 percent of community hospital patients (n = 6064 and n = 2057, respectively). The most frequent reasons for nondonation among university hospital patients were emergency surgery (27%) and age less than 12 years (17%), and those among community hospital patients were emergency surgery (42%) and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status greater than or equal to 4 (20%). Surprisingly, anemia (hemoglobin less than 11 g/dL [less than 110 g/L]) as the only limitation to donation was rarely found: this was the sole reason in only 3.3 percent of university hospital and 4.5 percent of community hospital patients. Overall, of 8121 patients who failed to donate autologous blood, 5731 (71%) had legitimate medical reasons. The remaining 2390 (29%) had no identifiable reason for nondonation, and recruitment efforts should be focused on them and their surgeons.

Donor room personnel attitudes toward autologous donors.

Patients with serious illnesses who donate their blood for autologous use create anxiety for many phlebotomists. Donor room staff were surveyed at three donor centers, using confidential questionnaires, to identify their concerns and to evaluate factors associated with reduced anxiety toward autologous donors. Among respondents (n = 93), 58 percent had patient care experience within the last 5 years, which correlated with diminished concern about phlebotomizing cardiac patients (r = .21; p = 0.04). Fifty-seven percent of respondents had drawn blood from greater than 50 autologous donors. Surprisingly, the experience of drawing blood from relatively large numbers of autologous donors did not correlate with increased confidence in phlebotomizing pediatric, cardiac, and elderly patients (r = -.04; p = 0.75). Those respondents who felt that they had adequate medical support agreed with more liberal donor criteria and were more confident about phlebotomizing pediatric, cardiac, and elderly patients (r = -.32; p = 0.001). Those respondents who believed most strongly in the benefits of autologous transfusion had the least anxiety toward donors who were medically more complex (r = .39; p = 0.0001). It is concluded that, contrary to what might be expected, phlebotomizing large numbers of autologous donors does not reduce the anxiety of staff members when they encounter donors with complex medical problems. Factors that do reduce anxiety include dependable physician and other medical support services, previous experience in direct patient care, and knowledge of the benefits of autologous transfusion.

Return of autologous blood donors as homologous blood donors.

Autologous blood donors (ABDs) have been reported to have favorable attitudes toward returning as homologous blood donors (HBDs), but the frequency of return has not been well documented. ABDs eligible by history to be HBDs were followed at one blood center: 255 donating for elective surgery and 234 donating during pregnancy were followed for an average of 18 months and 20 months, respectively, from time of eligibility after surgery or postpartum. Male ABDs had a higher rate of return as HBDs, as 34 percent (21/62) returned to donate an average of 3 units, whereas 13 percent (56/427) of female ABDs returned as HBDs to donate an average of 2 units. Although a history of donation was associated with a higher rate of return (30%, 34/113), 11 percent (43/376) of ABDs with no history as HBDs returned to donate homologous units, despite having been recruited less frequently than prior HBDs. Overall, all male ABDs and female ABDs with an HBD history returned most frequently. The extra effort required for an autologous donor program may result in the recruitment of new donors into the HBD pool.

Lack of increased bleeding after paracentesis and thoracentesis in patients with mild coagulation abnormalities.

To determine whether untreated mild coagulopathy in patients with no evidence of clinical bleeding is associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage after paracentesis or thoracentesis, retrospective examination was conducted of 608 consecutive procedures for which prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), platelet (Plt) counts, and preprocedure and postprocedure hemoglobin concentrations were available. There was no increased bleeding in patients with mild to moderate coagulopathy (defined as PT or PTT up to twice the midpoint normal range or pit count of 50 to 99 x 10(3) per microL [50-99 x 10(9)/L]). However, patients with markedly elevated serum creatinine levels (6.0 to 14.0 mg/dL [530-1240 mumol/L]) had a significantly greater average hemoglobin loss (-0.82 +/- 1.3 g/dL [-8 +/- 13 g/L], n = 11) than patients with normal serum creatinine levels (-0.12 +/- 0.88 g/dL [-1 +/- 9 g/L], n = 450) (p = 0.011). Overall, the frequency of bleeding complications requiring red cell transfusions was very low: 0.2 percent of events. The most common diagnosis for patients who had paracentesis was alcoholic liver disease (72%); for those having thoracentesis, it was infection (37%). It can be concluded that, for these patients, prophylactic plasma or platelet transfusions are not necessary. Patients with markedly elevated serum creatinine deserve close postprocedure observation.

The variability of transfusion practice in coronary artery bypass surgery. Transfusion Medicine Academic Award Group.

We audited 540 patients undergoing elective first-time coronary artery bypass grafts at 18 institutions. The purposes of the study were to describe the variability in transfusions among institutions and to determine factors that may account for variability. Mean homologous red blood cell use per patient was 2.9(+/- 0.1) U (institutional range, 0.4 to 6.3 U). One hundred seventy-seven patients (32%) received plasma (institutional range, 0% to 97%), and 119 (22%) received platelets (institutional range, 0% to 80%). After controlling for patient and surgical practice variables, transfusion practice factors still accounted for variation in red blood cell transfusions. Variation in patients receiving plasma and platelet transfusions among institutions was determined in part by prophylactic transfusions. We conclude that blood component usage for coronary artery bypass grafts differs widely among institutions. The variability in use of these components is accounted for in part by unnecessary transfusions in otherwise routine, uncomplicated coronary artery bypass graft procedures.

Lack of increased bleeding after liver biopsy in patients with mild hemostatic abnormalities.

Prophylactic transfusions of fresh frozen plasma and platelets are sometimes given to patients with mild elevations in prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and mild thrombocytopenia before percutaneous liver biopsy. To determine whether PTs and PTTs 1.1-1.5 times midrange normal levels and platelet counts 50-99 x 10(9)/L are associated with increased bleeding complications, hospital records of all patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy during 56 consecutive months (n = 291) were reviewed. Complete information was available for 177 inpatient procedures (155 standard, 22 fine needle). Overall, the frequency of bleeding complications in patients with platelet counts greater than or equal to 50 X 10(9)/L was 3.4% (6 of 175), with no significant difference between patients with mild hemostatic abnormalities and patients with normal parameters. These data suggest that prophylactic transfusions may not be necessary. One factor was highly associated with bleeding complications: a patient diagnosis of malignancy, 14% (7 of 50) compared with 0.8% (1 of 127) among other patients (P less than 0.001). These patients should be monitored closely after biopsy.

Surgeons' knowledge, attitude, and use of preoperative autologous blood donation.

Before a comprehensive educational program on preoperative autologous blood donation was begun, 118 surgeons from three different areas of the country were tested to assess their baseline knowledge and attitude about this practice. Test results were correlated with the percentage of eligible patients that the surgeons actually referred for preoperative donation during a period of observation. The purpose of this preliminary effort was to identify areas in the educational program that required emphasis. Overall, the surgeons' attitude toward preoperative donation was quite favorable, but their depth of knowledge varied. Misunderstandings may have led to diminished use of this service (eg, about 50% didn't realize that many patients with medical conditions or low hematocrits are permitted to donate). However, it is not clear that simply bolstering surgeons' knowledge will increase their appropriate use of preoperative donation. When all 118 surgeons were studied, their knowledge and attitude were unrelated to the percentage of eligible patients referred. However, when 44 surgeons who managed the largest number of eligible patients were analyzed separately, their use of preoperative donation was directly correlated with their knowledge and attitude. The local awareness of AIDS also significantly influenced the use of this service. It is proposed that knowledge of preoperative donation may be important for inducing surgeons to begin referring patients for this service. Once a pattern of successful participation is established, referral seems to increase with the acquisition of working knowledge.