Hartmann's procedure versus primary anastomosis for Hinchey stage III diverticulitis: a prospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Hartmann's procedure (HP) is the conventional treatment in patients with complicated diverticulitis. Segmental resection with primary anastomosis (PA) is a treatment alternative for those patients. Our aim was to compare the postoperative results of HP and PA in patients with complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey stage III). METHODS: A case-control study was conducted on patients operated on for purulent Hinchey stage III diverticulitis, within the time frame of 2000 and 2019. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients that underwent PA were compared with 27 that underwent HP. The patients that underwent HP had a greater probability of morbidity at 30 days (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.13-11.25), as well as a greater probability of major complications (OR 10.9; 95% CI 1.26-95.05). CONCLUSION: The patients that underwent segmental resection and PA presented with lower morbidity rates and higher stoma reversal rates than the patients that underwent HP.

Outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) is a promising minimally invasive technique but its oncologic and functional outcomes are not well studied. The primary outcome was the efficacy of RFA, and the secondary outcomes were the functional and anatomical anal changes related to RFA. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected database of patients who had RFA for HSIL at our institution, between August 2018 and March 2020. To be eligible for RFA, all patients had impairment of their immune function. Targeted ablation was applied in all cases, with 5 overlapping pulsations at the targeted HSILs (delivering 12 J/cm2 per application) followed by circumferential, 2-pulsation (12 J/cm2) overlapping anal ablation, to cover the entire anal transition zone. Patients were assessed for recurrence or metachronous disease at 3-month intervals by means of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) and targeted biopsies. Anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, the 36-Item Short Form and Massachusetts General Hospital-Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (MGH-SFQ) were assessed at baseline and 12 months after intervention. RESULTS: We included a total of 12 patients with anal HSILs. The mean age was 38.6 (± 7.68) years, and 7 (58.3%) were males. Six were HIV positive, 2 had a primary immunodeficiency disease, and 4 were receiving immunosuppressive therapy. A mean of 2.1 anal HSILs per patient were treated. At 12 months, high-resolution anoscopy showed that 7/12 (58.3%) patients had normal high-resolution anoscopy, 3/12 patients had recurrent HSILs, and 2/12 had a persistent lesion. Those lesions were treated with electrocautery, and reached complete response in the following the 6 months (total of 18 months). In particular, there were no metachronous lesions detected. Patients reported moderate to severe pain during the first 24 h after RFA, but only mild discomfort was present at 30 days. Patients were asymptomatic at their 6- and 12-month visits. RFA was not associated with changes in anorectal manometry or ultrasound examination. The 36-SF survey reported improvement in the general health domain (p = 0.038), while the MGH-SFQ showed improvements in sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, targeted plus circumferential RFA had a 58.3% efficacy rate for the treatment of anal HSIL in immunocompromised patients, achieving 100% eradication after adding electrocautery ablation. No metachronous lesions were detected. Patients presented relatively mild symptoms after the procedure, no changes in anorectal anatomy or function, and some improvements in their sexual function. These results seem promising in light of the high recurrence reported after HSIL treatment. Larger studies are needed to validate our results.

Eosinophilic cholecystitis: a retrospective study spanning a fourteen-year period. / Colecistitis eosinofílica: estudio retrospectivo de 14 años.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Eosinophilic cholecystitis is a rare entity that was first described in 1949 and is clinically indistinguishable from calculous cholecystitis. Histologically, there is transmural inflammatory infiltration of the gallbladder wall, more than 90% of which is composed of eosinophils. The aim of the present article was to review the prevalence of eosinophilic cholecystitis and analyze the clinical and surgical characteristics of patients diagnosed with the disease that were operated on at our hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients that underwent cholecystectomy and whose postoperative histopathologic diagnosis was eosinophilic cholecystitis, within the time frame of January 2000 and August 2014. The demographic, clinical, paraclinical, surgical, and histopathologic variables were described. RESULTS: Over a period of 14 years, a total of 7,494 patients underwent cholecystectomy. Of those patients, 12 had a postoperative histologic diagnosis of eosinophilic cholecystitis. Mean patient age for disease presentation was 39 years (±11 years), and female sex was predominant, with 7 cases. All the patients had concomitant gallstones and 10 patients presented with acute cholecystitis that required urgent cholecystectomy. All the cases were considered idiopathic. We found a prevalence of 0.16%, corresponding to 1 case for every 625 cholecystectomies performed at our hospital. CONCLUSION: We found a low prevalence of eosinophilic cholecystitis (0.16%) in our study population. The clinical manifestations were similar to those of calculous cholecystitis. Cholecystectomy is adequate treatment in patients with idiopathic disease.