Reduced effect of ischemic preconditioning against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury with cardiovascular risk factors in humans.

The extent that clustered CVD risk factors interfere with ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to protect against microvascular endothelial dysfunction with ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in humans is unclear. We hypothesized that adults with a clustered burden of ≥3 CVD risk factors would demonstrate a reduced capacity of IPC to protect endothelial function with I/R injury. Twenty-two (age: 45 ± 14 year) adults [12 healthy controls; 10 raised risk (10-year FRS risk score ~3%)] were studied using a 2 × 2 randomized cross-over design. Pulse arterial tonometry was used to assess microvascular endothelium-dependent vasodilation during reactive hyperemia in response to endothelial I/R injury (20 min brachial artery occlusion/45 min reperfusion) that was preceded by remote IPC (3 × 5 min ischemia/reperfusion) or mock IPC. In both groups, microvascular reactive hyperemia was reduced ~20% (both P < 0.01) after endothelial I/R injury without remote IPC. However, in control subjects remote IPC prevented endothelial I/R injury (from baseline reactive hyperemic ratio: 2.1 ± 0.4 AU to post I/R injury: 2.5 ± 0.5 AU; P = 0.09). In contrast, the reactive hyperemia ratio in raised risk subjects was significantly reduced from 2.2 ± 0.6 AU to 1.9 ± 0.5 AU (P = 0.0087) despite attempts to induce protection by remote IPC, with the magnitude of reduction similar to their mock IPC trial. The magnitude of remote IPC-mediated endothelial protection against I/R injury was inversely related to the number of risk factors. CVD risk factors diminish the effect of IPC to protect the microvasculature from I/R injury in humans. Translating IPC to clinical practice for vasculoprotection will continue to be challenging in patients with increased CVD risk.

No influence of ischemic preconditioning on running economy.

PURPOSE: Many of the potential performance-enhancing properties of ischemic preconditioning suggest that the oxygen cost for a given endurance exercise workload will be reduced, thereby improving the economy of locomotion. The aim of this study was to identify whether ischemic preconditioning improves exercise economy in recreational runners. METHODS: A randomized sham-controlled crossover study was employed in which 18 adults (age 27 ± 7 years; BMI 24.6 ± 3 kg/m2) completed two, incremental submaximal (65-85% VO2max) treadmill running protocols (3 × 5 min stages from 7.2-14.5 km/h) coupled with indirect calorimetry to assess running economy following ischemic preconditioning (3 × 5 min bilateral upper thigh ischemia) and sham control. Running economy was expressed as mlO2/kg/km and as the energy in kilocalories required to cover 1 km of horizontal distance (kcal/kg/km). RESULTS: Ischemic preconditioning did not influence steady-state heart rate, oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, energy expenditure, and blood lactate. Likewise, running economy was similar (P = 0.647) between the sham (from 201.6 ± 17.7 to 204.0 ± 16.1 mlO2/kg/km) and ischemic preconditioning trials (from 202.8 ± 16.2 to 203.1 ± 15.6 mlO2/kg/km). There was no influence (P = 0.21) of ischemic preconditioning on running economy expressed as the caloric unit cost (from 0.96 ± 0.12 to 1.01 ± 0.11 kcal/kg/km) compared with sham (from 1.00 ± 0.10 to 1.00 ± 0.08 kcal/kg/km). CONCLUSIONS: The properties of ischemic preconditioning thought to affect exercise performance at vigorous to severe exercise intensities, which generate more extensive physiological challenge, are ineffective at submaximal workloads and, therefore, do not change running economy.