Validation of the FNIH sarcopenia criteria and SOF frailty index as predictors of long-term mortality in ambulatory older men.

OBJECTIVE: we aimed to evaluate the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) criteria for weakness and low muscle mass and the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) frailty index for prediction of long-term, all-cause mortality. DESIGN: community-based cohort study. SETTING: semi-rural community of Merelbeke (Belgium). SUBJECTS: ambulatory men aged 74 and more (n = 191). METHODS: weakness was defined on previously established criteria as low grip strength (<26 kg) or low grip strength-to-body mass index (BMI) ratio (<1.00). Low muscle mass (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) was categorised as low appendicular lean mass (ALM; predefined <19.75 kg) or low ALM-to-BMI ratio (predefined <0.789). Frailty status was assessed using the components of weight loss, inability to rise from a chair and poor energy (SOF index). Survival time was calculated as the number of months from assessment in 2000 until death or up to 15 years of follow-up. RESULTS: mean age of the participants was 78.4 ± 3.5 years. Combined weakness and low muscle mass was present in 3-8% of men, depending on the criteria applied. Pre-frailty and frailty were present in 30 and 7% of men, respectively. After 15 years of follow-up, 165 men (86%) died. Both the presence of combined weakness and low ALM-to-BMI ratio (age-adjusted HR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.30-4.79) and the presence of SOF frailty (age-adjusted HR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.44-4.86) were associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: our findings confirm the predictive value for mortality of the non-distribution-based FNIH criteria and SOF index in older community-dwelling Belgian men.

Physical function measurements predict mortality in ambulatory older men.

BACKGROUND: To assess and compare the predictive value of physical function measurements (PFMs) for all-cause mortality in older men and to evaluate the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) as a predictor in subjects with underlying comorbidity. DESIGN: Observational study of a population-based sample of 352 ambulatory older men aged 71-86 at study baseline. The Rapid disability rating scale-2, 36-Item short form health survey, Grip strength, Five times sit-to-stand test, Standing balance, and TUG were determined at baseline. Associations with all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Age, Body mass index (BMI), smoking status, education, physical activity and cognitive status were included as confounders. Follow-up exceeded 15 years. Comorbidity status was categorized into cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: All examined PFMs were associated with all-cause mortality. TUG was the best predictor (adjusted HR per SD increase = 1·58, 95% CI = 1·40-1·79, P < 0·001) for global mortality and continued to be predictive in subjects with cardiovascular disease (adjusted HR per SD increase = 1·80, 95% CI = 1·40-2·33, P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of physical functioning is important in the evaluation of older persons. We encourage the use of the TUG as a reliable, quick and feasible screening tool in clinical settings.