Three-dimensional evaluation of alveolar bone thickness of mandibular anterior teeth in different dentofacial types.

AIM: The aim of this randomized study was to compare the alveolar bone thickness (ABT) of the mandibular incisor teeth of dental and skeletal Class I, II, and III adult patients at labial and lingual aspects of the bone and develop recommendations for the associated movements of teeth in this region, taking vertical facial type into consideration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: : Sixty-two Class I, 74 Class II, and 63 Class III patients - aged between 20 and 45 - were assigned to three subgroups - high (H), low (L), and normal (N) growth patterns. On the axial slices of computerized tomographies, the measurements for the ABT on labial and lingual sides of the mandibular incisors were carried out at three levels. RESULTS: In Class I group, at apex region, ABT of subgroups N and L were greater than H, at labial side. In Class II, ABT of subgroups N and L were greater than H, at apex at both sides and cervical lingual region. Similarly, ABT of subgroup L of Class III group was greater than H, at labial and lingual apex, mid-root regions. In Class II, the ABT of subgroup H was greater than L, at lingual cementoenamel junction. CONCLUSIONS: ABT of mandibular incisors of Class I patients is not affected from vertical pattern except for apical region. There is not a thick bone on the lingual side of the Class II, high-angle patients. The ABT of the Class III, high-angle patients is thin as a risk factor for proclination.

Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer; comparison with Multidetector Row Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Endoscopic Ultrasonography / Papel de 18F-Fluorodeoxiglucosa por emisión de positrones/tomografía computarizada en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de cáncer de páncreas; una comparación con la tomografía computarizada multidetector, la resonancia magnética y la ecografía endoscópica

Objectives: We aimed to analyze the contribution of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) imaging to the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer compared with multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Material and methods: We retrospectively scanned the data of 52 patients who were referred for FDG PET/CT imaging for evaluation of pancreatic lesions greater than 10 mm. The diagnostic performances of 4 imaging methods and the impact of PET/CT on the management of pancreatic cancer were defined. Results: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 33 of 52 patients (63%), 15 patients had benign diseases of pancreas (29%), and 4 patients were normal (8%). Sensitivity and NPV of EUS and PET/CT were equal (100%) and higher than MDCT and MRI. Specificity, PPV and NPV of PET/CT were significantly higher than MDCT. However, sensitivities of two imaging methods were not significantly different. There was no significant difference between PET/CT and MRI and EUS for these values. When the cut-off value of SUVmax was 3.2, the most effective sensitivity and specificity values were obtained. PET/CT contributed to the management of pancreatic cancer in 30% of patients. Conclusion: FDG PET/CT is a valuable imaging method for the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer, especially when applied along with EUS as first line diagnostic tools (AU)

Objetivo: El objetivo fue analizar la contribución de la PET/TC con 18F-FDG (FDG PET/TC) en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de páncreas en comparación con la tomografía computarizada multidetector (TCMD), la resonancia magnética (RM) y la ecografía endoscópica (EUS). Material y métodos: Se revisaron retrospectivamente 52 pacientes que fueron remitidos para la evaluación de lesiones pancreáticas mayores de 10 mm mediante FDG PET/TC. Se definieron los hallazgos diagnósticos de los 4 métodos de imagen y el impacto de la FDG PET/TC en el tratamiento del cáncer de páncreas. Resultados: En 33 de los 52 pacientes (63%) se diagnosticó un adenocarcinoma pancreático; 15 pacientes tenían enfermedades benignas del páncreas (29%) y 4 pacientes no mostraron enfermedad pancreática (8%). La sensibilidad y el valor predictivo negativo (VPN) del EUS y la FDG PET/TC fueron iguales (100%) y superior a la TCMD y a la RM. La especificidad, el valor predictivo positivo y el VPN de la FDG PET/TC fueron significativamente mayores que la TCMD; sin embargo, la sensibilidad de 2 métodos de imagen no fue significativamente diferente. No hubo diferencias significativas entre la FDG PET/TC, RM y EUS. Con un punto de corte de SUVmax igual a 3,2 se obtuvieron los valores más efectivos de sensibilidad y de especificidad. La FDG PET/TC contribuyó al manejo clínico del cáncer de páncreas en 30% de los pacientes. Conclusión: La FDG PET/TC es un método de imagen valioso para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de páncreas, especialmente cuando se aplica junto con la EUS como primera línea de herramientas de diagnóstico (AU)

Metallic stent in the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fluid collections.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has become the preferred first-line approach. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) were considered as an alternative to multiple double pigtail stents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the endosonography guided drainage (EUS-GD) of PFCs with FCEMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 33 consecutive patients were included. Cystogastrostomy and cystoduodenostomy were created with a linear echoendoscope under endosonographic and fluoroscopic control. Procedures were performed in a standard way of, puncture with a 19 gauge needle, bougie dilation and insertion of FCSEMS. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients (mean age 52 years, 21 men, range: 18-77 years), were included. PFCs were 22 non-infected symptomatic pseudocyst and 11 walled-off necrosis or abscess. EUS-GD was successful in 30 (90.9%) patients. Stent insertion failed in one patient. Two patients needed surgery. Complications were observed in 8 (25%) patients (stent dislocation in 3, perforation in 2, bleeding in 2 and pneumoperitoneum in 1 patient). Procedure related mortality was not seen. The mean cyst size was 11.3 cm (5-22). FCSEMS were successful in the treatment of pseudocysts (after 1 month mean cyst size is 6.2 cm, range: 0-15 cm, with 54.8% decrement rate). During a mean follow-up of 15 months complete resolution was 66.6% (20 patients) and recurrence due to stent malfunction was 10%. All these cases were submitted to a new session of endoscopic drainage. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-GD, FCSEMS insertion provides an effective, minimally invasive, and safe approach in the management of PFCs.

Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer; comparison with multidetector row computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze the contribution of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) imaging to the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer compared with multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively scanned the data of 52 patients who were referred for FDG PET/CT imaging for evaluation of pancreatic lesions greater than 10mm. The diagnostic performances of 4 imaging methods and the impact of PET/CT on the management of pancreatic cancer were defined. RESULTS: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 33 of 52 patients (63%), 15 patients had benign diseases of pancreas (29%), and 4 patients were normal (8%). Sensitivity and NPV of EUS and PET/CT were equal (100%) and higher than MDCT and MRI. Specificity, PPV and NPV of PET/CT were significantly higher than MDCT. However, sensitivities of two imaging methods were not significantly different. There was no significant difference between PET/CT and MRI and EUS for these values. When the cut-off value of SUVmax was 3.2, the most effective sensitivity and specificity values were obtained. PET/CT contributed to the management of pancreatic cancer in 30% of patients. CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT is a valuable imaging method for the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer, especially when applied along with EUS as first line diagnostic tools.