High-resolution nerve ultrasound and corneal confocal microscopy in taxane-induced polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The role of high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) in the early detection of taxane-induced polyneuropathy (TIPN) is unclear. The present prospective longitudinal controlled observational pilot study estimates the role of HRUS and CCM in the early diagnosis of TIPN in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Fifteen breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel and 15 healthy age matched controls were included. Visits before and 3 weeks, 8 weeks and 6 months after treatment included clinical examination, the total neuropathy score, nerve conduction studies (NCS), monocular CCM including corneal nerve fibre length, density and branching and HRUS of bilateral median, ulnar, radial, tibial, peroneal and sural nerves. Patients were compared between different visits and to healthy controls. RESULTS: Total neuropathy score increased from 2.2 at baseline to 5.8 (p < 0.001) at week 8. NCS showed a decreased sensory amplitude in the sural, radial, ulnar and median nerve after 6 months (p < 0.001). HRUS revealed a significant increase of cross-sectional area in the sural nerve (p = 0.004), the median nerve (p = 0.003) at the carpal tunnel and the ulnar nerve in the forearm (p = 0.006) after 6 months. CCM showed no changes at different visits. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal confocal microscopy and HRUS do not detect early signs of TIPN during the paclitaxel treatment period. HRUS and NCS might detect congruent signs of an axonal, predominantly sensory polyneuropathy after 6 months. The clinical examination remains the most sensitive tool in the early detection of TIPN in breast cancer patients.

Vagus nerve cross-sectional area decreases in Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Morphological alterations of the vagus nerve (VN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are discussed controversially. Several studies reported no difference in VN cross-sectional area (CSA) in PD patients in nerve ultrasound, others found a reduced CSA interpreted as atrophy of the VN and involvement of the dorsal nucleus of VN. METHODS: In a prospective comparative cross-sectional study, CSA of the VN bilaterally and the right ulnar nerve, clinical PD scales, non-motor symptoms and autonomic tests were compared between 49 PD patients and 24 healthy controls. Nerve ultrasound was performed by two independent investigators, patients and controls were compared at Bonferroni corrected p < 0.025 using results of both investigators and averaged results. Blinding included CSA measurements and PD scores, but not PD diagnosis. RESULTS: Bilateral averaged VN CSA was significantly lower in PD patients than in controls (Right VN PD mean 2.70 mm2 SD 0.69, controls 3.30 mm2 SD 0.49, p < 0.001. Left VN PD mean 2.45 mm2 SD 0.57, controls 2.77 mm2 SD 0.46, p = 0.012). No difference was found in the ulnar nerve. There was a weak negative correlation between the right VN CSA and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (-0.08 mm2 per 10 points). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the right VN was 0.78 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present results support the hypothesis of atrophy of the VN in PD. Reduction of VN CSA is a weak marker of disease progression. Nerve ultrasound of the VN might represent a supplementary method in diagnosis of PD.