How neuroscience relates to hearing aid amplification.

Hearing aids are used to improve sound audibility for people with hearing loss, but the ability to make use of the amplified signal, especially in the presence of competing noise, can vary across people. Here we review how neuroscientists, clinicians, and engineers are using various types of physiological information to improve the design and use of hearing aids.

Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine if consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) syllables [Hillenbrand J, Getty L, Clark M, Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:3099-3111] could be used to evoke cortical far field response patterns in humans, (2) to characterize the effects of cochlear implant-simulated channel number on the perception and physiological detection of these same CVC stimuli, and (3) to define the relationship between perception and the morphology of the physiological responses evoked by these speech stimuli. METHODS: Ten normal hearing monolingual English speaking adults were tested. Unprocessed CVC naturally spoken syllables, containing medial vowels, as well as processed versions (2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 spectral channels) were used for behavioral and physiological testing. RESULTS: (1) CVC stimuli evoked a series of overlapping P1-N1-P2 cortical responses. (2) Amplitude of P1-N1-P2 responses increased as neural conduction time (latency) decreased with increases in the number of spectral channels. Perception of the CVC stimuli improved with increasing number of spectral channels. (3) Coinciding changes in P1-N1-P2 morphology did not significantly correlate with changes in perception. CONCLUSIONS: P1-N1-P2 responses can be recorded using CVC syllables and there is an effect of channel number on the latency and amplitude of these responses, as well as on vowel identification. However, the physiological detection of the acoustic changes does not fully account for the perceptual performance of these same syllables. SIGNIFICANCE: These results provide evidence that it is possible to use vocoded CVC stimuli to learn more about the physiological detection of acoustic changes contained within speech syllables, as well as to explore brain-behavior relationships.

Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if naturally produced speech stimuli evoke distinct neural response patterns that can be reliably recorded in individuals. DESIGN: Auditory cortical evoked potentials were obtained from seven normal-hearing young adults in response to four naturally produced speech tokens (/bi/, /pi/, /[U0283]i/, and /si/). Stimuli were tokens from the standardized UCLA version of the Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) ( Dubno & Schaefer, 1992). Using a repeated measures design, subjects were tested and then retested within an 8-day period. RESULTS: Auditory cortical evoked potentials elicited by naturally produced speech sounds were reliably recorded in individuals. Also, naturally produced speech tokens, representing different acoustic cues, evoked distinct neural response patterns. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Cortical evoked potentials elicited by naturally produced speech sounds can be reliably recorded in individuals. 2) Naturally produced speech tokens, representing different acoustic cues, evoke distinct neural response patterns. 3) Given the reliability of the response, this work has potential application to the study of neural processing of speech in individuals with communication disorders as well as changes over time after various types of auditory rehabilitation.