Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 100(5): 295-302, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30704946

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the distribution of bone lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and those with multiple myeloma (MM) using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and to assess the added value of four anatomical regions located outside the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic area to detect the presence of bone lesions in a patient-based perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (50 men; mean age, 67±10 [SD] years; range, 59-87 years) with PCa and forty-seven patients (27 women, 20 men; mean age, 62.5±9 [SD] years; range, 47-90 years) with MM were included. Three radiologists assessed bone involvement in seven anatomical areas reading all MRI sequences. RESULTS: In patients with PCa, there was a cranio-caudal increasing prevalence of metastases (22% [11/50] in the humeri and cervical spine to 60% [30/50] in the pelvis). When the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic region was not involved, the prevalence of involvement of the cervical spine, proximal humeri, ribs, or proximal femurs was 0% in patients with PCa and≥4% (except for the cervical spine, 0%) in those with MM. CONCLUSION: In patients with PCa, there is a cranio-caudal positive increment in the prevalences of metastases and covering the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic area is sufficient to determine the metastatic status of a patient with PCa. In patients with MM, there is added value of screening all regions, except the cervical spine, to detect additional lesions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Imagem Corporal Total/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Neoplasias Femorais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Femorais/secundário , Humanos , Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 99(2): 55-64, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29396088

RESUMO

This article characterizes common meniscal pathologies, reviews magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostic criteria for meniscal tears, and identifies difficult-to-detect tears and fragments and the best MRI sequences and practices for recognizing these lesions. These difficult-to-diagnose meniscal lesions that radiologists should consider include tears, meniscocapsular separation lesions, and displaced meniscal fragments. Meniscus tears are either vertical, which are generally associated with traumatic injury, horizontal, which are associated with degenerative injury, or combinations of both. MRI has a high sensitivity for tears but not for fragments; MRI performance is also better for medial than lateral meniscal lesions. Fragment detection can be improved by recognizing signs secondary to migration, especially signs of epiphyseal irritation and mechanical impingement. Radial and peripheral tears, as well as those close to the posterior horn insertion, have been traditionally difficult to detect, but improvements in arthroscopic knowledge, identification of common lesion patterns, and selection of the proper MRI sequence and plane for each lesion type mean that, when properly used, MRI is an invaluable tool in detecting all types of meniscal tears.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Lesões do Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA