Characterizing response to a dynamic stability modeled approach for thumb carpometacarpal joint pain: A retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. INTRODUCTION: Literature trends indicate that thumb dynamic stabilization may benefit clients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint pain and arthritis. There is minimal research investigating whether client characteristics predict responsiveness to hand therapy for thumb dynamic stabilization. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: 1) To investigate how adults with thumb CMC joint pain responded to a hand therapy dynamic stabilization modeled intervention. 2) To determine if various client factors influenced responsiveness and to what extent. METHODS: An electronic medical record search identified adults treated from August 2009 through December 2015 for thumb CMC joint pain. Radiographs were retrospectively staged. Outcome measures were 1) Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) total disability score and 2) Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Paired t-tests were performed to compare pre and post treatment measures. Multivariate analyses were used to investigate predictive factors. RESULTS: A total of 249 charts were analyzed. Large overall significant effects were noted for disability score (QuickDASH P <.001, X = 12.1, Cohen's d = 0.9). The average improvement of 2.1 (SD = 2.6) points exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1.7 points on the NPRS pain scale. Significant predictors of QuickDASH Scores were radiographic staging, bilateral hand involvement and initial pain ratings. Significant predictors for change in pain scores (meeting or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference for the NPRS) were bilateral thumb involvement and initial "pain at worst" rating. CONCLUSION: After completing hand therapy with a dynamic stabilization approach, clients had less pain and disability. Those who had unilateral thumb pain, or those who started with higher pain levels were most likely to have clinically meaningful improvements in pain. Clients in early CMC osteoarthritis (OA) stages responded better than those in later stages, indicating that early referral to therapy is important.

Comparison of Volar and Dorsal Approach for PIP Arthroplasty.

Background: No consensus exists about whether a volar approach (VA) or dorsal approach (DA) for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthroplasty yields better results. Previously reported range of motion (ROM) and complications vary from study to study. This retrospective review compared the ROM and complication rates of VA and DA approaches to PIP arthroplasty. Methods: The study included 66 adults (88 digits) who underwent PIP arthroplasty from 2000 to 2015, with minimum 30-day follow-up. Demographic data, surgical approach, pre- and post-operative ROM, duration of immobilization, timing and duration of hand therapy (occupational therapy [OT]), and major and minor complications were recorded. We compared mean change in ROM, postoperative ROM, and complication rates, and examined the association of duration of immobilization and time to OT initiation with postoperative ROM. Results: While there was no difference in postoperative ROM between volar and dorsal groups (56° and 54°, respectively, P > .05), there was a greater gain in ROM in the DA group (25° vs 2.7°, P = .017). There was no statistically significant difference in overall incidence of complications (VA: 37.8%, DA: 30.3%; P > .05) or revision surgery (VA: 15.6%, DA: 17.1%; P > .05). There were no differences in duration of immobilization, time to OT initiation, or number of OT sessions between the two groups, and none of these correlated with postoperative ROM. Conclusions: We identified no statistical difference in mean postoperative ROM, incidence of complications or revision surgery between volar and dorsal approaches for PIP arthroplasty.

Preferred options and evidence for upper limb surgery for spasticity in cerebral palsy, stroke, and brain injury.

Surgical interventions for the spastic upper extremity secondary to stroke, traumatic brain injury, and cerebral palsy aim to correct the common deformities of elbow flexion, forearm pronation, wrist and finger flexion, ulnar deviation, and thumb-in-palm deformity. After appropriate evaluation, as well as determining the goals of surgery, deformity correction can be achieved through single-event, multi-level surgery. Surgery includes a combination of soft tissue lengthening, tendon transfer, and joint stabilization procedures. Surgical treatment for shoulder adduction/internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm pronation, wrist flexion, thumb-in-palm, and clenched fist deformities due to spasticity are discussed, and treatment outcomes are reviewed.

Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of Spastic Upper Extremity Conditions.

Surgical interventions for the spastic upper extremity aim to correct the common deformities of elbow flexion, forearm pronation, wrist flexion and ulnar deviation, and thumb-in-palm deformity. One goal is achieving optimal function and improved limb positioning. Aesthetics of the limb have a profound impact on self-esteem and satisfaction. Surgical deformity correction has not reliably been shown to improve sensory function such as stereognosis. Validated outcome measures are used to present outcomes after surgical treatment of the spastic upper extremity as it relates to motor function and limb positioning, sensory function, and self-esteem.