Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Asthma ; 59(3): 494-506, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33307900

RESUMO

Urban adolescents with asthma often have inadequate preventive care. We tested the effectiveness of the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) program on asthma morbidity and preventive medication adherence.Methods:Subjects/Setting- 12-16yr olds with persistent asthma in Rochester, NY schools. Design- 3-group randomized trial (2014-2019). SB-ACT Intervention- Two core components: 1) Directly observed therapy (DOT) of preventive asthma medications, provided in school for at least 6-8 weeks for the teen to learn proper technique and experience the benefits of daily preventive therapy; 2) 4-6 weeks later, 3 sessions of motivational interviewing (MI) to discuss potential benefits from DOT and enhance motivation to take medication independently. We included 2 comparison groups: 1) DOT-only for 6-8wks, and 2) asthma education (AE) attention control. Masked follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 5, and 7mos. Outcomes- Mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs)/2 weeks and medication adherence. Analyses- Modified intention-to-treat repeated measures analysis.Results: We enrolled 430 teens (56% Black, 32% Hispanic, 85% Medicaid). There were no group differences at baseline. We found no difference in SFDs at any follow-up timepoint. More teens in the SB-ACT and DOT-only groups reported having a preventive asthma medication at each follow-up (p<.001), and almost daily adherence at 3 and 5-months (p<.001, p=.003) compared to AE. By 7 months there were no significant differences between groups in adherence (p=.49).Conclusion: SB-ACT improved preventive medication availability and short-term adherence but did not impact asthma symptoms. Further work is needed to create developmentally appropriate and effective interventions for this group.


Assuntos
Asma , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Adolescente , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Seguimentos , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Morbidade , New York/epidemiologia , População Urbana
2.
Acad Pediatr ; 15(6): 605-12, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26210908

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Premature infants are at high risk for respiratory disease, and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure further increases their risk for developing respiratory illness and asthma. Yet, SHS exposure remains problematic in this vulnerable population. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of brief asthma education plus motivational interviewing counseling on reducing SHS exposure and improving respiratory outcomes in premature infants compared to asthma education alone. METHODS: Caregivers and their infants ≤32 weeks' gestational age were enrolled after discharge from a neonatal intensive care unit in Rochester, New York, from 2007 to 2011. Participants (N = 165, 61% Medicaid insurance, 35% Black, 19% Hispanic, 59% male) were stratified by infant SHS exposure and randomly assigned to treatment or comparison groups. RESULTS: Caregivers in the treatment group reported significantly more home smoking bans (96% vs 84%, P = .03) and reduced infant contact with smokers after the intervention (40% vs 58%, P = .03), but these differences did not persist long term. At study end (8 months after neonatal intensive care unit discharge), treatment group infants showed significantly greater reduction in salivary cotinine versus comparison (-1.32 ng/mL vs -1.08 ng/mL, P = .04), but no significant differences in other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A community-based intervention incorporating motivational interviewing and asthma education may be helpful in reducing SHS exposure of premature infants in the short term. Further efforts are needed to support sustained protections for this high-risk group and ultimately, prevent acute and chronic respiratory morbidity. Strategies for successfully engaging families during this stressful period warrant attention.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Pais/educação , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Asma/prevenção & controle , Cotinina/metabolismo , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Alta do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Doenças Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Saliva/química , Fumar/terapia
3.
JAMA Pediatr ; 168(10): e141983, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25288141

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: A disproportionate number of impoverished and minority children have asthma and receive suboptimal preventive care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the Prompting Asthma Intervention in Rochester-Uniting Parents and Providers (PAIR-UP) intervention, administered in primary care offices, improves the delivery of preventive care and reduces morbidity for urban children with asthma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cluster randomized trial in which 12 urban primary care practices were matched based on size and type and randomly allocated to the PAIR-UP intervention or usual care (UC). We enrolled 638 children aged 2 to 12 years with persistent or poorly controlled asthma in the waiting room prior to a visit with a clinician for any reason from October 2009 to January 2013. Blinded interviewers called caregivers within 2 weeks to inquire about preventive measures taken at the visit and called them 2 and 6 months later to assess symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Children enrolled at PAIR-UP practices received prompts for the caregiver and clinician at the time of the visit that outlined the child's asthma severity or control as well as specific guideline-based recommendations to enhance preventive care. These practices also received educational resources and periodic feedback on their asthma care performance. The UC practices received copies of the asthma guidelines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was symptom-free days (SFDs) per 2 weeks at the 2-month follow-up. RESULTS: We enrolled 638 children (participation rate of 80%; 36% were black, 36% were Hispanic, and 68% had Medicaid insurance). Groups were similar in demographic characteristics and asthma severity at baseline. At the index visit, more children in the PAIR-UP group received a preventive medication action (new medication, increased dose, recommendation to restart preventive medication) than in the UC group (58% vs 33%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.9). More children in the PAIR-UP group than in the UC group received an asthma action plan (61% vs 23%; OR = 8.3; 95% CI, 3.7 to 18.7), discussions regarding asthma (93% vs 78%; OR = 4.5; 95% CI, 2.8 to 7.2), and secondhand smoke counseling (80% vs 63%; OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.5). At the 2-month follow-up, children in the PAIR-UP group had more SFDs per 2 weeks than those in the UC group (mean difference, 0.78 days; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.27). At 6 months, the improvement in SFDs was no longer statistically significant (mean difference, 0.56; 95% CI, -0.14 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The PAIR-UP intervention improved the delivery of preventive asthma care and reduced asthma morbidity for high-risk urban children with persistent asthma at 2 months, but the improvement in SFDs was no longer significant at 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01105754.


Assuntos
Asma/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Pais , Cuidadores , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise por Conglomerados , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , New York , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Profissional-Família , Resultado do Tratamento , Saúde da População Urbana
4.
Health Educ Res ; 28(1): 141-52, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22717938

RESUMO

Many children, including those with asthma, remain exposed to secondhand smoke. This manuscript evaluates the process of implementing a secondhand smoke reduction counseling intervention using motivational interviewing (MI) for caregivers of urban children with asthma, including reach, dose delivered, dose received and fidelity. Challenges, strategies and successes in applying MI are highlighted. Data for 140 children (3-10 years) enrolled in the School Based Asthma Therapy trial, randomized to the treatment condition and living with one or more smoker, were analyzed. Summary statistics describe the sample, process measures related to intervention implementation, and primary caregiver (PCG) satisfaction with the intervention. The full intervention was completed by 79% of PCGs, but only 17% of other smoking caregivers. Nearly all (98%) PCGs were satisfied with the care study nurses provided and felt the program might be helpful to others. Despite challenges, this intervention was feasible and well received reaching caregivers who were not actively seeking treatment for smoking cessation or secondhand smoke reduction. Anticipating the strategies required to implement such an intervention may help promote participant engagement and retention to enhance the program's ultimate success.


Assuntos
Asma , Cuidadores , Redes Comunitárias , Aconselhamento/métodos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , População Urbana , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...