Pharyngeal mucosal closure in total laryngectomy: comparison between vertical and T-shaped closure.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes vertical and T-shaped pharyngoplasty closure techniques after total laryngectomy (TL) and to evaluate the factors associated with the development of pharyngocutaneous fistula. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study that included patients with a histopathological diagnosis of laryngeal cancer that underwent TL between 2009 and 2021. Results: Fifty-seven patients were included in the study. A total of 14 patients underwent a vertical closure of the neopharynx (24.6%), while 43 patients underwent a T-shaped closure (74.4%). Pharyngocutaneous fistula was the most common complication, observed in 40.4% of cases (n = 23). No difference in the rate of complications was observed between groups, with the exception of tracheal dehiscence which was reduced in patients with T-shaped closure (n = 2, 4.7% vs. n = 5, 35.7%, p = 0.002). Diabetes mellitus was more frequently observed in patients withthe development of pharyngocutaneous fistula (n = 7, 30.4% vs. n = 3, 8.8%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Although complicationswere lower in the T-shaped closure group, we could not establish the superiority of either technique.

Objetivo: Evaluar los desenlaces de la técnica vertical en comparación con la técnica en T para el cierre de faringoplastia posterior a una laringectomía total, y evaluar los factores asociados con el desarrollo de fístula faringocutánea. Método: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes con diagnóstico de cancer de laringe a quienes se realizó laringectomía total como tratamiento, de 2009 a 2021. Resultados: Se incluyeron 57 pacientes. A 14 (24.6%) se les realizó una faringoplastia con cierre en T y a 43 (74.4%) un cierre vertical. La fístula faringocutánea fue la complicación más frecuente, presente en el 40.4% de los casos (n = 23). No se observaron diferencias en el desarrollo de complicaciones entre grupos, con excepción de la dehiscencia traqueal, la cual fue menos frecuente en el grupo de cierre en T (n = 2, 4.7% vs. n = 5, 35.7%; p = 0.002). La diabetes mellitus se asoció con el desarrollo de fístula faringocutánea (n = 7, 30.4% vs. n = 3, 8.8%; p = 0.03). Conclusiones: Aunque se observó una tendencia a una disminución de las complicaciones en el grupo de cierre en T, no se encontró superioridad de una técnica sobre otra.

Frontal penetrating arrow injury: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating arrow injuries of the head and neck are exceedingly rare in pediatric patients. This pathology has high morbidity and mortality because of the presence of vital organs, the airway, and large vessels. Therefore, the treatment and removal of an arrow is a challenge that requires multidisciplinary management. CASE SUMMARY: A 13-year-old boy was brought to the emergency room after an arrow injury to the frontal region. The arrowhead was lodged in the oropharynx. Imaging studies showed a lesion of the paranasal sinuses without compromising vital structures. The arrow was successfully removed by retrograde nasoendoscopy without complications, and the patient was discharged. CONCLUSION: Although rare, maxillofacial arrow injuries have high morbidity and mortality and require multidisciplinary management to preserve function and aesthetics.