MicroRNA-profiling of miR-371~373- and miR-302/367-clusters in serum and cerebrospinal fluid identify patients with intracranial germ cell tumors.

PURPOSE: Intracranial germ cell tumors (iGCT) comprise germinoma and non-germinoma. Their diagnosis predominantly relies on biopsy as only one-fifth of patients present with elevated biomarkers (AFP/ß-HCG) in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). MicroRNAs (miR/miRNA) have emerged as non-invasive biomarkers in extracranial GCT and may potentially facilitate non-invasive diagnosis in iGCT. METHODS: We analyzed eight miRNAs in serum and CSF from the miR-371~373- and miR-302/367-clusters and four miRNAs differentially expressed in iGCT tissue (miR-142-5p/miR-146a-5p/miR-335-5p/miR-654-3p) from eight iGCT patients (age 10-33 years) and 12 control subjects by pre-amplified RT-qPCR. MiR-30b-5p (serum) and miR-204-5p (CSF) acted as reference genes. ΔCt-values were expressed as [Formula: see text] after standardization against controls. RESULTS: Between iGCT and control patients' serum ΔCt-values of miR-371a-3p (p = 0.0159), miR-372-3p (p= 0.0095, miR-367 (p = 0.0190), miR-302a (p = 0.0381) and miR-302d-3p (p = 0.0159) differed significantly. Discriminatory pattern in CSF was similar to serum as miR-371a (p = 0.0286), miR-372-3p (p = 0.0028), miR-367-3p (p = 0.0167) and miR-302d-3p (p = 0.0061) distinguished between patients and controls. Abundant [Formula: see text] levels of each of these miRNAs were found across all serum and CSF samples including biomarker-negative patients. CONCLUSION: With the largest data set so far, we underline the suitability of miR-371a, miR-372, miR-367 and miR-302d in serum and CSF for diagnosis of iGCT, particularly in biomarker-negative germinoma. Diagnosis of iGCT by miRNA analysis is a feasible and valid approach, particularly as serum can be readily obtained by a less invasive procedure. MiRNA analysis may discriminate iGCT from other tumors with similar radiological findings and may allow to monitor response to therapy as well as early relapse during follow-up.

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay does not restrict influenza A virus propagation.

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) was identified as a process to degrade flawed cellular messenger RNA (mRNA). Within the last decades it was also shown that NMD carries virus-restricting capacities and thus could be considered a part of the cellular antiviral system. As this was shown to affect primarily positive-sense single stranded RNA ((+)ssRNA) viruses there is only scarce knowledge if this also applies to negative-sense single stranded RNA ((-)ssRNA) viruses. Influenza A viruses (IAVs) harbour a segmented (-)ssRNA genome. During their replication IAVs produce numerous RNA transcripts and simultaneously impair cellular transcription and translation. The viral mRNAs hold several molecular patterns which can elicit NMD and in turn would lead to their degradation. This, in consequence, may mitigate viral propagation. Thus, we examined if a knockdown or a pharmacological inhibition of NMD key components may influence IAV replication. Additionally, we performed similar experiments with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), another (-)ssRNA virus, but with a non-segmented genome. Although it seemed that a knockdown of up-frameshift protein 1 (UPF1), the central NMD factor, slightly increased viral mRNA and protein levels, no significant alteration of viral replication could be observed, implying that the NMD machinery may not have restricting capacities against (-)ssRNA viruses.