SPRINT Through Tasks: A Novel Curriculum for Improving Resident Task Management in the Emergency Department.

Introduction: The emergency department (ED) presents a challenging task-management environment to emergency medicine (EM) trainees. However, equipping residents with a tool to improve task switching (generically known as multitasking) could have positive impacts on patient care and physician emotional state. We designed a task-management tool and educational curriculum with the goal of improving emergency medicine resident task-switching ability. Methods: The task-management tool uses the acronym SPRINT: (1) stabilize critical patients, (2) perform procedures, (3) rack (see new patients in the chart rack), (4) in or out (reassess and disposition), (5) type it up (chart completion). These tasks and their order were decided on by two seasoned clinicians based on their years of experience in the ED. The SPRINT tool was taught to EM residents through a 1-hour curriculum consisting of an introductory video, a classroom-based workshop with multimedia didactics, and team learning with a card game simulating the use of the SPRINT tool on a shift. Residents were surveyed to evaluate their task-management confidence and perceived effectiveness of the curriculum. Results: A total of 34 EM residents participated in this training on the SPRINT tool. There was an improvement in resident confidence in task management, and residents reporting having a strategy for task prioritization 8 weeks after the workshop. Discussion: The SPRINT curriculum provides EM residents with a tool to manage the complex task-management environment of the ED. Further research in task-management education should focus on patient-oriented outcomes among physicians who have received this training.

Are three ports better than one? An evaluation of flow rates using all ports of a triple lumen central venous catheter in volume resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Poiseuille's law states flow rates are directly proportional to the radius to the 4th power and indirectly proportional to the length of a tube. Because of this property, large bore catheters are commonly used in the resuscitation of the critically ill patient. However, there are no studies comparing simultaneous use of all three lumens of a triple lumen (TL) central venous catheter (CVC) with other catheter types. Our objective was to compare the flow rates of normal saline (NS) through various resuscitation catheters against a TL CVC using all 3 ports. METHODS: We performed a blinded prospective observational study of flow rates utilizing multiple resuscitation catheters. Each catheter type was attached to a 1l bag of NS using standard saline tubing and mean time to infuse 1l of normal saline was determined. Three trials each were completed with and without pressure bags. RESULTS: Simultaneous infusion of NS through all ports of a TL CVC demonstrated no statistically significant difference compared to the following catheters: 16ga peripheral venous catheter (PVC) and 6 Fr CVC with pressure bag. The 14 g PVC and 8.5Fr CVC had statistically significant faster flow rates than the TL CVC both with and without a pressure bag. The 6Fr CVC showed significantly faster flow rates than the TL CVC without a pressure bag. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous use of all 3 ports of a TL CVC generates flow rates comparable to many other commonly used resuscitation catheters.