Monoclonal antibody against human sperm-specific YLP12 peptide sequence involved in oocyte binding.

The monoclonalantibody (mAb) against YLP12 peptide was raised and its immunobiological properties were examined. In the Western blot procedure, the YLP12 mAb recognized a specific protein band of approximately 50 +/- 5 kD in human sperm extract and approximately 72 +/- 5 kD in human testis extract. The myeloma Ig control did not recognize these specific protein bands. In the immunofluorescence studies, the YLP12 mAb, and not the myeloma Ig, predominantly reacted with the acrosome regions of methanol-fixed human sperm. In the acrosome reaction assay, the YLP12 mAb showed a significant (p < .001) and a concentration-dependent inhibition of acrosome reaction. The myeloma Ig did not affect the acrosome reaction. There was no apparent effect of antibodies on sperm motility. Thus, the monoclonal antibody, if humanized by genetic engineering technology, may provide a useful immunocontraceptive agent.

Uterine estradiol and progesterone receptor concentration, activities of certain antioxidant enzymes and dehydrogenases and histoarchitecture in relation to time of secretion of nidatory estrogen and high endometrial sensitivity in rat.

Alterations in uterine nuclear and cytosolic estradiol (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor concentration, activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PDH) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), surface and transmission electron microscopy and histology in relation to the time of secretion of nidatory estrogen and the onset of endometrial sensitivity in the rat were investigated. A significant increase in plasma estradiol (E2) concentration in control rats was observed at 22.00 h on day 4 post-coitum, whereas progesterone (P) concentration increased at 17.00 h on day 4 and was maintained until 17.00 h on day 5. The period of high endometrial sensitivity (10.00 h on day 5) was characterized by elevated uterine cytosolic ER and nuclear and cytosolic PR concentration and POD activity, low columnar luminal epithelium with undulating surface and intercellular membranes, covered with short microvilli and pinopods, and containing numerous electron-transparent apical vesicles, mitochondria, polyribosomes, rough (RER) and smooth (SER) endoplasmic reticulum, well developed Golgi, few lysosomes and lipid droplets and loose edematous antimesometrial stroma. Inhibition in endometrial sensitivity by post-coital centchroman was associated with a marked depletion in uterine cytosolic ER and an increase in nuclear ER concentration, a decrease in POD and G-6-PDH activities, compact fibroblastic stroma, an increase in luminal epithelial cell height with decreased RER, SER, polyribosomes, Golgi, straightening of intercellular membranes, reduced surface undulations and absence of pinopods. Electron-transparent vesicles appeared flattened and clumped in the apical portion of cells, tight junctions were more prominent and lipid droplets were translucent. Nuclear and cytosolic PR and the pattern of secretion or plasma E2 and P remained unaffected. CAT, SOD and LDH activities, although high throughout pre-implantation, did not vary in relation to the secretion of nidatory estrogen, endometrial sensitivity or centchroman treatment.

Correlation of pinopod development on uterine luminal epithelial surface with hormonal events and endometrial sensitivity in rat.

Intrinsic role of preovulatory and nidatory estrogen and progesterone and presence of viable blastocysts in utero in pinopod development on the uterine luminal epithelial surface and correlation between time of their development and onset of endometrial sensitivity were investigated. In adult rats, pinopods were observed on the entire epithelium even before secretion of nidatory estrogen, i.e. at 14.00 h on day 4 post-coitum (p.c.). Apparently, their number increased, more so on the antimesometrial than the mesometrial side, at 10.00 h on day 5, but were fewer and mostly collapsed at 10.00 h on day 6. Pinopods on day 4 were located within epithelial depressions and foldings, but protruded from the surface on days 5 and 6. Normal pinopods were also present on day 8 p.c. in rats under delayed implantation, but an implantation-inducing dose of estradiol-17 beta administered about 18 h earlier caused their collapse like that on day 6 in intact rats. Development and appearance of pinopods in intact or delayed rats was unaffected when native preimplantation embryos were prevented from entering the uterus. Normal pinopods were seen in immature rats receiving progesterone for at least 3 days or cyproterone acetate for 4 days, but not after estradiol alone. In animals receiving progesterone or priming/sensitizing estradiol in addition to progesterone, the decidual response was suboptimal, irrespective of the presence of pinopods on the day of stimulation. In animals in which a condition mimicking preimplantation had been produced by suitable hormone supplementation, optimal endometrial sensitivity and decidual response were elicited, even though most pinopods appeared collapsed, resembling those on day 6 in intact rats and about 18 h after estradiol in implantation-delayed rats. Findings confirm that pinopod development on uterine luminal epithelium was dependent on progesterone alone and demonstrate that: (i) preovulatory (priming) or nidatory (endometrial sensitizing) estrogen or viable blastocysts in utero have no role in their development. Nidatory estrogen, instead, appears to limit pinopod development by causing their collapse; (ii) pinopod development/presence on the endometrial surface might indicate the uterus coming into a period of sensitivity rather than actually being in it and might thus serve as a useful marker of "transfer window" rather than "implantation window"; (iii) in the rat, pinopod development might serve as an alternate assay for evaluation of progestational activity of newer test agents.

Time-related effects of a triphenylethylene antiestrogen on estrogen-induced changes in uterine weight, estrogen receptors, and endometrial sensitivity in rats.

Time-related estrogen antagonistic action of a single oral contraceptive (1.25 mg/kg) dose of the triphenylethylene antiestrogen centchroman was determined in ovariectomized immature rats. Tamoxifen and nafoxidine were used for comparison. A single oral administration of centchroman followed by three doses of estradiol-17 beta (1 microgram/d, s.c.) caused significant dose-dependent inhibition in estradiol-17 beta-induced increase in uterine weight and nuclear and cytosolic estrogen receptors. But the inhibition at antiimplantation dose was evident only if estradiol-17 beta treatment was initiated not later than 48 h post-antiestrogen. Alternatively, when antiestrogen treatment was followed by a single dose of estradiol-17 beta between days 2-7, a synergistic action, typical of antiestrogens possessing weak estrogen agonistic activity, was observed. In immature rats in which a condition mimicking preimplantation was produced by estradiol-17 beta (0.5 microgram/d, s.c.) priming on days -2 and -1, followed by progesterone (1 mg/d, s.c.) and an endometrial sensitizing dose (0.5 microgram/d, s.c.) of estradiol-17 beta at 1600 h on day 4, anti-implantation dose of centchroman administered on day 1, too, failed to inhibit uterine weight gain induced by sensitizing dose of estradiol-17 beta, but caused marked inhibition in endometrial sensitivity to a deciduogenic stimulus and decidualization and weight gain of traumatized uterine horn 96 h post-traumatization over non-traumatized horn was only about 150% (725% in controls). Inhibition in endometrial sensitivity and decidualization was evident when the interval between antiestrogen treatment and sensitizing estradiol was < 126 h. Pinopods were present on endometrial surface on day 5 whether or not priming and/or sensitizing doses of estradiol were administered, but decidual response was mild if either of these doses of estradiol-17 beta was deferred. Findings suggest that: (a) duration of antiestrogenic action of single anti-implantation dose of centchroman in rat was about 126 h, which in ovariectomized immature rats was evident only when a condition mimicking preimplantation was produced and the antiestrogenic response was based on inhibition in estradiol-induced endometrial sensitivity and not uterine weight gain; (b) priming as well as sensitizing estrogen were essential to get optimal decidual responses; (c) appearance of pinopods on endometrial surface may not be related to endometrial sensitivity; and (d) tamoxifen and nafoxidine appear slightly longer acting with duration of antiestrogenic action of approximately 150 h.