Reducing disparities in behavioral health treatment in pediatric primary care: a randomized controlled trial comparing Partnering to Achieve School Success (PASS) to usual ADHD care for children ages 5 to 11 - study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Integrating behavioral health services into pediatric primary care can improve access to care, especially for children marginalized by poverty and racial/ethnic minority status. In primary care, a common presenting concern is attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Services in primary care for marginalized children with ADHD typically include medication alone; therapy to improve skills and build relationships is less available. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention offered through primary care for marginalized families coping with ADHD (Partnering to Achieve School Success, PASS) compared to treatment as usual (TAU). METHOD: Three hundred participants will be randomly assigned to PASS or TAU. Participants include children ages 5 to 11 who have ADHD and are from economically marginalized families. PASS is a personalized, enhanced behavioral intervention that includes evidence-based behavior therapy strategies and enhancements to promote family engagement, increase caregiver distress tolerance, and provide team-based care to improve academic and behavioral functioning. TAU includes services offered by primary care providers and referral for integrated behavioral health or community mental health services. Outcomes will be assessed at mid-treatment (8 weeks after baseline), post-treatment (16 weeks), and follow-up (32 weeks) using parent- and teacher-report measures of service use, child academic, behavioral, and social functioning, parenting practices, family empowerment, and team-based care. Mixed effects models will examine between-group differences at post-treatment and follow-up. Analyses will examine the mediating role of parenting practices, family empowerment, and team-based care. Subgroup analyses will examine differential effects of intervention by child clinical characteristics and socioeconomic factors. DISCUSSION: This study is unique in targeting a population of children with ADHD marginalized by low socioeconomic resources and examining an intervention designed to address the challenges of families coping with chronic stress related to poverty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04082234) on September 5, 2019, prior to enrollment of the first participant. The current version of the protocol and IRB approval date is October 4, 2023. Results will be submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov no later than 30 days prior to the due date for the submission of the draft of the final research report to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Association of Protein and Genetic Biomarkers With Response to Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections in Subjects With Axial Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this observational study was to examine the association of protein and genetic biomarkers with pain and pain-related disability in individuals with axial low back pain undergoing epidural steroid injections. DESIGN: Forty-eight adults with axial low back pain undergoing an epidural steroid injection were recruited from an academic medical center. Blood samples were assayed at baseline and follow-up for plasma proteins and functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with pain. Data regarding pain and function were collected at baseline and follow-up. The characteristics of responders (defined as 50% improvement in pain score) and nonresponders were compared, and the association between response and baseline biomarkers was examined. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of subjects were responders to injection. Responders had lower baseline plasma levels of chondroitin sulfate 846 and higher neuropeptide Y and serotonin levels than nonresponders, and baseline neuropeptide Y level correlated with change in disability levels. In addition, subjects with the variant allele for the catechol-O-methyltransferase single-nucleotide polymorphism demonstrated increased odds of responding to the injection. CONCLUSIONS: These data identify candidates who may have utility for patient selection for spinal procedures and provide support for exploration in prospective studies to assess and validate their predictive ability.

A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology.

Cancer treatment decisions are complex and may be challenging for patients, as multiple treatment options can often be reasonably considered. As a result, decisional support tools have been developed to assist patients in the decision-making process. A commonly used intervention to facilitate shared decision-making is a decision aid, which provides evidence-based outcomes information and guides patients towards choosing the treatment option that best aligns with their preferences and values. To ensure high quality, systematic frameworks and standards have been proposed for the development of an optimal aid for decision making. Studies have examined the impact of these tools on facilitating treatment decisions and improving decision-related outcomes. In radiation oncology, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that decision aids have the potential to improve patient outcomes, including increased knowledge about treatment options and decreased decisional conflict with decision-making. This article provides an overview of the shared-decision making process and summarizes the development, validation, and implementation of decision aids as patient educational tools in radiation oncology. Finally, this article reviews the findings from decision aid studies in radiation oncology and offers various strategies to effectively implement shared decision-making into clinical practice.

The contraceptive vaginal ring: female adolescents' knowledge, attitudes and plans for use.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine female adolescents' knowledge about the contraceptive vaginal ring and to assess their attitudes toward and consideration of ring use. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited 164 participants, ages 14-21, who completed a 62-item, 15-min interview assessing tampon and vaginal product use history, reproductive health history and ring awareness. Among those who had heard of the ring, knowledge was assessed with a 15-item pretest. All participants received a 2-min description of the ring with a demonstration, after which attitudes, consideration of use and posttest knowledge were assessed. RESULTS: Our study population is unique in that 92% had been sexually active and 22% who had been sexually active had also been pregnant. The mean age of coitarche was 15.2 years, and 35% had ever used emergency contraception. More than half (52%) had never heard of the ring. Of those who had heard of it, only 35% had sufficient knowledge. After a brief demonstration with a vaginal model, 98.2% acquired sufficient knowledge to use the ring correctly. More than half (57.9%) liked the idea of the ring, and 45.7% said that they would consider using it. Logistic regression demonstrated that liking the idea of the ring and considering its use were associated with comfort using at least one vaginal product, with those who were comfortable using a vaginal product being 3.1 times more likely to like the idea of the ring compared to those who were not comfortable using a vaginal product. Logistic regression also showed that liking the idea of the ring was associated with having had at least one pelvic exam. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants had limited or no prior ring knowledge. Once briefly educated, all had sufficient knowledge and a substantial percentage would consider using it. The ring appeals to adolescents and should be routinely offered as a method of contraception. Comfort using at least one vaginal product is associated with liking the idea of the ring and considering its use.