Impact of Medical and Neurologic Complications on the Outcome of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in a Middle-Income Country.

OBJECTIVE: Almost two thirds of the world's aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are in low- and middle-income countries. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the impact of complications on the outcome of aSAH in a middle-income country. METHODS: Baseline data (age, sex, World Federation of Neurosurgical Society, time ictus-treatment, treatment modality) and medical and neurologic complications from a cohort in Brazil (2016-2019) were evaluated: delayed cerebral ischemia; hydrocephalus; meningitis; seizures; intracranial hypertension; infections (pneumonia, bloodstream, urinary tract infection infection of undetermined source); sodium disturbances; acute kidney injury; and cardiac and pulmonary complications. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at hospital discharge. Univariate and multivariate models were employed. RESULTS: From 212 patients (71.7% female, age 52.7 ± 12.8), 92% developed at least 1 complication (any infection-43.9%, hydrocephalus-34.4%, intracranial hypertension-33%, infection of undetermined source-20.8%, hypernatremia-20.8%, hyponatremia-19.8%, delayed cerebral ischemia-related infarction-18.7%, pneumonia-18.4%, acute kidney injury-16.5%, and seizures-11.8%). In unadjusted analysis, all but hyponatremia and urinary tract infection were associated with mRS 3-6 at discharge; however, complications explained only 12% of the variation in functional outcome (mRS). Most patients were treated by clipping (66.5%), and 15.6% (33 patients) did not receive a definitive treatment. The median time ictus-admission and ictus-treatment were 5 and 9 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While medical and neurologic complications are a recognized opportunity to improve aSAH care, low- and middle-income countries comprise 70% of the world population and still encounter difficulties concerning early definitive aneurysm treatment, rebleeding, and human and material resources.

In vitro Fertilization: An Alert for the Association of Placenta Previa and Vasa Previa - Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.

A 33-year-old woman, gravida 2 para 0, with a history of two previous miscarriages, underwent an investigation for recurrent miscarriage. After genetic counseling, the couple were submitted to the karyotype, which resulted in 45, X/46, XX mosaicism (mosaic Turner syndrome) in the wife result, while the husband chromosomal resulted in 46, XY (normal). After evaluating the options, the couple opted for in vitro fertilization. During prenatal follow-up, placenta and vasa previa were identified, considerably increasing the maternal-fetal mortality rate in this case. However, despite being a delicate and challenging case, the early diagnose was possible due to transvaginal ultrasound using color Doppler. Due to good care in obstetric follow-up, involving a multidisciplinary team, a therapeutic program and a successful outcome were possible. The patient underwent a cesarean section at 35 weeks of pregnancy, without complications, with a newborn in good general condition, despite the prematurity.

Risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating.

PURPOSE: In the context of Cochrane systematic reviews/meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, risk of bias (RoB) is assessed using categorical indicators (low, unclear, or high RoB). This study sought to evaluate the indicators of the Cochrane RoB tool available for construct validity as applied to randomized clinical trials of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating. METHODS: Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the construct validity of the measurement model underlying the set of five categorical items, and the reliability of these indicators to measure RoB. RESULTS: In 48 primary randomized clinical trials, the model showed good fit indices and factor loadings higher than 0.4. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the construct validity of the Cochrane RoB tool and the reliability of three of five items in this health intervention context.

What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about cardiac arrest management?

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiac arrest is associated with high morbidity and mortality and imposes a significant burden on the healthcare system. Management of cardiac arrest patients is complex and involves approaches with multiple interventions. Here, we aimed to summarize the available evidence regarding the interventions used in cardiac arrest cases. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews (SRs), conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify all Cochrane SRs that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Titles and abstracts were screened by two authors. RESULTS: We included nine Cochrane SRs assessing compression techniques or devices (three SRs), defibrillation (two SRs) and other interventions (two SRs on hypothermia interventions, one on airway management and one on pharmacological intervention). The reviews included found qualities of evidence ranging from unknown to high, regarding the benefits of these interventions. CONCLUSION: This review included nine Cochrane systematic reviews that provided a diverse range of qualities of evidence (unknown to high) regarding interventions that are used in management of cardiac arrest. High-quality evidence was found by two systematic reviews as follows: (a) increased survival until hospital discharge with continuous compression, compared with interrupted chest compression, both administered by an untrained person and (b) no difference regarding the return of spontaneous circulation, comparing aminophylline and placebo, for bradyasystolic patients under cardiac arrest. Further studies are needed in order to reach solid conclusions.

What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about cardiac arrest management?

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiac arrest is associated with high morbidity and mortality and imposes a significant burden on the healthcare system. Management of cardiac arrest patients is complex and involves approaches with multiple interventions. Here, we aimed to summarize the available evidence regarding the interventions used in cardiac arrest cases. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews (SRs), conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify all Cochrane SRs that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Titles and abstracts were screened by two authors. RESULTS: We included nine Cochrane SRs assessing compression techniques or devices (three SRs), defibrillation (two SRs) and other interventions (two SRs on hypothermia interventions, one on airway management and one on pharmacological intervention). The reviews included found qualities of evidence ranging from unknown to high, regarding the benefits of these interventions. CONCLUSION: This review included nine Cochrane systematic reviews that provided a diverse range of qualities of evidence (unknown to high) regarding interventions that are used in management of cardiac arrest. High-quality evidence was found by two systematic reviews as follows: (a) increased survival until hospital discharge with continuous compression, compared with interrupted chest compression, both administered by an untrained person and (b) no difference regarding the return of spontaneous circulation, comparing aminophylline and placebo, for bradyasystolic patients under cardiac arrest. Further studies are needed in order to reach solid conclusions.